Cargando…

Efficacy of osteopathic manipulation as an adjunctive treatment for hospitalized patients with pneumonia: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The Multicenter Osteopathic Pneumonia Study in the Elderly (MOPSE) is a registered, double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial designed to assess the efficacy of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) as an adjunctive treatment in elderly patients with pneumonia. METHODS: 406 subject...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Noll, Donald R, Degenhardt, Brian F, Morley, Thomas F, Blais, Francis X, Hortos, Kari A, Hensel, Kendi, Johnson, Jane C, Pasta, David J, Stoll, Scott T
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2848182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20302619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-4732-4-2
_version_ 1782179651074916352
author Noll, Donald R
Degenhardt, Brian F
Morley, Thomas F
Blais, Francis X
Hortos, Kari A
Hensel, Kendi
Johnson, Jane C
Pasta, David J
Stoll, Scott T
author_facet Noll, Donald R
Degenhardt, Brian F
Morley, Thomas F
Blais, Francis X
Hortos, Kari A
Hensel, Kendi
Johnson, Jane C
Pasta, David J
Stoll, Scott T
author_sort Noll, Donald R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Multicenter Osteopathic Pneumonia Study in the Elderly (MOPSE) is a registered, double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial designed to assess the efficacy of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) as an adjunctive treatment in elderly patients with pneumonia. METHODS: 406 subjects aged ≥ 50 years hospitalized with pneumonia at 7 community hospitals were randomized using concealed allocation to conventional care only (CCO), light-touch treatment (LT), or OMT groups. All subjects received conventional treatment for pneumonia. OMT and LT groups received group-specific protocols for 15 minutes, twice daily until discharge, cessation of antibiotics, respiratory failure, death, or withdrawal from the study. The primary outcomes were hospital length of stay (LOS), time to clinical stability, and a symptomatic and functional recovery score. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis (n = 387) found no significant differences between groups. Per-protocol (PP) analysis (n = 318) found a significant difference between groups (P = 0.01) in LOS. Multiple comparisons indicated a reduction in median LOS (95% confidence interval) for the OMT group (3.5 [3.2-4.0] days) versus the CCO group (4.5 [3.9-4.9] days), but not versus the LT group (3.9 [3.5-4.8] days). Secondary outcomes of duration of intravenous antibiotics and treatment endpoint were also significantly different between groups (P = 0.05 and 0.006, respectively). Duration of intravenous antibiotics and death or respiratory failure were lower for the OMT group versus the CCO group, but not versus the LT group. CONCLUSIONS: ITT analysis found no differences between groups. PP analysis found significant reductions in LOS, duration of intravenous antibiotics, and respiratory failure or death when OMT was compared to CCO. Given the prevalence of pneumonia, adjunctive OMT merits further study.
format Text
id pubmed-2848182
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28481822010-04-01 Efficacy of osteopathic manipulation as an adjunctive treatment for hospitalized patients with pneumonia: a randomized controlled trial Noll, Donald R Degenhardt, Brian F Morley, Thomas F Blais, Francis X Hortos, Kari A Hensel, Kendi Johnson, Jane C Pasta, David J Stoll, Scott T Osteopath Med Prim Care Research BACKGROUND: The Multicenter Osteopathic Pneumonia Study in the Elderly (MOPSE) is a registered, double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial designed to assess the efficacy of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) as an adjunctive treatment in elderly patients with pneumonia. METHODS: 406 subjects aged ≥ 50 years hospitalized with pneumonia at 7 community hospitals were randomized using concealed allocation to conventional care only (CCO), light-touch treatment (LT), or OMT groups. All subjects received conventional treatment for pneumonia. OMT and LT groups received group-specific protocols for 15 minutes, twice daily until discharge, cessation of antibiotics, respiratory failure, death, or withdrawal from the study. The primary outcomes were hospital length of stay (LOS), time to clinical stability, and a symptomatic and functional recovery score. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis (n = 387) found no significant differences between groups. Per-protocol (PP) analysis (n = 318) found a significant difference between groups (P = 0.01) in LOS. Multiple comparisons indicated a reduction in median LOS (95% confidence interval) for the OMT group (3.5 [3.2-4.0] days) versus the CCO group (4.5 [3.9-4.9] days), but not versus the LT group (3.9 [3.5-4.8] days). Secondary outcomes of duration of intravenous antibiotics and treatment endpoint were also significantly different between groups (P = 0.05 and 0.006, respectively). Duration of intravenous antibiotics and death or respiratory failure were lower for the OMT group versus the CCO group, but not versus the LT group. CONCLUSIONS: ITT analysis found no differences between groups. PP analysis found significant reductions in LOS, duration of intravenous antibiotics, and respiratory failure or death when OMT was compared to CCO. Given the prevalence of pneumonia, adjunctive OMT merits further study. BioMed Central 2010-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC2848182/ /pubmed/20302619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-4732-4-2 Text en Copyright ©2010 Noll et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Noll, Donald R
Degenhardt, Brian F
Morley, Thomas F
Blais, Francis X
Hortos, Kari A
Hensel, Kendi
Johnson, Jane C
Pasta, David J
Stoll, Scott T
Efficacy of osteopathic manipulation as an adjunctive treatment for hospitalized patients with pneumonia: a randomized controlled trial
title Efficacy of osteopathic manipulation as an adjunctive treatment for hospitalized patients with pneumonia: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Efficacy of osteopathic manipulation as an adjunctive treatment for hospitalized patients with pneumonia: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of osteopathic manipulation as an adjunctive treatment for hospitalized patients with pneumonia: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of osteopathic manipulation as an adjunctive treatment for hospitalized patients with pneumonia: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Efficacy of osteopathic manipulation as an adjunctive treatment for hospitalized patients with pneumonia: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort efficacy of osteopathic manipulation as an adjunctive treatment for hospitalized patients with pneumonia: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2848182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20302619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-4732-4-2
work_keys_str_mv AT nolldonaldr efficacyofosteopathicmanipulationasanadjunctivetreatmentforhospitalizedpatientswithpneumoniaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT degenhardtbrianf efficacyofosteopathicmanipulationasanadjunctivetreatmentforhospitalizedpatientswithpneumoniaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT morleythomasf efficacyofosteopathicmanipulationasanadjunctivetreatmentforhospitalizedpatientswithpneumoniaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT blaisfrancisx efficacyofosteopathicmanipulationasanadjunctivetreatmentforhospitalizedpatientswithpneumoniaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hortoskaria efficacyofosteopathicmanipulationasanadjunctivetreatmentforhospitalizedpatientswithpneumoniaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT henselkendi efficacyofosteopathicmanipulationasanadjunctivetreatmentforhospitalizedpatientswithpneumoniaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT johnsonjanec efficacyofosteopathicmanipulationasanadjunctivetreatmentforhospitalizedpatientswithpneumoniaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pastadavidj efficacyofosteopathicmanipulationasanadjunctivetreatmentforhospitalizedpatientswithpneumoniaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT stollscottt efficacyofosteopathicmanipulationasanadjunctivetreatmentforhospitalizedpatientswithpneumoniaarandomizedcontrolledtrial