Cargando…

Updating Systematic Reviews: An International Survey

BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews (SRs) should be up to date to maintain their importance in informing healthcare policy and practice. However, little guidance is available about when and how to update SRs. Moreover, the updating policies and practices of organizations that commission or produce SRs ar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Garritty, Chantelle, Tsertsvadze, Alexander, Tricco, Andrea C., Sampson, Margaret, Moher, David
Formato:	Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Public Library of Science 2010
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2848577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20376338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009914

Ejemplares similares

Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews
por: Moher, David, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

The effects of sign language on spoken language acquisition in children with hearing loss: a systematic review protocol
por: Fitzpatrick, Elizabeth M, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

An evaluation of the completeness of safety reporting in reports of complementary and alternative medicine trials
por: Turner, Lucy-Ann, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Guidelines for randomized clinical trial protocol content: a systematic review
por: Tetzlaff, Jennifer M, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Who’s Using PDAs? Estimates of PDA Use by Health Care Providers: A Systematic Review of Surveys
por: Garritty, Chantelle, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

An Evaluation of Epidemiological and Reporting Characteristics of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) Systematic Reviews (SRs)
por: Turner, Lucy, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Developing WHO rapid advice guidelines in the setting of a public health emergency
por: Garritty, Chantelle M., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Assessing the format and content of journal published and non-journal published rapid review reports: A comparative study
por: Garritty, Chantelle, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

A surveillance system to assess the need for updating systematic reviews
por: Ahmadzai, Nadera, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
por: Tricco, Andrea C, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Safety of influenza vaccination during pregnancy: a systematic review
por: Wolfe, Dianna M, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Identifying null meta-analyses that are ripe for updating
por: Barrowman, Nicholas J, et al.
Publicado: (2003)

Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality
por: Pussegoda, Kusala, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Many quality measurements, but few quality measures assessing the quality of breast cancer care in women: A systematic review
por: Schachter, Howard M, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

How to conduct systematic reviews more expeditiously?
por: Tsertsvadze, Alexander, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Assessing how information is packaged in rapid reviews for policy-makers and other stakeholders: a cross-sectional study
por: Garritty, Chantelle, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study
por: Page, Matthew J., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Identifying approaches for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews: a descriptive study
por: Pussegoda, Kusala, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Interactions of commonly used dietary supplements with cardiovascular drugs: a systematic review
por: Kanji, Salmaan, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Assessing the quality of reports of systematic reviews in pediatric complementary and alternative medicine
por: Moher, David, et al.
Publicado: (2002)

Grading Quality of Evidence and Strength of Recommendations: A Perspective
por: Ansari, Mohammed T., et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Factors predicting completion and time to publication of Cochrane reviews
por: Tricco, Andrea C, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Elderberry for prevention and treatment of viral respiratory illnesses: a systematic review
por: Wieland, L. Susan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers
por: Rice, Danielle B., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Paper 2: Performing rapid reviews
por: King, Valerie J., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Quality improvement needed in quality improvement randomised trials: systematic review of interventions to improve care in diabetes
por: Ivers, Noah M, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Effectiveness of brief interventions as part of the screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment (SBIRT) model for reducing the non-medical use of psychoactive substances: a systematic review protocol
por: Young, Matthew M, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Effectiveness of Personal Protective Equipment for Healthcare Workers Caring for Patients with Filovirus Disease: A Rapid Review
por: Hersi, Mona, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Correction: Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers
por: Rice, Danielle B., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Rapid review programs to support health care and policy decision making: a descriptive analysis of processes and methods
por: Polisena, Julie, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Shorter courses of parenteral antibiotic therapy do not appear to influence response rates for children with acute hematogenous osteomyelitis: a systematic review
por: Le Saux, Nicole, et al.
Publicado: (2002)

The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
por: Page, Matthew J., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Following 411 Cochrane Protocols to Completion: A Retrospective Cohort Study
por: Tricco, Andrea C., et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Safety of serotonin (5-HT3) receptor antagonists in patients undergoing surgery and chemotherapy: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
por: Tricco, Andrea C, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group to play a leading role in guiding the production of informed high-quality, timely research evidence syntheses
por: Garritty, Chantelle, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Interventions to decrease the risk of adverse cardiac events for patients receiving chemotherapy and serotonin (5-HT3) receptor antagonists: a systematic review
por: Tricco, Andrea C, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
por: Page, Matthew J, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Clinical effectiveness of manual therapy for the management of musculoskeletal and non-musculoskeletal conditions: systematic review and update of UK evidence report
por: Clar, Christine, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Effectiveness of brief interventions as part of the Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) model for reducing the nonmedical use of psychoactive substances: a systematic review
por: Young, Matthew M, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Current methods for development of rapid reviews about diagnostic tests: an international survey
por: Arevalo-Rodriguez, Ingrid, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_05408vc0sr3cl7m9qgohq349vo