Cargando…

Corticospinal activation confounds cerebellar effects of posterior fossa stimuli

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of magnetic stimulation over the posterior fossa (PF) as a non-invasive assessment of cerebellar function in man. METHODS: We replicated a previously reported conditioning-test paradigm in 11 healthy subjects. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at varying...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fisher, Karen M., Lai, H. Ming, Baker, Mark R., Baker, Stuart N.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2852652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19836995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.021
_version_ 1782179955990331392
author Fisher, Karen M.
Lai, H. Ming
Baker, Mark R.
Baker, Stuart N.
author_facet Fisher, Karen M.
Lai, H. Ming
Baker, Mark R.
Baker, Stuart N.
author_sort Fisher, Karen M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of magnetic stimulation over the posterior fossa (PF) as a non-invasive assessment of cerebellar function in man. METHODS: We replicated a previously reported conditioning-test paradigm in 11 healthy subjects. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at varying intensities was applied to the PF and motor cortex with a 3, 5 or 7 ms interstimulus interval (ISI), chosen randomly for each trial. Surface electromyogram (EMG) activity was recorded from two intrinsic hand muscles and two forearm muscles. Responses were averaged and rectified, and MEP amplitudes were compared to assess whether suppression of the motor output occurred as a result of the PF conditioning pulse. RESULTS: Cortical MEPs were suppressed following conditioning-test ISIs of 5 or 7 ms. No suppression occurred with an ISI of 3 ms. PF stimuli alone also produced EMG responses, suggesting direct activation of the corticospinal tract (CST). CONCLUSIONS: CST collaterals are known to contact cortical inhibitory interneurones; antidromic CST activation could therefore contribute to the observed suppression of cortical MEPs. SIGNIFICANCE: PF stimulation probably activates multiple pathways; even at low intensities it should not be regarded as a selective assessment of cerebellar function unless stringent controls can confirm the absence of confounding activity in other pathways.
format Text
id pubmed-2852652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28526522010-04-23 Corticospinal activation confounds cerebellar effects of posterior fossa stimuli Fisher, Karen M. Lai, H. Ming Baker, Mark R. Baker, Stuart N. Clin Neurophysiol Article OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of magnetic stimulation over the posterior fossa (PF) as a non-invasive assessment of cerebellar function in man. METHODS: We replicated a previously reported conditioning-test paradigm in 11 healthy subjects. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at varying intensities was applied to the PF and motor cortex with a 3, 5 or 7 ms interstimulus interval (ISI), chosen randomly for each trial. Surface electromyogram (EMG) activity was recorded from two intrinsic hand muscles and two forearm muscles. Responses were averaged and rectified, and MEP amplitudes were compared to assess whether suppression of the motor output occurred as a result of the PF conditioning pulse. RESULTS: Cortical MEPs were suppressed following conditioning-test ISIs of 5 or 7 ms. No suppression occurred with an ISI of 3 ms. PF stimuli alone also produced EMG responses, suggesting direct activation of the corticospinal tract (CST). CONCLUSIONS: CST collaterals are known to contact cortical inhibitory interneurones; antidromic CST activation could therefore contribute to the observed suppression of cortical MEPs. SIGNIFICANCE: PF stimulation probably activates multiple pathways; even at low intensities it should not be regarded as a selective assessment of cerebellar function unless stringent controls can confirm the absence of confounding activity in other pathways. Elsevier 2009-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2852652/ /pubmed/19836995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.021 Text en © 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) license
spellingShingle Article
Fisher, Karen M.
Lai, H. Ming
Baker, Mark R.
Baker, Stuart N.
Corticospinal activation confounds cerebellar effects of posterior fossa stimuli
title Corticospinal activation confounds cerebellar effects of posterior fossa stimuli
title_full Corticospinal activation confounds cerebellar effects of posterior fossa stimuli
title_fullStr Corticospinal activation confounds cerebellar effects of posterior fossa stimuli
title_full_unstemmed Corticospinal activation confounds cerebellar effects of posterior fossa stimuli
title_short Corticospinal activation confounds cerebellar effects of posterior fossa stimuli
title_sort corticospinal activation confounds cerebellar effects of posterior fossa stimuli
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2852652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19836995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.021
work_keys_str_mv AT fisherkarenm corticospinalactivationconfoundscerebellareffectsofposteriorfossastimuli
AT laihming corticospinalactivationconfoundscerebellareffectsofposteriorfossastimuli
AT bakermarkr corticospinalactivationconfoundscerebellareffectsofposteriorfossastimuli
AT bakerstuartn corticospinalactivationconfoundscerebellareffectsofposteriorfossastimuli