Cargando…

Efficacy of a meal replacement diet plan compared to a food-based diet plan after a period of weight loss and weight maintenance: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Obesity has reached epidemic proportions in the United States. It is implicated in the development of a variety of chronic disease states and is associated with increased levels of inflammation and oxidative stress. The objective of this study is to examine the effect of Medifast's...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davis, Lisa M, Coleman, Christopher, Kiel, Jessica, Rampolla, Joni, Hutchisen, Tammy, Ford, Laura, Andersen, Wayne S, Hanlon-Mitola, Andrea
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2851659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20222968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-9-11
_version_ 1782179889406803968
author Davis, Lisa M
Coleman, Christopher
Kiel, Jessica
Rampolla, Joni
Hutchisen, Tammy
Ford, Laura
Andersen, Wayne S
Hanlon-Mitola, Andrea
author_facet Davis, Lisa M
Coleman, Christopher
Kiel, Jessica
Rampolla, Joni
Hutchisen, Tammy
Ford, Laura
Andersen, Wayne S
Hanlon-Mitola, Andrea
author_sort Davis, Lisa M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Obesity has reached epidemic proportions in the United States. It is implicated in the development of a variety of chronic disease states and is associated with increased levels of inflammation and oxidative stress. The objective of this study is to examine the effect of Medifast's meal replacement program (MD) on body weight, body composition, and biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress among obese individuals following a period of weight loss and weight maintenance compared to a an isocaloric, food-based diet (FB). METHODS: This 40-week randomized, controlled clinical trial included 90 obese adults with a body mass index (BMI) between 30 and 50 kg/m(2), randomly assigned to one of two weight loss programs for 16 weeks and then followed for a 24-week period of weight maintenance. The dietary interventions consisted of Medifast's meal replacement program for weight loss and weight maintenance, or a self-selected, isocaloric, food-based meal plan. RESULTS: Weight loss at 16 weeks was significantly better in the Medifast group (MD) versus the food-based group (FB) (12.3% vs. 6.9%), and while significantly more weight was regained during weight maintenance on MD versus FB, overall greater weight loss was achieved on MD versus FB. Significantly more of the MD participants lost ≥ 5% of their initial weight at week 16 (93% vs. 55%) and week 40 (62% vs. 30%). There was no difference in satiety observed between the two groups during the weight loss phase. Significant improvements in body composition were also observed in MD participants compared to FB at week 16 and week 40. At week 40, both groups experienced improvements in biochemical outcomes and other clinical indicators. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the meal replacement diet plan evaluated was an effective strategy for producing robust initial weight loss and for achieving improvements in a number of health-related parameters during weight maintenance, including inflammation and oxidative stress, two key factors more recently shown to underlie our most common chronic diseases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01011491
format Text
id pubmed-2851659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28516592010-04-09 Efficacy of a meal replacement diet plan compared to a food-based diet plan after a period of weight loss and weight maintenance: a randomized controlled trial Davis, Lisa M Coleman, Christopher Kiel, Jessica Rampolla, Joni Hutchisen, Tammy Ford, Laura Andersen, Wayne S Hanlon-Mitola, Andrea Nutr J Research BACKGROUND: Obesity has reached epidemic proportions in the United States. It is implicated in the development of a variety of chronic disease states and is associated with increased levels of inflammation and oxidative stress. The objective of this study is to examine the effect of Medifast's meal replacement program (MD) on body weight, body composition, and biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress among obese individuals following a period of weight loss and weight maintenance compared to a an isocaloric, food-based diet (FB). METHODS: This 40-week randomized, controlled clinical trial included 90 obese adults with a body mass index (BMI) between 30 and 50 kg/m(2), randomly assigned to one of two weight loss programs for 16 weeks and then followed for a 24-week period of weight maintenance. The dietary interventions consisted of Medifast's meal replacement program for weight loss and weight maintenance, or a self-selected, isocaloric, food-based meal plan. RESULTS: Weight loss at 16 weeks was significantly better in the Medifast group (MD) versus the food-based group (FB) (12.3% vs. 6.9%), and while significantly more weight was regained during weight maintenance on MD versus FB, overall greater weight loss was achieved on MD versus FB. Significantly more of the MD participants lost ≥ 5% of their initial weight at week 16 (93% vs. 55%) and week 40 (62% vs. 30%). There was no difference in satiety observed between the two groups during the weight loss phase. Significant improvements in body composition were also observed in MD participants compared to FB at week 16 and week 40. At week 40, both groups experienced improvements in biochemical outcomes and other clinical indicators. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the meal replacement diet plan evaluated was an effective strategy for producing robust initial weight loss and for achieving improvements in a number of health-related parameters during weight maintenance, including inflammation and oxidative stress, two key factors more recently shown to underlie our most common chronic diseases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01011491 BioMed Central 2010-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2851659/ /pubmed/20222968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-9-11 Text en Copyright ©2010 Davis et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Davis, Lisa M
Coleman, Christopher
Kiel, Jessica
Rampolla, Joni
Hutchisen, Tammy
Ford, Laura
Andersen, Wayne S
Hanlon-Mitola, Andrea
Efficacy of a meal replacement diet plan compared to a food-based diet plan after a period of weight loss and weight maintenance: a randomized controlled trial
title Efficacy of a meal replacement diet plan compared to a food-based diet plan after a period of weight loss and weight maintenance: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Efficacy of a meal replacement diet plan compared to a food-based diet plan after a period of weight loss and weight maintenance: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of a meal replacement diet plan compared to a food-based diet plan after a period of weight loss and weight maintenance: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of a meal replacement diet plan compared to a food-based diet plan after a period of weight loss and weight maintenance: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Efficacy of a meal replacement diet plan compared to a food-based diet plan after a period of weight loss and weight maintenance: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort efficacy of a meal replacement diet plan compared to a food-based diet plan after a period of weight loss and weight maintenance: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2851659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20222968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-9-11
work_keys_str_mv AT davislisam efficacyofamealreplacementdietplancomparedtoafoodbaseddietplanafteraperiodofweightlossandweightmaintenancearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT colemanchristopher efficacyofamealreplacementdietplancomparedtoafoodbaseddietplanafteraperiodofweightlossandweightmaintenancearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kieljessica efficacyofamealreplacementdietplancomparedtoafoodbaseddietplanafteraperiodofweightlossandweightmaintenancearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rampollajoni efficacyofamealreplacementdietplancomparedtoafoodbaseddietplanafteraperiodofweightlossandweightmaintenancearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hutchisentammy efficacyofamealreplacementdietplancomparedtoafoodbaseddietplanafteraperiodofweightlossandweightmaintenancearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fordlaura efficacyofamealreplacementdietplancomparedtoafoodbaseddietplanafteraperiodofweightlossandweightmaintenancearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT andersenwaynes efficacyofamealreplacementdietplancomparedtoafoodbaseddietplanafteraperiodofweightlossandweightmaintenancearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hanlonmitolaandrea efficacyofamealreplacementdietplancomparedtoafoodbaseddietplanafteraperiodofweightlossandweightmaintenancearandomizedcontrolledtrial