Cargando…
Know your dose: RADDOSE
The program RADDOSE is widely used to compute the dose absorbed by a macromolecular crystal during an X-ray diffraction experiment. A number of factors affect the absorbed dose, including the incident X-ray flux density, the photon energy and the composition of the macromolecule and of the buffer in...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Union of Crystallography
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2852302/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20382991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0907444910006724 |
_version_ | 1782179928753569792 |
---|---|
author | Paithankar, Karthik S. Garman, Elspeth F. |
author_facet | Paithankar, Karthik S. Garman, Elspeth F. |
author_sort | Paithankar, Karthik S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The program RADDOSE is widely used to compute the dose absorbed by a macromolecular crystal during an X-ray diffraction experiment. A number of factors affect the absorbed dose, including the incident X-ray flux density, the photon energy and the composition of the macromolecule and of the buffer in the crystal. An experimental dose limit for macromolecular crystallography (MX) of 30 MGy at 100 K has been reported, beyond which the biological information obtained may be compromised. Thus, for the planning of an optimized diffraction experiment the estimation of dose has become an additional tool. A number of approximations were made in the original version of RADDOSE. Recently, the code has been modified in order to take into account fluorescent X-ray escape from the crystal (version 2) and the inclusion of incoherent (Compton) scattering into the dose calculation is now reported (version 3). The Compton cross-section, although negligible at the energies currently commonly used in MX, should be considered in dose calculations for incident energies above 20 keV. Calculations using version 3 of RADDOSE reinforce previous studies that predict a reduction in the absorbed dose when data are collected at higher energies compared with data collected at 12.4 keV. Hence, a longer irradiation lifetime for the sample can be achieved at these higher energies but this is at the cost of lower diffraction intensities. The parameter ‘diffraction-dose efficiency’, which is the diffracted intensity per absorbed dose, is revisited in an attempt to investigate the benefits and pitfalls of data collection using higher and lower energy radiation, particularly for thin crystals. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2852302 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | International Union of Crystallography |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28523022010-04-13 Know your dose: RADDOSE Paithankar, Karthik S. Garman, Elspeth F. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr Research Papers The program RADDOSE is widely used to compute the dose absorbed by a macromolecular crystal during an X-ray diffraction experiment. A number of factors affect the absorbed dose, including the incident X-ray flux density, the photon energy and the composition of the macromolecule and of the buffer in the crystal. An experimental dose limit for macromolecular crystallography (MX) of 30 MGy at 100 K has been reported, beyond which the biological information obtained may be compromised. Thus, for the planning of an optimized diffraction experiment the estimation of dose has become an additional tool. A number of approximations were made in the original version of RADDOSE. Recently, the code has been modified in order to take into account fluorescent X-ray escape from the crystal (version 2) and the inclusion of incoherent (Compton) scattering into the dose calculation is now reported (version 3). The Compton cross-section, although negligible at the energies currently commonly used in MX, should be considered in dose calculations for incident energies above 20 keV. Calculations using version 3 of RADDOSE reinforce previous studies that predict a reduction in the absorbed dose when data are collected at higher energies compared with data collected at 12.4 keV. Hence, a longer irradiation lifetime for the sample can be achieved at these higher energies but this is at the cost of lower diffraction intensities. The parameter ‘diffraction-dose efficiency’, which is the diffracted intensity per absorbed dose, is revisited in an attempt to investigate the benefits and pitfalls of data collection using higher and lower energy radiation, particularly for thin crystals. International Union of Crystallography 2010-04-01 2010-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2852302/ /pubmed/20382991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0907444910006724 Text en © Paithankar & Garman 2010 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/uk/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Papers Paithankar, Karthik S. Garman, Elspeth F. Know your dose: RADDOSE |
title | Know your dose: RADDOSE
|
title_full | Know your dose: RADDOSE
|
title_fullStr | Know your dose: RADDOSE
|
title_full_unstemmed | Know your dose: RADDOSE
|
title_short | Know your dose: RADDOSE
|
title_sort | know your dose: raddose |
topic | Research Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2852302/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20382991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0907444910006724 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT paithankarkarthiks knowyourdoseraddose AT garmanelspethf knowyourdoseraddose |