Cargando…
Comparison of the clinical and economic outcomes between open and minimally invasive appendectomy and colectomy: evidence from a large commercial payer database
BACKGROUND: Appendectomy and colectomy are commonly performed surgical procedures. Despite evidence demonstrating advantages with the minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approach, open procedures occur with greater prevalence. Therefore, there is still controversy as to whether the MIS approach is saf...
Autores principales: | Fullum, Terrence M., Ladapo, Joseph A., Borah, Bijan J., Gunnarsson, Candace L. |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2846276/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19730950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0675-0 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The effects of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, hysterectomy, and appendectomy on nosocomial infection risks
por: Brill, Andrew, et al.
Publicado: (2008) -
Ureteral Injury After Laparoscopic Versus Open Colectomy
por: Zafar, Syed Nabeel, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Health-care expenditures are less for minimally invasive than open colectomy for colon cancer: A US commercial claims database analysis
por: Bastawrous, Amir L., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
A national database propensity score-matched comparison of minimally invasive and open colectomy for long-term opioid use
por: Bastawrous, Amir L., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Comparison of the costs of nonoperative care to minimally invasive surgery for sacroiliac joint disruption and degenerative sacroiliitis in a United States commercial payer population: potential economic implications of a new minimally invasive technology
por: Ackerman, Stacey J, et al.
Publicado: (2014)