Cargando…
Measurements of the Exerted Pressure by Pelvic Circumferential Compression Devices
BACKGROUND: Data on the efficacy and safety of non-invasive Pelvic Circumferential Compression Devices (PCCDs) is limited. Tissue damage may occur if a continuous pressure on the skin exceeding 9.3 kPa is sustained for more than two or three hours. The aim of this study was to gain insight into the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bentham Open
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2847819/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20361001 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001004020101 |
_version_ | 1782179602737659904 |
---|---|
author | Knops, Simon P van Riel, Marcel P.J.M Goossens, Richard H.M van Lieshout, Esther M.M Patka, Peter Schipper, Inger B |
author_facet | Knops, Simon P van Riel, Marcel P.J.M Goossens, Richard H.M van Lieshout, Esther M.M Patka, Peter Schipper, Inger B |
author_sort | Knops, Simon P |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Data on the efficacy and safety of non-invasive Pelvic Circumferential Compression Devices (PCCDs) is limited. Tissue damage may occur if a continuous pressure on the skin exceeding 9.3 kPa is sustained for more than two or three hours. The aim of this study was to gain insight into the pressure build-up at the interface, by measuring the PCCD-induced pressure when applying pulling forces to three different PCCDs (Pelvic Binder(®) , SAM-Sling (®) and T-POD(®) ) in a simplified model. METHODS: The resulting exerted pressures were measured at four ‘anatomical’ locations (right, left, posterior and anterior) in a model using a pressure measurement system consisting of pressure cuffs. RESULTS: The exerted pressure varied substantially between the locations as well as between the PCCDs. Maximum pressures ranged from 18.9-23.3 kPa and from 19.2-27.5 kPa at the right location and left location, respectively. Pressures at the posterior location stayed below 18 kPa. At the anterior location pressures varied markedly between the different PCCDs. CONCLUSION: The circumferential compression by the different PCCDs showed high pressures measured at the four locations using a simplified model. Difference in design and functional characteristics of the PCCDs resulted in different pressure build-up at the four locations. When following the manufacturer’s instructions, the exerted pressure of all three PCCDs tested exceeded the tissue damaging level (9.3 kPa). In case of prolonged use in a clinical situation this might put patients at risk for developing tissue damage. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2847819 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Bentham Open |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28478192010-04-01 Measurements of the Exerted Pressure by Pelvic Circumferential Compression Devices Knops, Simon P van Riel, Marcel P.J.M Goossens, Richard H.M van Lieshout, Esther M.M Patka, Peter Schipper, Inger B Open Orthop J Article BACKGROUND: Data on the efficacy and safety of non-invasive Pelvic Circumferential Compression Devices (PCCDs) is limited. Tissue damage may occur if a continuous pressure on the skin exceeding 9.3 kPa is sustained for more than two or three hours. The aim of this study was to gain insight into the pressure build-up at the interface, by measuring the PCCD-induced pressure when applying pulling forces to three different PCCDs (Pelvic Binder(®) , SAM-Sling (®) and T-POD(®) ) in a simplified model. METHODS: The resulting exerted pressures were measured at four ‘anatomical’ locations (right, left, posterior and anterior) in a model using a pressure measurement system consisting of pressure cuffs. RESULTS: The exerted pressure varied substantially between the locations as well as between the PCCDs. Maximum pressures ranged from 18.9-23.3 kPa and from 19.2-27.5 kPa at the right location and left location, respectively. Pressures at the posterior location stayed below 18 kPa. At the anterior location pressures varied markedly between the different PCCDs. CONCLUSION: The circumferential compression by the different PCCDs showed high pressures measured at the four locations using a simplified model. Difference in design and functional characteristics of the PCCDs resulted in different pressure build-up at the four locations. When following the manufacturer’s instructions, the exerted pressure of all three PCCDs tested exceeded the tissue damaging level (9.3 kPa). In case of prolonged use in a clinical situation this might put patients at risk for developing tissue damage. Bentham Open 2010-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC2847819/ /pubmed/20361001 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001004020101 Text en © Knops et al.; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Knops, Simon P van Riel, Marcel P.J.M Goossens, Richard H.M van Lieshout, Esther M.M Patka, Peter Schipper, Inger B Measurements of the Exerted Pressure by Pelvic Circumferential Compression Devices |
title | Measurements of the Exerted Pressure by Pelvic Circumferential Compression Devices |
title_full | Measurements of the Exerted Pressure by Pelvic Circumferential Compression Devices |
title_fullStr | Measurements of the Exerted Pressure by Pelvic Circumferential Compression Devices |
title_full_unstemmed | Measurements of the Exerted Pressure by Pelvic Circumferential Compression Devices |
title_short | Measurements of the Exerted Pressure by Pelvic Circumferential Compression Devices |
title_sort | measurements of the exerted pressure by pelvic circumferential compression devices |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2847819/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20361001 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001004020101 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT knopssimonp measurementsoftheexertedpressurebypelviccircumferentialcompressiondevices AT vanrielmarcelpjm measurementsoftheexertedpressurebypelviccircumferentialcompressiondevices AT goossensrichardhm measurementsoftheexertedpressurebypelviccircumferentialcompressiondevices AT vanlieshoutesthermm measurementsoftheexertedpressurebypelviccircumferentialcompressiondevices AT patkapeter measurementsoftheexertedpressurebypelviccircumferentialcompressiondevices AT schipperingerb measurementsoftheexertedpressurebypelviccircumferentialcompressiondevices |