Cargando…
Differential engagement of brain regions within a ‘core’ network during scene construction
Reliving past events and imagining potential future events engages a well-established “core” network of brain areas. How the brain constructs, or reconstructs, these experiences or scenes has been debated extensively in the literature, but remains poorly understood. Here we designed a novel task to...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Pergamon Press
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2850391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20132831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.01.022 |
_version_ | 1782179783878115328 |
---|---|
author | Summerfield, Jennifer J. Hassabis, Demis Maguire, Eleanor A. |
author_facet | Summerfield, Jennifer J. Hassabis, Demis Maguire, Eleanor A. |
author_sort | Summerfield, Jennifer J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Reliving past events and imagining potential future events engages a well-established “core” network of brain areas. How the brain constructs, or reconstructs, these experiences or scenes has been debated extensively in the literature, but remains poorly understood. Here we designed a novel task to investigate this (re)constructive process by directly exploring how naturalistic scenes are built up from their individual elements. We “slowed-down” the construction process through the use of auditorily presented phrases describing single scene elements in a serial manner. Participants were required to integrate these elements (ranging from three to six in number) together in their imagination to form a naturalistic scene. We identified three distinct sub-networks of brain areas, each with different fMRI BOLD response profiles, favouring specific points in the scene construction process. Areas including the hippocampus and retrosplenial cortex had a biphasic profile, activating when a single scene element was imagined and when 3 elements were combined together; regions including the intra-parietal sulcus and angular gyrus steadily increased activity from 1 to 3 elements; while activity in areas such as lateral prefrontal cortex was observed from the second element onwards. Activity in these sub-networks did not increase further when integrating more than three elements. Participants confirmed that three elements were sufficient to construct a coherent and vivid scene, and once this was achieved, the addition of further elements only involved maintenance or small changes to that established scene. This task offers a potentially useful tool for breaking down scene construction, a process that may be key to a range of cognitive functions such as episodic memory, future thinking and navigation. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2850391 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Pergamon Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28503912010-04-23 Differential engagement of brain regions within a ‘core’ network during scene construction Summerfield, Jennifer J. Hassabis, Demis Maguire, Eleanor A. Neuropsychologia Article Reliving past events and imagining potential future events engages a well-established “core” network of brain areas. How the brain constructs, or reconstructs, these experiences or scenes has been debated extensively in the literature, but remains poorly understood. Here we designed a novel task to investigate this (re)constructive process by directly exploring how naturalistic scenes are built up from their individual elements. We “slowed-down” the construction process through the use of auditorily presented phrases describing single scene elements in a serial manner. Participants were required to integrate these elements (ranging from three to six in number) together in their imagination to form a naturalistic scene. We identified three distinct sub-networks of brain areas, each with different fMRI BOLD response profiles, favouring specific points in the scene construction process. Areas including the hippocampus and retrosplenial cortex had a biphasic profile, activating when a single scene element was imagined and when 3 elements were combined together; regions including the intra-parietal sulcus and angular gyrus steadily increased activity from 1 to 3 elements; while activity in areas such as lateral prefrontal cortex was observed from the second element onwards. Activity in these sub-networks did not increase further when integrating more than three elements. Participants confirmed that three elements were sufficient to construct a coherent and vivid scene, and once this was achieved, the addition of further elements only involved maintenance or small changes to that established scene. This task offers a potentially useful tool for breaking down scene construction, a process that may be key to a range of cognitive functions such as episodic memory, future thinking and navigation. Pergamon Press 2010-04 /pmc/articles/PMC2850391/ /pubmed/20132831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.01.022 Text en © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Open Access under CC BY 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) license |
spellingShingle | Article Summerfield, Jennifer J. Hassabis, Demis Maguire, Eleanor A. Differential engagement of brain regions within a ‘core’ network during scene construction |
title | Differential engagement of brain regions within a ‘core’ network during scene construction |
title_full | Differential engagement of brain regions within a ‘core’ network during scene construction |
title_fullStr | Differential engagement of brain regions within a ‘core’ network during scene construction |
title_full_unstemmed | Differential engagement of brain regions within a ‘core’ network during scene construction |
title_short | Differential engagement of brain regions within a ‘core’ network during scene construction |
title_sort | differential engagement of brain regions within a ‘core’ network during scene construction |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2850391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20132831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.01.022 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT summerfieldjenniferj differentialengagementofbrainregionswithinacorenetworkduringsceneconstruction AT hassabisdemis differentialengagementofbrainregionswithinacorenetworkduringsceneconstruction AT maguireeleanora differentialengagementofbrainregionswithinacorenetworkduringsceneconstruction |