Cargando…

Is sequential cranial ultrasound reliable for detection of white matter injury in very preterm infants?

INTRODUCTION: Cranial ultrasound (cUS) may not be reliable for detection of diffuse white matter (WM) injury. Our aim was to assess in very preterm infants the reliability of a classification system for WM injury on sequential cUS throughout the neonatal period, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leijser, Lara M., de Bruïne, Francisca T., van der Grond, Jeroen, Steggerda, Sylke J., Walther, Frans J., van Wezel-Meijler, Gerda
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2852528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20213135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-010-0668-7
_version_ 1782179946920148992
author Leijser, Lara M.
de Bruïne, Francisca T.
van der Grond, Jeroen
Steggerda, Sylke J.
Walther, Frans J.
van Wezel-Meijler, Gerda
author_facet Leijser, Lara M.
de Bruïne, Francisca T.
van der Grond, Jeroen
Steggerda, Sylke J.
Walther, Frans J.
van Wezel-Meijler, Gerda
author_sort Leijser, Lara M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Cranial ultrasound (cUS) may not be reliable for detection of diffuse white matter (WM) injury. Our aim was to assess in very preterm infants the reliability of a classification system for WM injury on sequential cUS throughout the neonatal period, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as reference standard. METHODS: In 110 very preterm infants (gestational age <32 weeks), serial cUS during admission (median 8, range 4–22) and again around term equivalent age (TEA) and a single MRI around TEA were performed. cUS during admission were assessed for presence of WM changes, and contemporaneous cUS and MRI around TEA additionally for abnormality of lateral ventricles. Sequential cUS (from birth up to TEA) and MRI were classified as normal/mildly abnormal, moderately abnormal, or severely abnormal, based on a combination of findings of the WM and lateral ventricles. Predictive values of the cUS classification were calculated. RESULTS: Sequential cUS were classified as normal/mildly abnormal, moderately abnormal, and severely abnormal in, respectively, 22%, 65%, and 13% of infants and MRI in, respectively, 30%, 52%, and 18%. The positive predictive value of the cUS classification for the MRI classification was high for severely abnormal WM (0.79) but lower for normal/mildly abnormal (0.67) and moderately abnormal (0.64) WM. CONCLUSION: Sequential cUS during the neonatal period detects severely abnormal WM in very preterm infants but is less reliable for mildly and moderately abnormal WM. MRI around TEA seems needed to reliably detect WM injury in very preterm infants.
format Text
id pubmed-2852528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28525282010-04-19 Is sequential cranial ultrasound reliable for detection of white matter injury in very preterm infants? Leijser, Lara M. de Bruïne, Francisca T. van der Grond, Jeroen Steggerda, Sylke J. Walther, Frans J. van Wezel-Meijler, Gerda Neuroradiology Paediatric Neuroradiology INTRODUCTION: Cranial ultrasound (cUS) may not be reliable for detection of diffuse white matter (WM) injury. Our aim was to assess in very preterm infants the reliability of a classification system for WM injury on sequential cUS throughout the neonatal period, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as reference standard. METHODS: In 110 very preterm infants (gestational age <32 weeks), serial cUS during admission (median 8, range 4–22) and again around term equivalent age (TEA) and a single MRI around TEA were performed. cUS during admission were assessed for presence of WM changes, and contemporaneous cUS and MRI around TEA additionally for abnormality of lateral ventricles. Sequential cUS (from birth up to TEA) and MRI were classified as normal/mildly abnormal, moderately abnormal, or severely abnormal, based on a combination of findings of the WM and lateral ventricles. Predictive values of the cUS classification were calculated. RESULTS: Sequential cUS were classified as normal/mildly abnormal, moderately abnormal, and severely abnormal in, respectively, 22%, 65%, and 13% of infants and MRI in, respectively, 30%, 52%, and 18%. The positive predictive value of the cUS classification for the MRI classification was high for severely abnormal WM (0.79) but lower for normal/mildly abnormal (0.67) and moderately abnormal (0.64) WM. CONCLUSION: Sequential cUS during the neonatal period detects severely abnormal WM in very preterm infants but is less reliable for mildly and moderately abnormal WM. MRI around TEA seems needed to reliably detect WM injury in very preterm infants. Springer-Verlag 2010-03-06 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2852528/ /pubmed/20213135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-010-0668-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Paediatric Neuroradiology
Leijser, Lara M.
de Bruïne, Francisca T.
van der Grond, Jeroen
Steggerda, Sylke J.
Walther, Frans J.
van Wezel-Meijler, Gerda
Is sequential cranial ultrasound reliable for detection of white matter injury in very preterm infants?
title Is sequential cranial ultrasound reliable for detection of white matter injury in very preterm infants?
title_full Is sequential cranial ultrasound reliable for detection of white matter injury in very preterm infants?
title_fullStr Is sequential cranial ultrasound reliable for detection of white matter injury in very preterm infants?
title_full_unstemmed Is sequential cranial ultrasound reliable for detection of white matter injury in very preterm infants?
title_short Is sequential cranial ultrasound reliable for detection of white matter injury in very preterm infants?
title_sort is sequential cranial ultrasound reliable for detection of white matter injury in very preterm infants?
topic Paediatric Neuroradiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2852528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20213135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-010-0668-7
work_keys_str_mv AT leijserlaram issequentialcranialultrasoundreliablefordetectionofwhitematterinjuryinverypreterminfants
AT debruinefranciscat issequentialcranialultrasoundreliablefordetectionofwhitematterinjuryinverypreterminfants
AT vandergrondjeroen issequentialcranialultrasoundreliablefordetectionofwhitematterinjuryinverypreterminfants
AT steggerdasylkej issequentialcranialultrasoundreliablefordetectionofwhitematterinjuryinverypreterminfants
AT waltherfransj issequentialcranialultrasoundreliablefordetectionofwhitematterinjuryinverypreterminfants
AT vanwezelmeijlergerda issequentialcranialultrasoundreliablefordetectionofwhitematterinjuryinverypreterminfants