Cargando…

A New Replicator: A theoretical framework for analysing replication

BACKGROUND: Replicators are the crucial entities in evolution. The notion of a replicator, however, is far less exact than the weight of its importance. Without identifying and classifying multiplying entities exactly, their dynamics cannot be determined appropriately. Therefore, it is importance to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zachar, István, Szathmáry, Eörs
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2850328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20219099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-8-21
_version_ 1782179769573441536
author Zachar, István
Szathmáry, Eörs
author_facet Zachar, István
Szathmáry, Eörs
author_sort Zachar, István
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Replicators are the crucial entities in evolution. The notion of a replicator, however, is far less exact than the weight of its importance. Without identifying and classifying multiplying entities exactly, their dynamics cannot be determined appropriately. Therefore, it is importance to decide the nature and characteristics of any multiplying entity, in a detailed and formal way. RESULTS: Replication is basically an autocatalytic process which enables us to rest on the notions of formal chemistry. This statement has major implications. Simple autocatalytic cycle intermediates are considered as non-informational replicators. A consequence of which is that any autocatalytically multiplying entity is a replicator, be it simple or overly complex (even nests). A stricter definition refers to entities which can inherit acquired changes (informational replicators). Simple autocatalytic molecules (and nests) are excluded from this group. However, in turn, any entity possessing copiable information is to be named a replicator, even multicellular organisms. In order to deal with the situation, an abstract, formal framework is presented, which allows the proper identification of various types of replicators. This sheds light on the old problem of the units and levels of selection and evolution. A hierarchical classification for the partition of the replicator-continuum is provided where specific replicators are nested within more general ones. The classification should be able to be successfully applied to known replicators and also to future candidates. CONCLUSION: This paper redefines the concept of the replicator from a bottom-up theoretical approach. The formal definition and the abstract models presented can distinguish between among all possible replicator types, based on their quantity of variable and heritable information. This allows for the exact identification of various replicator types and their underlying dynamics. The most important claim is that replication, in general, is basically autocatalysis, with a specific defined environment and selective force. A replicator is not valid unless its working environment, and the selective force to which it is subject, is specified.
format Text
id pubmed-2850328
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28503282010-04-07 A New Replicator: A theoretical framework for analysing replication Zachar, István Szathmáry, Eörs BMC Biol Correspondence BACKGROUND: Replicators are the crucial entities in evolution. The notion of a replicator, however, is far less exact than the weight of its importance. Without identifying and classifying multiplying entities exactly, their dynamics cannot be determined appropriately. Therefore, it is importance to decide the nature and characteristics of any multiplying entity, in a detailed and formal way. RESULTS: Replication is basically an autocatalytic process which enables us to rest on the notions of formal chemistry. This statement has major implications. Simple autocatalytic cycle intermediates are considered as non-informational replicators. A consequence of which is that any autocatalytically multiplying entity is a replicator, be it simple or overly complex (even nests). A stricter definition refers to entities which can inherit acquired changes (informational replicators). Simple autocatalytic molecules (and nests) are excluded from this group. However, in turn, any entity possessing copiable information is to be named a replicator, even multicellular organisms. In order to deal with the situation, an abstract, formal framework is presented, which allows the proper identification of various types of replicators. This sheds light on the old problem of the units and levels of selection and evolution. A hierarchical classification for the partition of the replicator-continuum is provided where specific replicators are nested within more general ones. The classification should be able to be successfully applied to known replicators and also to future candidates. CONCLUSION: This paper redefines the concept of the replicator from a bottom-up theoretical approach. The formal definition and the abstract models presented can distinguish between among all possible replicator types, based on their quantity of variable and heritable information. This allows for the exact identification of various replicator types and their underlying dynamics. The most important claim is that replication, in general, is basically autocatalysis, with a specific defined environment and selective force. A replicator is not valid unless its working environment, and the selective force to which it is subject, is specified. BioMed Central 2010-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2850328/ /pubmed/20219099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-8-21 Text en Copyright ©2010 Zachar and Szathmáry; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Correspondence
Zachar, István
Szathmáry, Eörs
A New Replicator: A theoretical framework for analysing replication
title A New Replicator: A theoretical framework for analysing replication
title_full A New Replicator: A theoretical framework for analysing replication
title_fullStr A New Replicator: A theoretical framework for analysing replication
title_full_unstemmed A New Replicator: A theoretical framework for analysing replication
title_short A New Replicator: A theoretical framework for analysing replication
title_sort new replicator: a theoretical framework for analysing replication
topic Correspondence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2850328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20219099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-8-21
work_keys_str_mv AT zacharistvan anewreplicatoratheoreticalframeworkforanalysingreplication
AT szathmaryeors anewreplicatoratheoreticalframeworkforanalysingreplication
AT zacharistvan newreplicatoratheoreticalframeworkforanalysingreplication
AT szathmaryeors newreplicatoratheoreticalframeworkforanalysingreplication