Cargando…

Measurements of the Exerted Pressure by Pelvic Circumferential Compression Devices

BACKGROUND: Data on the efficacy and safety of non-invasive Pelvic Circumferential Compression Devices (PCCDs) is limited. Tissue damage may occur if a continuous pressure on the skin exceeding 9.3 kPa is sustained for more than two or three hours. The aim of this study was to gain insight into the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knops, Simon P, van Riel, Marcel P.J.M, Goossens, Richard H.M, van Lieshout, Esther M.M, Patka, Peter, Schipper, Inger B
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2847819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20361001
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001004020101
_version_ 1782179602737659904
author Knops, Simon P
van Riel, Marcel P.J.M
Goossens, Richard H.M
van Lieshout, Esther M.M
Patka, Peter
Schipper, Inger B
author_facet Knops, Simon P
van Riel, Marcel P.J.M
Goossens, Richard H.M
van Lieshout, Esther M.M
Patka, Peter
Schipper, Inger B
author_sort Knops, Simon P
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Data on the efficacy and safety of non-invasive Pelvic Circumferential Compression Devices (PCCDs) is limited. Tissue damage may occur if a continuous pressure on the skin exceeding 9.3 kPa is sustained for more than two or three hours. The aim of this study was to gain insight into the pressure build-up at the interface, by measuring the PCCD-induced pressure when applying pulling forces to three different PCCDs (Pelvic Binder(®) , SAM-Sling (®) and T-POD(®) ) in a simplified model. METHODS: The resulting exerted pressures were measured at four ‘anatomical’ locations (right, left, posterior and anterior) in a model using a pressure measurement system consisting of pressure cuffs. RESULTS: The exerted pressure varied substantially between the locations as well as between the PCCDs. Maximum pressures ranged from 18.9-23.3 kPa and from 19.2-27.5 kPa at the right location and left location, respectively. Pressures at the posterior location stayed below 18 kPa. At the anterior location pressures varied markedly between the different PCCDs. CONCLUSION: The circumferential compression by the different PCCDs showed high pressures measured at the four locations using a simplified model. Difference in design and functional characteristics of the PCCDs resulted in different pressure build-up at the four locations. When following the manufacturer’s instructions, the exerted pressure of all three PCCDs tested exceeded the tissue damaging level (9.3 kPa). In case of prolonged use in a clinical situation this might put patients at risk for developing tissue damage.
format Text
id pubmed-2847819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Bentham Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28478192010-04-01 Measurements of the Exerted Pressure by Pelvic Circumferential Compression Devices Knops, Simon P van Riel, Marcel P.J.M Goossens, Richard H.M van Lieshout, Esther M.M Patka, Peter Schipper, Inger B Open Orthop J Article BACKGROUND: Data on the efficacy and safety of non-invasive Pelvic Circumferential Compression Devices (PCCDs) is limited. Tissue damage may occur if a continuous pressure on the skin exceeding 9.3 kPa is sustained for more than two or three hours. The aim of this study was to gain insight into the pressure build-up at the interface, by measuring the PCCD-induced pressure when applying pulling forces to three different PCCDs (Pelvic Binder(®) , SAM-Sling (®) and T-POD(®) ) in a simplified model. METHODS: The resulting exerted pressures were measured at four ‘anatomical’ locations (right, left, posterior and anterior) in a model using a pressure measurement system consisting of pressure cuffs. RESULTS: The exerted pressure varied substantially between the locations as well as between the PCCDs. Maximum pressures ranged from 18.9-23.3 kPa and from 19.2-27.5 kPa at the right location and left location, respectively. Pressures at the posterior location stayed below 18 kPa. At the anterior location pressures varied markedly between the different PCCDs. CONCLUSION: The circumferential compression by the different PCCDs showed high pressures measured at the four locations using a simplified model. Difference in design and functional characteristics of the PCCDs resulted in different pressure build-up at the four locations. When following the manufacturer’s instructions, the exerted pressure of all three PCCDs tested exceeded the tissue damaging level (9.3 kPa). In case of prolonged use in a clinical situation this might put patients at risk for developing tissue damage. Bentham Open 2010-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC2847819/ /pubmed/20361001 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001004020101 Text en © Knops et al.; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Knops, Simon P
van Riel, Marcel P.J.M
Goossens, Richard H.M
van Lieshout, Esther M.M
Patka, Peter
Schipper, Inger B
Measurements of the Exerted Pressure by Pelvic Circumferential Compression Devices
title Measurements of the Exerted Pressure by Pelvic Circumferential Compression Devices
title_full Measurements of the Exerted Pressure by Pelvic Circumferential Compression Devices
title_fullStr Measurements of the Exerted Pressure by Pelvic Circumferential Compression Devices
title_full_unstemmed Measurements of the Exerted Pressure by Pelvic Circumferential Compression Devices
title_short Measurements of the Exerted Pressure by Pelvic Circumferential Compression Devices
title_sort measurements of the exerted pressure by pelvic circumferential compression devices
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2847819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20361001
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001004020101
work_keys_str_mv AT knopssimonp measurementsoftheexertedpressurebypelviccircumferentialcompressiondevices
AT vanrielmarcelpjm measurementsoftheexertedpressurebypelviccircumferentialcompressiondevices
AT goossensrichardhm measurementsoftheexertedpressurebypelviccircumferentialcompressiondevices
AT vanlieshoutesthermm measurementsoftheexertedpressurebypelviccircumferentialcompressiondevices
AT patkapeter measurementsoftheexertedpressurebypelviccircumferentialcompressiondevices
AT schipperingerb measurementsoftheexertedpressurebypelviccircumferentialcompressiondevices