Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of Algorithms for Confirmation Test of Human African Trypanosomiasis

The control of Trypanosoma brucei gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) is compromised by low sensitivity of the routinely used parasitologic confirmation tests. More sensitive alternatives, such as mini-anion exchange centrifugation technique (mAECT) or capillary tube centrifugation (CTC),...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lutumba, Pascal, Meheus, Filip, Robays, Jo, Miaka, Constantin, Kande, Victor, Büscher, Philippe, Dujardin, Bruno, Boelaert, Marleen
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2851529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18257991
http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1310.060358
_version_ 1782179868285337600
author Lutumba, Pascal
Meheus, Filip
Robays, Jo
Miaka, Constantin
Kande, Victor
Büscher, Philippe
Dujardin, Bruno
Boelaert, Marleen
author_facet Lutumba, Pascal
Meheus, Filip
Robays, Jo
Miaka, Constantin
Kande, Victor
Büscher, Philippe
Dujardin, Bruno
Boelaert, Marleen
author_sort Lutumba, Pascal
collection PubMed
description The control of Trypanosoma brucei gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) is compromised by low sensitivity of the routinely used parasitologic confirmation tests. More sensitive alternatives, such as mini-anion exchange centrifugation technique (mAECT) or capillary tube centrifugation (CTC), are more expensive. We used formal decision analysis to assess the cost-effectiveness of alternative HAT confirmation algorithms in terms of cost per life saved. The effectiveness of the standard method, a combination of lymph node puncture (LNP), fresh blood examination (FBE), and thick blood film (TBF), was 36.8%; the LNP-FBE-CTC-mAECT sequence reached almost 80%. The cost per person examined ranged from €1.56 for LNP-FBE-TBF to €2.99 for LNP-TBF-CTC-mAECT-CATT (card agglutination test for trypanosomiasis) titration. LNP-TBF-CTC-mAECT was the most cost-effective in terms of cost per life saved. HAT confirmation algorithms that incorporate concentration techniques are more effective and efficient than the algorithms that are currently and routinely used by several T.b. gambiense control programs.
format Text
id pubmed-2851529
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28515292010-04-15 Cost-effectiveness of Algorithms for Confirmation Test of Human African Trypanosomiasis Lutumba, Pascal Meheus, Filip Robays, Jo Miaka, Constantin Kande, Victor Büscher, Philippe Dujardin, Bruno Boelaert, Marleen Emerg Infect Dis Research The control of Trypanosoma brucei gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) is compromised by low sensitivity of the routinely used parasitologic confirmation tests. More sensitive alternatives, such as mini-anion exchange centrifugation technique (mAECT) or capillary tube centrifugation (CTC), are more expensive. We used formal decision analysis to assess the cost-effectiveness of alternative HAT confirmation algorithms in terms of cost per life saved. The effectiveness of the standard method, a combination of lymph node puncture (LNP), fresh blood examination (FBE), and thick blood film (TBF), was 36.8%; the LNP-FBE-CTC-mAECT sequence reached almost 80%. The cost per person examined ranged from €1.56 for LNP-FBE-TBF to €2.99 for LNP-TBF-CTC-mAECT-CATT (card agglutination test for trypanosomiasis) titration. LNP-TBF-CTC-mAECT was the most cost-effective in terms of cost per life saved. HAT confirmation algorithms that incorporate concentration techniques are more effective and efficient than the algorithms that are currently and routinely used by several T.b. gambiense control programs. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2007-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2851529/ /pubmed/18257991 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1310.060358 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Lutumba, Pascal
Meheus, Filip
Robays, Jo
Miaka, Constantin
Kande, Victor
Büscher, Philippe
Dujardin, Bruno
Boelaert, Marleen
Cost-effectiveness of Algorithms for Confirmation Test of Human African Trypanosomiasis
title Cost-effectiveness of Algorithms for Confirmation Test of Human African Trypanosomiasis
title_full Cost-effectiveness of Algorithms for Confirmation Test of Human African Trypanosomiasis
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of Algorithms for Confirmation Test of Human African Trypanosomiasis
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of Algorithms for Confirmation Test of Human African Trypanosomiasis
title_short Cost-effectiveness of Algorithms for Confirmation Test of Human African Trypanosomiasis
title_sort cost-effectiveness of algorithms for confirmation test of human african trypanosomiasis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2851529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18257991
http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1310.060358
work_keys_str_mv AT lutumbapascal costeffectivenessofalgorithmsforconfirmationtestofhumanafricantrypanosomiasis
AT meheusfilip costeffectivenessofalgorithmsforconfirmationtestofhumanafricantrypanosomiasis
AT robaysjo costeffectivenessofalgorithmsforconfirmationtestofhumanafricantrypanosomiasis
AT miakaconstantin costeffectivenessofalgorithmsforconfirmationtestofhumanafricantrypanosomiasis
AT kandevictor costeffectivenessofalgorithmsforconfirmationtestofhumanafricantrypanosomiasis
AT buscherphilippe costeffectivenessofalgorithmsforconfirmationtestofhumanafricantrypanosomiasis
AT dujardinbruno costeffectivenessofalgorithmsforconfirmationtestofhumanafricantrypanosomiasis
AT boelaertmarleen costeffectivenessofalgorithmsforconfirmationtestofhumanafricantrypanosomiasis