Cargando…

Automatic colorimetric calibration of human wounds

BACKGROUND: Recently, digital photography in medicine is considered an acceptable tool in many clinical domains, e.g. wound care. Although ever higher resolutions are available, reproducibility is still poor and visual comparison of images remains difficult. This is even more the case for measuremen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van Poucke, Sven, Haeghen, Yves Vander, Vissers, Kris, Meert, Theo, Jorens, Philippe
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2850874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20298541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2342-10-7
_version_ 1782179811123265536
author Van Poucke, Sven
Haeghen, Yves Vander
Vissers, Kris
Meert, Theo
Jorens, Philippe
author_facet Van Poucke, Sven
Haeghen, Yves Vander
Vissers, Kris
Meert, Theo
Jorens, Philippe
author_sort Van Poucke, Sven
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recently, digital photography in medicine is considered an acceptable tool in many clinical domains, e.g. wound care. Although ever higher resolutions are available, reproducibility is still poor and visual comparison of images remains difficult. This is even more the case for measurements performed on such images (colour, area, etc.). This problem is often neglected and images are freely compared and exchanged without further thought. METHODS: The first experiment checked whether camera settings or lighting conditions could negatively affect the quality of colorimetric calibration. Digital images plus a calibration chart were exposed to a variety of conditions. Precision and accuracy of colours after calibration were quantitatively assessed with a probability distribution for perceptual colour differences (dE_ab). The second experiment was designed to assess the impact of the automatic calibration procedure (i.e. chart detection) on real-world measurements. 40 Different images of real wounds were acquired and a region of interest was selected in each image. 3 Rotated versions of each image were automatically calibrated and colour differences were calculated. RESULTS: 1(st )Experiment: Colour differences between the measurements and real spectrophotometric measurements reveal median dE_ab values respectively 6.40 for the proper patches of calibrated normal images and 17.75 for uncalibrated images demonstrating an important improvement in accuracy after calibration. The reproducibility, visualized by the probability distribution of the dE_ab errors between 2 measurements of the patches of the images has a median of 3.43 dE* for all calibrated images, 23.26 dE_ab for all uncalibrated images. If we restrict ourselves to the proper patches of normal calibrated images the median is only 2.58 dE_ab! Wilcoxon sum-rank testing (p < 0.05) between uncalibrated normal images and calibrated normal images with proper squares were equal to 0 demonstrating a highly significant improvement of reproducibility. In the second experiment, the reproducibility of the chart detection during automatic calibration is presented using a probability distribution of dE_ab errors between 2 measurements of the same ROI. CONCLUSION: The investigators proposed an automatic colour calibration algorithm that ensures reproducible colour content of digital images. Evidence was provided that images taken with commercially available digital cameras can be calibrated independently of any camera settings and illumination features.
format Text
id pubmed-2850874
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28508742010-04-08 Automatic colorimetric calibration of human wounds Van Poucke, Sven Haeghen, Yves Vander Vissers, Kris Meert, Theo Jorens, Philippe BMC Med Imaging Technical Advance BACKGROUND: Recently, digital photography in medicine is considered an acceptable tool in many clinical domains, e.g. wound care. Although ever higher resolutions are available, reproducibility is still poor and visual comparison of images remains difficult. This is even more the case for measurements performed on such images (colour, area, etc.). This problem is often neglected and images are freely compared and exchanged without further thought. METHODS: The first experiment checked whether camera settings or lighting conditions could negatively affect the quality of colorimetric calibration. Digital images plus a calibration chart were exposed to a variety of conditions. Precision and accuracy of colours after calibration were quantitatively assessed with a probability distribution for perceptual colour differences (dE_ab). The second experiment was designed to assess the impact of the automatic calibration procedure (i.e. chart detection) on real-world measurements. 40 Different images of real wounds were acquired and a region of interest was selected in each image. 3 Rotated versions of each image were automatically calibrated and colour differences were calculated. RESULTS: 1(st )Experiment: Colour differences between the measurements and real spectrophotometric measurements reveal median dE_ab values respectively 6.40 for the proper patches of calibrated normal images and 17.75 for uncalibrated images demonstrating an important improvement in accuracy after calibration. The reproducibility, visualized by the probability distribution of the dE_ab errors between 2 measurements of the patches of the images has a median of 3.43 dE* for all calibrated images, 23.26 dE_ab for all uncalibrated images. If we restrict ourselves to the proper patches of normal calibrated images the median is only 2.58 dE_ab! Wilcoxon sum-rank testing (p < 0.05) between uncalibrated normal images and calibrated normal images with proper squares were equal to 0 demonstrating a highly significant improvement of reproducibility. In the second experiment, the reproducibility of the chart detection during automatic calibration is presented using a probability distribution of dE_ab errors between 2 measurements of the same ROI. CONCLUSION: The investigators proposed an automatic colour calibration algorithm that ensures reproducible colour content of digital images. Evidence was provided that images taken with commercially available digital cameras can be calibrated independently of any camera settings and illumination features. BioMed Central 2010-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2850874/ /pubmed/20298541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2342-10-7 Text en Copyright ©2010 Van Poucke et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Advance
Van Poucke, Sven
Haeghen, Yves Vander
Vissers, Kris
Meert, Theo
Jorens, Philippe
Automatic colorimetric calibration of human wounds
title Automatic colorimetric calibration of human wounds
title_full Automatic colorimetric calibration of human wounds
title_fullStr Automatic colorimetric calibration of human wounds
title_full_unstemmed Automatic colorimetric calibration of human wounds
title_short Automatic colorimetric calibration of human wounds
title_sort automatic colorimetric calibration of human wounds
topic Technical Advance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2850874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20298541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2342-10-7
work_keys_str_mv AT vanpouckesven automaticcolorimetriccalibrationofhumanwounds
AT haeghenyvesvander automaticcolorimetriccalibrationofhumanwounds
AT visserskris automaticcolorimetriccalibrationofhumanwounds
AT meerttheo automaticcolorimetriccalibrationofhumanwounds
AT jorensphilippe automaticcolorimetriccalibrationofhumanwounds