Cargando…
Editorial Peer Reviewers' Recommendations at a General Medical Journal: Are They Reliable and Do Editors Care?
BACKGROUND: Editorial peer review is universally used but little studied. We examined the relationship between external reviewers' recommendations and the editorial outcome of manuscripts undergoing external peer-review at the Journal of General Internal Medicine (JGIM). METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL F...
Autores principales: | Kravitz, Richard L., Franks, Peter, Feldman, Mitchell D., Gerrity, Martha, Byrne, Cindy, Tierney, William M. |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2851650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20386704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010072 |
Ejemplares similares
-
From the Editors’ Desk: Self-Plagiarism and Other Editorial Crimes and Misdemeanors
por: Kravitz, Richard L., et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
The Validity of Peer Review in a General Medicine Journal
por: Jackson, Jeffrey L., et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Journal policies and editors’ opinions on peer review
por: Hamilton, Daniel G, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
From the Editors’ Desk: Innovation and Improvement
por: Kravitz, Richard L., et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
From the Editors’ Desk: Decisions, Decisions
por: Feldman, Mitchell D., et al.
Publicado: (2011)