Cargando…

Magnetic resonance (MR) colonography in the detection of colorectal lesions: a systematic review of prospective studies

OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of MR-colonography for the detection of colorectal lesions. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed for comparative MR-colonography studies, published between May 1997 and February 2009, using the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zijta, Frank M., Bipat, Shandra, Stoker, Jaap
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2850516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19936754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1663-4
_version_ 1782179787461099520
author Zijta, Frank M.
Bipat, Shandra
Stoker, Jaap
author_facet Zijta, Frank M.
Bipat, Shandra
Stoker, Jaap
author_sort Zijta, Frank M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of MR-colonography for the detection of colorectal lesions. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed for comparative MR-colonography studies, published between May 1997 and February 2009, using the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. We included studies if MR-colonography findings were prospectively compared with conventional colonoscopy in (a)symptomatic patients. Two reviewers independently extracted study design characteristics and data for summarising sensitivity and specificity. Heterogeneity in findings between studies was tested using I (2) test statistics. Sensitivity and specificity estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated on per patient basis and summary sensitivity on per polyp basis, using bivariate and univariate statistical models. RESULTS: Thirty-seven studies were found to be potentially relevant and 13 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The study population comprised 1,285 patients with a mean disease prevalence of 44% (range 22–63%). Sensitivity for the detection of CRC was 100%. Significant heterogeneity was found for overall per patient sensitivity and specificity. For polyps with a size of 10 mm or larger, per patient sensitivity and specificity estimates were 88% (95% CI 63–97%; I (2) = 37%) and 99% (95% CI 95–100%; I (2) = 60%). On a per polyp basis, polyps of 10 mm or larger were detected with a sensitivity of 84% (95% CI 66–94%; I (2) = 51%). The data were too heterogeneous for polyps smaller than 6 mm and 6–9 mm. CONCLUSION: MR-colonography can accurately detect colorectal polyps more than 10 mm in size
format Text
id pubmed-2850516
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28505162010-04-16 Magnetic resonance (MR) colonography in the detection of colorectal lesions: a systematic review of prospective studies Zijta, Frank M. Bipat, Shandra Stoker, Jaap Eur Radiol Gastrointestinal OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of MR-colonography for the detection of colorectal lesions. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed for comparative MR-colonography studies, published between May 1997 and February 2009, using the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. We included studies if MR-colonography findings were prospectively compared with conventional colonoscopy in (a)symptomatic patients. Two reviewers independently extracted study design characteristics and data for summarising sensitivity and specificity. Heterogeneity in findings between studies was tested using I (2) test statistics. Sensitivity and specificity estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated on per patient basis and summary sensitivity on per polyp basis, using bivariate and univariate statistical models. RESULTS: Thirty-seven studies were found to be potentially relevant and 13 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The study population comprised 1,285 patients with a mean disease prevalence of 44% (range 22–63%). Sensitivity for the detection of CRC was 100%. Significant heterogeneity was found for overall per patient sensitivity and specificity. For polyps with a size of 10 mm or larger, per patient sensitivity and specificity estimates were 88% (95% CI 63–97%; I (2) = 37%) and 99% (95% CI 95–100%; I (2) = 60%). On a per polyp basis, polyps of 10 mm or larger were detected with a sensitivity of 84% (95% CI 66–94%; I (2) = 51%). The data were too heterogeneous for polyps smaller than 6 mm and 6–9 mm. CONCLUSION: MR-colonography can accurately detect colorectal polyps more than 10 mm in size Springer-Verlag 2009-11-21 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2850516/ /pubmed/19936754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1663-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2009 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Gastrointestinal
Zijta, Frank M.
Bipat, Shandra
Stoker, Jaap
Magnetic resonance (MR) colonography in the detection of colorectal lesions: a systematic review of prospective studies
title Magnetic resonance (MR) colonography in the detection of colorectal lesions: a systematic review of prospective studies
title_full Magnetic resonance (MR) colonography in the detection of colorectal lesions: a systematic review of prospective studies
title_fullStr Magnetic resonance (MR) colonography in the detection of colorectal lesions: a systematic review of prospective studies
title_full_unstemmed Magnetic resonance (MR) colonography in the detection of colorectal lesions: a systematic review of prospective studies
title_short Magnetic resonance (MR) colonography in the detection of colorectal lesions: a systematic review of prospective studies
title_sort magnetic resonance (mr) colonography in the detection of colorectal lesions: a systematic review of prospective studies
topic Gastrointestinal
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2850516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19936754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1663-4
work_keys_str_mv AT zijtafrankm magneticresonancemrcolonographyinthedetectionofcolorectallesionsasystematicreviewofprospectivestudies
AT bipatshandra magneticresonancemrcolonographyinthedetectionofcolorectallesionsasystematicreviewofprospectivestudies
AT stokerjaap magneticresonancemrcolonographyinthedetectionofcolorectallesionsasystematicreviewofprospectivestudies