Cargando…

Depletion of the non-coding regulatory 6S RNA in E. coli causes a surprising reduction in the expression of the translation machinery

BACKGROUND: 6S RNA from E. coli is known to bind to RNA polymerase interfering with transcription initiation. Because 6S RNA concentrations are maximal at stationary phase and binding occurs preferentially to the holoenzyme associated with σ(70 )(Eσ(70)) it is believed that 6S RNA supports adjustmen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neusser, Thomas, Polen, Tino, Geissen, René, Wagner, Rolf
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2848244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20222947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-165
_version_ 1782179665922752512
author Neusser, Thomas
Polen, Tino
Geissen, René
Wagner, Rolf
author_facet Neusser, Thomas
Polen, Tino
Geissen, René
Wagner, Rolf
author_sort Neusser, Thomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: 6S RNA from E. coli is known to bind to RNA polymerase interfering with transcription initiation. Because 6S RNA concentrations are maximal at stationary phase and binding occurs preferentially to the holoenzyme associated with σ(70 )(Eσ(70)) it is believed that 6S RNA supports adjustment to stationary phase transcription. Previous studies have also suggested that inhibition is specific for σ(70)-dependent promoters characterized by a weak -35 recognition motif or extended -10 promoters. There are many exceptions to this precept, showing that other types of promoters, including stationary phase-specific (σ(38)-dependent) promoters are inhibited. RESULTS: To solve this apparent ambiguity and to better understand the role of 6S RNA in stationary phase transition we have performed a genome-wide transcriptional analysis of wild-type and 6S RNA deficient cells growing to mid-log or early stationary phase. We found 245 genes at the exponential growth phase and 273 genes at the early stationary phase to be ≥ 1.5-fold differentially expressed. Up- and down-regulated genes include many transcriptional regulators, stress-related proteins, transporters and several enzymes involved in purine metabolism. As the most striking result during stationary phase, however, we obtained in the 6S RNA deficient strain a concerted expression reduction of genes constituting the translational apparatus. In accordance, primer extension analysis showed that transcription of ribosomal RNAs, representing the key molecules for ribosome biogenesis, is also significantly reduced under the same conditions. Consistent with this finding biochemical analysis of the 6S RNA deficient strain indicates that the lack of 6S RNA is apparently compensated by an increase of the basal ppGpp concentration, known to affect growth adaptation and ribosome biogenesis. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis demonstrated that the effect of 6S RNA on transcription is not strictly confined to σ(70)-dependent promoters. Moreover, the results indicate that 6S RNA is embedded in stationary phase adaptation, which is governed by the capacity of the translational machinery.
format Text
id pubmed-2848244
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28482442010-04-01 Depletion of the non-coding regulatory 6S RNA in E. coli causes a surprising reduction in the expression of the translation machinery Neusser, Thomas Polen, Tino Geissen, René Wagner, Rolf BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: 6S RNA from E. coli is known to bind to RNA polymerase interfering with transcription initiation. Because 6S RNA concentrations are maximal at stationary phase and binding occurs preferentially to the holoenzyme associated with σ(70 )(Eσ(70)) it is believed that 6S RNA supports adjustment to stationary phase transcription. Previous studies have also suggested that inhibition is specific for σ(70)-dependent promoters characterized by a weak -35 recognition motif or extended -10 promoters. There are many exceptions to this precept, showing that other types of promoters, including stationary phase-specific (σ(38)-dependent) promoters are inhibited. RESULTS: To solve this apparent ambiguity and to better understand the role of 6S RNA in stationary phase transition we have performed a genome-wide transcriptional analysis of wild-type and 6S RNA deficient cells growing to mid-log or early stationary phase. We found 245 genes at the exponential growth phase and 273 genes at the early stationary phase to be ≥ 1.5-fold differentially expressed. Up- and down-regulated genes include many transcriptional regulators, stress-related proteins, transporters and several enzymes involved in purine metabolism. As the most striking result during stationary phase, however, we obtained in the 6S RNA deficient strain a concerted expression reduction of genes constituting the translational apparatus. In accordance, primer extension analysis showed that transcription of ribosomal RNAs, representing the key molecules for ribosome biogenesis, is also significantly reduced under the same conditions. Consistent with this finding biochemical analysis of the 6S RNA deficient strain indicates that the lack of 6S RNA is apparently compensated by an increase of the basal ppGpp concentration, known to affect growth adaptation and ribosome biogenesis. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis demonstrated that the effect of 6S RNA on transcription is not strictly confined to σ(70)-dependent promoters. Moreover, the results indicate that 6S RNA is embedded in stationary phase adaptation, which is governed by the capacity of the translational machinery. BioMed Central 2010-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2848244/ /pubmed/20222947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-165 Text en Copyright ©2010 Neusser et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Neusser, Thomas
Polen, Tino
Geissen, René
Wagner, Rolf
Depletion of the non-coding regulatory 6S RNA in E. coli causes a surprising reduction in the expression of the translation machinery
title Depletion of the non-coding regulatory 6S RNA in E. coli causes a surprising reduction in the expression of the translation machinery
title_full Depletion of the non-coding regulatory 6S RNA in E. coli causes a surprising reduction in the expression of the translation machinery
title_fullStr Depletion of the non-coding regulatory 6S RNA in E. coli causes a surprising reduction in the expression of the translation machinery
title_full_unstemmed Depletion of the non-coding regulatory 6S RNA in E. coli causes a surprising reduction in the expression of the translation machinery
title_short Depletion of the non-coding regulatory 6S RNA in E. coli causes a surprising reduction in the expression of the translation machinery
title_sort depletion of the non-coding regulatory 6s rna in e. coli causes a surprising reduction in the expression of the translation machinery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2848244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20222947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-165
work_keys_str_mv AT neusserthomas depletionofthenoncodingregulatory6srnainecolicausesasurprisingreductionintheexpressionofthetranslationmachinery
AT polentino depletionofthenoncodingregulatory6srnainecolicausesasurprisingreductionintheexpressionofthetranslationmachinery
AT geissenrene depletionofthenoncodingregulatory6srnainecolicausesasurprisingreductionintheexpressionofthetranslationmachinery
AT wagnerrolf depletionofthenoncodingregulatory6srnainecolicausesasurprisingreductionintheexpressionofthetranslationmachinery