Cargando…
The Clinical Effect of Gait Load Test in Two Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
STUDY DESIGN: This study is a prospective, clinical study assessing the efficacy of selective decompression of the level responsible in a two-level stenosis in accordance with the neurological findings defined by the gait load test with a treadmill. PURPOSE: To clarify the clinical features of multi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Spine Surgery
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2852081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20404954 http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2009.3.2.96 |
_version_ | 1782179919123447808 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Youn-Soo Park, Sung-Jin Oh, In-Soo Kwan, Jae-Young |
author_facet | Kim, Youn-Soo Park, Sung-Jin Oh, In-Soo Kwan, Jae-Young |
author_sort | Kim, Youn-Soo |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN: This study is a prospective, clinical study assessing the efficacy of selective decompression of the level responsible in a two-level stenosis in accordance with the neurological findings defined by the gait load test with a treadmill. PURPOSE: To clarify the clinical features of multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) regarding the neurological level responsible for the symptoms, neurogenic claudication, and outcomes of selective decompression. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Most spine surgeons have reported that multilevel compression of the cauda equina induces a more severe impairment of the nerve function than a single-level compression. However, the clinical effects of multilevel LSS on the cauda equine and nerve roots are unknown. METHODS: A total of 21 patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis due to spondylosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis were selected. The level responsible for the symptoms in the two-level stenosis was determined from the neurological findings on the gait load test and functional diagnosis based on a selective nerve root block. All patients underwent a prospective, selective decompression at the level neurologically responsible only. The average follow-up period was 2.6 years (range, 1 to 6 years). The postsurgical outcome was defined using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at the post-gait load test, 2 weeks after surgery, 3 months after surgery and at the last follow up. RESULTS: Before surgery, the mean threshold distance and mean walking tolerance was 34.3 m and 113 m, respectively. All patients had neurogenic claudication and 19 of the patients had cauda equina syndrome, including hypesthesia in 11 cases, muscle weakness in 5 cases and radicular pain in 7 cases. Selective nerve blocks to determine the level responsible for the lumbosacral symptoms in 2 cases revealed a mean VAS score of 7.1, 2.61, 3.04, and 3.47 at the post-gait load test, 2 weeks after surgery, 3 months after surgery and at the last follow up, respectively. All subjects underwent surgery. After the operation, neurogenic claudication with or without cauda equna syndrome subsided in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: The gait load test allows an objective and quantitative evaluation of the gait characteristics of patients with lumbar canal stenosis and is useful for determining the appropriate level for surgical treatment. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2852081 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Korean Society of Spine Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28520812010-04-19 The Clinical Effect of Gait Load Test in Two Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Kim, Youn-Soo Park, Sung-Jin Oh, In-Soo Kwan, Jae-Young Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: This study is a prospective, clinical study assessing the efficacy of selective decompression of the level responsible in a two-level stenosis in accordance with the neurological findings defined by the gait load test with a treadmill. PURPOSE: To clarify the clinical features of multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) regarding the neurological level responsible for the symptoms, neurogenic claudication, and outcomes of selective decompression. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Most spine surgeons have reported that multilevel compression of the cauda equina induces a more severe impairment of the nerve function than a single-level compression. However, the clinical effects of multilevel LSS on the cauda equine and nerve roots are unknown. METHODS: A total of 21 patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis due to spondylosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis were selected. The level responsible for the symptoms in the two-level stenosis was determined from the neurological findings on the gait load test and functional diagnosis based on a selective nerve root block. All patients underwent a prospective, selective decompression at the level neurologically responsible only. The average follow-up period was 2.6 years (range, 1 to 6 years). The postsurgical outcome was defined using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at the post-gait load test, 2 weeks after surgery, 3 months after surgery and at the last follow up. RESULTS: Before surgery, the mean threshold distance and mean walking tolerance was 34.3 m and 113 m, respectively. All patients had neurogenic claudication and 19 of the patients had cauda equina syndrome, including hypesthesia in 11 cases, muscle weakness in 5 cases and radicular pain in 7 cases. Selective nerve blocks to determine the level responsible for the lumbosacral symptoms in 2 cases revealed a mean VAS score of 7.1, 2.61, 3.04, and 3.47 at the post-gait load test, 2 weeks after surgery, 3 months after surgery and at the last follow up, respectively. All subjects underwent surgery. After the operation, neurogenic claudication with or without cauda equna syndrome subsided in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: The gait load test allows an objective and quantitative evaluation of the gait characteristics of patients with lumbar canal stenosis and is useful for determining the appropriate level for surgical treatment. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2009-12 2009-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC2852081/ /pubmed/20404954 http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2009.3.2.96 Text en Copyright © 2009 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Kim, Youn-Soo Park, Sung-Jin Oh, In-Soo Kwan, Jae-Young The Clinical Effect of Gait Load Test in Two Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis |
title | The Clinical Effect of Gait Load Test in Two Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis |
title_full | The Clinical Effect of Gait Load Test in Two Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis |
title_fullStr | The Clinical Effect of Gait Load Test in Two Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis |
title_full_unstemmed | The Clinical Effect of Gait Load Test in Two Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis |
title_short | The Clinical Effect of Gait Load Test in Two Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis |
title_sort | clinical effect of gait load test in two level lumbar spinal stenosis |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2852081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20404954 http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2009.3.2.96 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimyounsoo theclinicaleffectofgaitloadtestintwolevellumbarspinalstenosis AT parksungjin theclinicaleffectofgaitloadtestintwolevellumbarspinalstenosis AT ohinsoo theclinicaleffectofgaitloadtestintwolevellumbarspinalstenosis AT kwanjaeyoung theclinicaleffectofgaitloadtestintwolevellumbarspinalstenosis AT kimyounsoo clinicaleffectofgaitloadtestintwolevellumbarspinalstenosis AT parksungjin clinicaleffectofgaitloadtestintwolevellumbarspinalstenosis AT ohinsoo clinicaleffectofgaitloadtestintwolevellumbarspinalstenosis AT kwanjaeyoung clinicaleffectofgaitloadtestintwolevellumbarspinalstenosis |