Cargando…

The Clinical Effect of Gait Load Test in Two Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

STUDY DESIGN: This study is a prospective, clinical study assessing the efficacy of selective decompression of the level responsible in a two-level stenosis in accordance with the neurological findings defined by the gait load test with a treadmill. PURPOSE: To clarify the clinical features of multi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Youn-Soo, Park, Sung-Jin, Oh, In-Soo, Kwan, Jae-Young
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2852081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20404954
http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2009.3.2.96
_version_ 1782179919123447808
author Kim, Youn-Soo
Park, Sung-Jin
Oh, In-Soo
Kwan, Jae-Young
author_facet Kim, Youn-Soo
Park, Sung-Jin
Oh, In-Soo
Kwan, Jae-Young
author_sort Kim, Youn-Soo
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: This study is a prospective, clinical study assessing the efficacy of selective decompression of the level responsible in a two-level stenosis in accordance with the neurological findings defined by the gait load test with a treadmill. PURPOSE: To clarify the clinical features of multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) regarding the neurological level responsible for the symptoms, neurogenic claudication, and outcomes of selective decompression. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Most spine surgeons have reported that multilevel compression of the cauda equina induces a more severe impairment of the nerve function than a single-level compression. However, the clinical effects of multilevel LSS on the cauda equine and nerve roots are unknown. METHODS: A total of 21 patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis due to spondylosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis were selected. The level responsible for the symptoms in the two-level stenosis was determined from the neurological findings on the gait load test and functional diagnosis based on a selective nerve root block. All patients underwent a prospective, selective decompression at the level neurologically responsible only. The average follow-up period was 2.6 years (range, 1 to 6 years). The postsurgical outcome was defined using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at the post-gait load test, 2 weeks after surgery, 3 months after surgery and at the last follow up. RESULTS: Before surgery, the mean threshold distance and mean walking tolerance was 34.3 m and 113 m, respectively. All patients had neurogenic claudication and 19 of the patients had cauda equina syndrome, including hypesthesia in 11 cases, muscle weakness in 5 cases and radicular pain in 7 cases. Selective nerve blocks to determine the level responsible for the lumbosacral symptoms in 2 cases revealed a mean VAS score of 7.1, 2.61, 3.04, and 3.47 at the post-gait load test, 2 weeks after surgery, 3 months after surgery and at the last follow up, respectively. All subjects underwent surgery. After the operation, neurogenic claudication with or without cauda equna syndrome subsided in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: The gait load test allows an objective and quantitative evaluation of the gait characteristics of patients with lumbar canal stenosis and is useful for determining the appropriate level for surgical treatment.
format Text
id pubmed-2852081
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Korean Society of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28520812010-04-19 The Clinical Effect of Gait Load Test in Two Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Kim, Youn-Soo Park, Sung-Jin Oh, In-Soo Kwan, Jae-Young Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: This study is a prospective, clinical study assessing the efficacy of selective decompression of the level responsible in a two-level stenosis in accordance with the neurological findings defined by the gait load test with a treadmill. PURPOSE: To clarify the clinical features of multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) regarding the neurological level responsible for the symptoms, neurogenic claudication, and outcomes of selective decompression. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Most spine surgeons have reported that multilevel compression of the cauda equina induces a more severe impairment of the nerve function than a single-level compression. However, the clinical effects of multilevel LSS on the cauda equine and nerve roots are unknown. METHODS: A total of 21 patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis due to spondylosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis were selected. The level responsible for the symptoms in the two-level stenosis was determined from the neurological findings on the gait load test and functional diagnosis based on a selective nerve root block. All patients underwent a prospective, selective decompression at the level neurologically responsible only. The average follow-up period was 2.6 years (range, 1 to 6 years). The postsurgical outcome was defined using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at the post-gait load test, 2 weeks after surgery, 3 months after surgery and at the last follow up. RESULTS: Before surgery, the mean threshold distance and mean walking tolerance was 34.3 m and 113 m, respectively. All patients had neurogenic claudication and 19 of the patients had cauda equina syndrome, including hypesthesia in 11 cases, muscle weakness in 5 cases and radicular pain in 7 cases. Selective nerve blocks to determine the level responsible for the lumbosacral symptoms in 2 cases revealed a mean VAS score of 7.1, 2.61, 3.04, and 3.47 at the post-gait load test, 2 weeks after surgery, 3 months after surgery and at the last follow up, respectively. All subjects underwent surgery. After the operation, neurogenic claudication with or without cauda equna syndrome subsided in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: The gait load test allows an objective and quantitative evaluation of the gait characteristics of patients with lumbar canal stenosis and is useful for determining the appropriate level for surgical treatment. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2009-12 2009-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC2852081/ /pubmed/20404954 http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2009.3.2.96 Text en Copyright © 2009 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Kim, Youn-Soo
Park, Sung-Jin
Oh, In-Soo
Kwan, Jae-Young
The Clinical Effect of Gait Load Test in Two Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
title The Clinical Effect of Gait Load Test in Two Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
title_full The Clinical Effect of Gait Load Test in Two Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
title_fullStr The Clinical Effect of Gait Load Test in Two Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
title_full_unstemmed The Clinical Effect of Gait Load Test in Two Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
title_short The Clinical Effect of Gait Load Test in Two Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
title_sort clinical effect of gait load test in two level lumbar spinal stenosis
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2852081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20404954
http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2009.3.2.96
work_keys_str_mv AT kimyounsoo theclinicaleffectofgaitloadtestintwolevellumbarspinalstenosis
AT parksungjin theclinicaleffectofgaitloadtestintwolevellumbarspinalstenosis
AT ohinsoo theclinicaleffectofgaitloadtestintwolevellumbarspinalstenosis
AT kwanjaeyoung theclinicaleffectofgaitloadtestintwolevellumbarspinalstenosis
AT kimyounsoo clinicaleffectofgaitloadtestintwolevellumbarspinalstenosis
AT parksungjin clinicaleffectofgaitloadtestintwolevellumbarspinalstenosis
AT ohinsoo clinicaleffectofgaitloadtestintwolevellumbarspinalstenosis
AT kwanjaeyoung clinicaleffectofgaitloadtestintwolevellumbarspinalstenosis