Cargando…
Automatic vs. manual curation of a multi-source chemical dictionary: the impact on text mining
BACKGROUND: Previously, we developed a combined dictionary dubbed Chemlist for the identification of small molecules and drugs in text based on a number of publicly available databases and tested it on an annotated corpus. To achieve an acceptable recall and precision we used a number of automatic a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2848622/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20331846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-2946-2-3 |
_version_ | 1782179696421634048 |
---|---|
author | Hettne, Kristina M Williams, Antony J van Mulligen, Erik M Kleinjans, Jos Tkachenko, Valery Kors, Jan A |
author_facet | Hettne, Kristina M Williams, Antony J van Mulligen, Erik M Kleinjans, Jos Tkachenko, Valery Kors, Jan A |
author_sort | Hettne, Kristina M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Previously, we developed a combined dictionary dubbed Chemlist for the identification of small molecules and drugs in text based on a number of publicly available databases and tested it on an annotated corpus. To achieve an acceptable recall and precision we used a number of automatic and semi-automatic processing steps together with disambiguation rules. However, it remained to be investigated which impact an extensive manual curation of a multi-source chemical dictionary would have on chemical term identification in text. ChemSpider is a chemical database that has undergone extensive manual curation aimed at establishing valid chemical name-to-structure relationships. RESULTS: We acquired the component of ChemSpider containing only manually curated names and synonyms. Rule-based term filtering, semi-automatic manual curation, and disambiguation rules were applied. We tested the dictionary from ChemSpider on an annotated corpus and compared the results with those for the Chemlist dictionary. The ChemSpider dictionary of ca. 80 k names was only a 1/3 to a 1/4 the size of Chemlist at around 300 k. The ChemSpider dictionary had a precision of 0.43 and a recall of 0.19 before the application of filtering and disambiguation and a precision of 0.87 and a recall of 0.19 after filtering and disambiguation. The Chemlist dictionary had a precision of 0.20 and a recall of 0.47 before the application of filtering and disambiguation and a precision of 0.67 and a recall of 0.40 after filtering and disambiguation. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude the following: (1) The ChemSpider dictionary achieved the best precision but the Chemlist dictionary had a higher recall and the best F-score; (2) Rule-based filtering and disambiguation is necessary to achieve a high precision for both the automatically generated and the manually curated dictionary. ChemSpider is available as a web service at http://www.chemspider.com/ and the Chemlist dictionary is freely available as an XML file in Simple Knowledge Organization System format on the web at http://www.biosemantics.org/chemlist. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2848622 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28486222010-04-02 Automatic vs. manual curation of a multi-source chemical dictionary: the impact on text mining Hettne, Kristina M Williams, Antony J van Mulligen, Erik M Kleinjans, Jos Tkachenko, Valery Kors, Jan A J Cheminform Research article BACKGROUND: Previously, we developed a combined dictionary dubbed Chemlist for the identification of small molecules and drugs in text based on a number of publicly available databases and tested it on an annotated corpus. To achieve an acceptable recall and precision we used a number of automatic and semi-automatic processing steps together with disambiguation rules. However, it remained to be investigated which impact an extensive manual curation of a multi-source chemical dictionary would have on chemical term identification in text. ChemSpider is a chemical database that has undergone extensive manual curation aimed at establishing valid chemical name-to-structure relationships. RESULTS: We acquired the component of ChemSpider containing only manually curated names and synonyms. Rule-based term filtering, semi-automatic manual curation, and disambiguation rules were applied. We tested the dictionary from ChemSpider on an annotated corpus and compared the results with those for the Chemlist dictionary. The ChemSpider dictionary of ca. 80 k names was only a 1/3 to a 1/4 the size of Chemlist at around 300 k. The ChemSpider dictionary had a precision of 0.43 and a recall of 0.19 before the application of filtering and disambiguation and a precision of 0.87 and a recall of 0.19 after filtering and disambiguation. The Chemlist dictionary had a precision of 0.20 and a recall of 0.47 before the application of filtering and disambiguation and a precision of 0.67 and a recall of 0.40 after filtering and disambiguation. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude the following: (1) The ChemSpider dictionary achieved the best precision but the Chemlist dictionary had a higher recall and the best F-score; (2) Rule-based filtering and disambiguation is necessary to achieve a high precision for both the automatically generated and the manually curated dictionary. ChemSpider is available as a web service at http://www.chemspider.com/ and the Chemlist dictionary is freely available as an XML file in Simple Knowledge Organization System format on the web at http://www.biosemantics.org/chemlist. BioMed Central 2010-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC2848622/ /pubmed/20331846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-2946-2-3 Text en Copyright ©2010 Hettne et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research article Hettne, Kristina M Williams, Antony J van Mulligen, Erik M Kleinjans, Jos Tkachenko, Valery Kors, Jan A Automatic vs. manual curation of a multi-source chemical dictionary: the impact on text mining |
title | Automatic vs. manual curation of a multi-source chemical dictionary: the impact on text mining |
title_full | Automatic vs. manual curation of a multi-source chemical dictionary: the impact on text mining |
title_fullStr | Automatic vs. manual curation of a multi-source chemical dictionary: the impact on text mining |
title_full_unstemmed | Automatic vs. manual curation of a multi-source chemical dictionary: the impact on text mining |
title_short | Automatic vs. manual curation of a multi-source chemical dictionary: the impact on text mining |
title_sort | automatic vs. manual curation of a multi-source chemical dictionary: the impact on text mining |
topic | Research article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2848622/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20331846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-2946-2-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hettnekristinam automaticvsmanualcurationofamultisourcechemicaldictionarytheimpactontextmining AT williamsantonyj automaticvsmanualcurationofamultisourcechemicaldictionarytheimpactontextmining AT vanmulligenerikm automaticvsmanualcurationofamultisourcechemicaldictionarytheimpactontextmining AT kleinjansjos automaticvsmanualcurationofamultisourcechemicaldictionarytheimpactontextmining AT tkachenkovalery automaticvsmanualcurationofamultisourcechemicaldictionarytheimpactontextmining AT korsjana automaticvsmanualcurationofamultisourcechemicaldictionarytheimpactontextmining |