Cargando…
Is sequential cranial ultrasound reliable for detection of white matter injury in very preterm infants?
INTRODUCTION: Cranial ultrasound (cUS) may not be reliable for detection of diffuse white matter (WM) injury. Our aim was to assess in very preterm infants the reliability of a classification system for WM injury on sequential cUS throughout the neonatal period, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2852528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20213135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-010-0668-7 |
_version_ | 1782179946920148992 |
---|---|
author | Leijser, Lara M. de Bruïne, Francisca T. van der Grond, Jeroen Steggerda, Sylke J. Walther, Frans J. van Wezel-Meijler, Gerda |
author_facet | Leijser, Lara M. de Bruïne, Francisca T. van der Grond, Jeroen Steggerda, Sylke J. Walther, Frans J. van Wezel-Meijler, Gerda |
author_sort | Leijser, Lara M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Cranial ultrasound (cUS) may not be reliable for detection of diffuse white matter (WM) injury. Our aim was to assess in very preterm infants the reliability of a classification system for WM injury on sequential cUS throughout the neonatal period, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as reference standard. METHODS: In 110 very preterm infants (gestational age <32 weeks), serial cUS during admission (median 8, range 4–22) and again around term equivalent age (TEA) and a single MRI around TEA were performed. cUS during admission were assessed for presence of WM changes, and contemporaneous cUS and MRI around TEA additionally for abnormality of lateral ventricles. Sequential cUS (from birth up to TEA) and MRI were classified as normal/mildly abnormal, moderately abnormal, or severely abnormal, based on a combination of findings of the WM and lateral ventricles. Predictive values of the cUS classification were calculated. RESULTS: Sequential cUS were classified as normal/mildly abnormal, moderately abnormal, and severely abnormal in, respectively, 22%, 65%, and 13% of infants and MRI in, respectively, 30%, 52%, and 18%. The positive predictive value of the cUS classification for the MRI classification was high for severely abnormal WM (0.79) but lower for normal/mildly abnormal (0.67) and moderately abnormal (0.64) WM. CONCLUSION: Sequential cUS during the neonatal period detects severely abnormal WM in very preterm infants but is less reliable for mildly and moderately abnormal WM. MRI around TEA seems needed to reliably detect WM injury in very preterm infants. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2852528 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28525282010-04-19 Is sequential cranial ultrasound reliable for detection of white matter injury in very preterm infants? Leijser, Lara M. de Bruïne, Francisca T. van der Grond, Jeroen Steggerda, Sylke J. Walther, Frans J. van Wezel-Meijler, Gerda Neuroradiology Paediatric Neuroradiology INTRODUCTION: Cranial ultrasound (cUS) may not be reliable for detection of diffuse white matter (WM) injury. Our aim was to assess in very preterm infants the reliability of a classification system for WM injury on sequential cUS throughout the neonatal period, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as reference standard. METHODS: In 110 very preterm infants (gestational age <32 weeks), serial cUS during admission (median 8, range 4–22) and again around term equivalent age (TEA) and a single MRI around TEA were performed. cUS during admission were assessed for presence of WM changes, and contemporaneous cUS and MRI around TEA additionally for abnormality of lateral ventricles. Sequential cUS (from birth up to TEA) and MRI were classified as normal/mildly abnormal, moderately abnormal, or severely abnormal, based on a combination of findings of the WM and lateral ventricles. Predictive values of the cUS classification were calculated. RESULTS: Sequential cUS were classified as normal/mildly abnormal, moderately abnormal, and severely abnormal in, respectively, 22%, 65%, and 13% of infants and MRI in, respectively, 30%, 52%, and 18%. The positive predictive value of the cUS classification for the MRI classification was high for severely abnormal WM (0.79) but lower for normal/mildly abnormal (0.67) and moderately abnormal (0.64) WM. CONCLUSION: Sequential cUS during the neonatal period detects severely abnormal WM in very preterm infants but is less reliable for mildly and moderately abnormal WM. MRI around TEA seems needed to reliably detect WM injury in very preterm infants. Springer-Verlag 2010-03-06 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2852528/ /pubmed/20213135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-010-0668-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Paediatric Neuroradiology Leijser, Lara M. de Bruïne, Francisca T. van der Grond, Jeroen Steggerda, Sylke J. Walther, Frans J. van Wezel-Meijler, Gerda Is sequential cranial ultrasound reliable for detection of white matter injury in very preterm infants? |
title | Is sequential cranial ultrasound reliable for detection of white matter injury in very preterm infants? |
title_full | Is sequential cranial ultrasound reliable for detection of white matter injury in very preterm infants? |
title_fullStr | Is sequential cranial ultrasound reliable for detection of white matter injury in very preterm infants? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is sequential cranial ultrasound reliable for detection of white matter injury in very preterm infants? |
title_short | Is sequential cranial ultrasound reliable for detection of white matter injury in very preterm infants? |
title_sort | is sequential cranial ultrasound reliable for detection of white matter injury in very preterm infants? |
topic | Paediatric Neuroradiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2852528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20213135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-010-0668-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leijserlaram issequentialcranialultrasoundreliablefordetectionofwhitematterinjuryinverypreterminfants AT debruinefranciscat issequentialcranialultrasoundreliablefordetectionofwhitematterinjuryinverypreterminfants AT vandergrondjeroen issequentialcranialultrasoundreliablefordetectionofwhitematterinjuryinverypreterminfants AT steggerdasylkej issequentialcranialultrasoundreliablefordetectionofwhitematterinjuryinverypreterminfants AT waltherfransj issequentialcranialultrasoundreliablefordetectionofwhitematterinjuryinverypreterminfants AT vanwezelmeijlergerda issequentialcranialultrasoundreliablefordetectionofwhitematterinjuryinverypreterminfants |