Cargando…
Corticospinal activation confounds cerebellar effects of posterior fossa stimuli
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of magnetic stimulation over the posterior fossa (PF) as a non-invasive assessment of cerebellar function in man. METHODS: We replicated a previously reported conditioning-test paradigm in 11 healthy subjects. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at varying...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2852652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19836995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.021 |
_version_ | 1782179955990331392 |
---|---|
author | Fisher, Karen M. Lai, H. Ming Baker, Mark R. Baker, Stuart N. |
author_facet | Fisher, Karen M. Lai, H. Ming Baker, Mark R. Baker, Stuart N. |
author_sort | Fisher, Karen M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of magnetic stimulation over the posterior fossa (PF) as a non-invasive assessment of cerebellar function in man. METHODS: We replicated a previously reported conditioning-test paradigm in 11 healthy subjects. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at varying intensities was applied to the PF and motor cortex with a 3, 5 or 7 ms interstimulus interval (ISI), chosen randomly for each trial. Surface electromyogram (EMG) activity was recorded from two intrinsic hand muscles and two forearm muscles. Responses were averaged and rectified, and MEP amplitudes were compared to assess whether suppression of the motor output occurred as a result of the PF conditioning pulse. RESULTS: Cortical MEPs were suppressed following conditioning-test ISIs of 5 or 7 ms. No suppression occurred with an ISI of 3 ms. PF stimuli alone also produced EMG responses, suggesting direct activation of the corticospinal tract (CST). CONCLUSIONS: CST collaterals are known to contact cortical inhibitory interneurones; antidromic CST activation could therefore contribute to the observed suppression of cortical MEPs. SIGNIFICANCE: PF stimulation probably activates multiple pathways; even at low intensities it should not be regarded as a selective assessment of cerebellar function unless stringent controls can confirm the absence of confounding activity in other pathways. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2852652 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28526522010-04-23 Corticospinal activation confounds cerebellar effects of posterior fossa stimuli Fisher, Karen M. Lai, H. Ming Baker, Mark R. Baker, Stuart N. Clin Neurophysiol Article OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of magnetic stimulation over the posterior fossa (PF) as a non-invasive assessment of cerebellar function in man. METHODS: We replicated a previously reported conditioning-test paradigm in 11 healthy subjects. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at varying intensities was applied to the PF and motor cortex with a 3, 5 or 7 ms interstimulus interval (ISI), chosen randomly for each trial. Surface electromyogram (EMG) activity was recorded from two intrinsic hand muscles and two forearm muscles. Responses were averaged and rectified, and MEP amplitudes were compared to assess whether suppression of the motor output occurred as a result of the PF conditioning pulse. RESULTS: Cortical MEPs were suppressed following conditioning-test ISIs of 5 or 7 ms. No suppression occurred with an ISI of 3 ms. PF stimuli alone also produced EMG responses, suggesting direct activation of the corticospinal tract (CST). CONCLUSIONS: CST collaterals are known to contact cortical inhibitory interneurones; antidromic CST activation could therefore contribute to the observed suppression of cortical MEPs. SIGNIFICANCE: PF stimulation probably activates multiple pathways; even at low intensities it should not be regarded as a selective assessment of cerebellar function unless stringent controls can confirm the absence of confounding activity in other pathways. Elsevier 2009-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2852652/ /pubmed/19836995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.021 Text en © 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) license |
spellingShingle | Article Fisher, Karen M. Lai, H. Ming Baker, Mark R. Baker, Stuart N. Corticospinal activation confounds cerebellar effects of posterior fossa stimuli |
title | Corticospinal activation confounds cerebellar effects of posterior fossa stimuli |
title_full | Corticospinal activation confounds cerebellar effects of posterior fossa stimuli |
title_fullStr | Corticospinal activation confounds cerebellar effects of posterior fossa stimuli |
title_full_unstemmed | Corticospinal activation confounds cerebellar effects of posterior fossa stimuli |
title_short | Corticospinal activation confounds cerebellar effects of posterior fossa stimuli |
title_sort | corticospinal activation confounds cerebellar effects of posterior fossa stimuli |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2852652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19836995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.021 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fisherkarenm corticospinalactivationconfoundscerebellareffectsofposteriorfossastimuli AT laihming corticospinalactivationconfoundscerebellareffectsofposteriorfossastimuli AT bakermarkr corticospinalactivationconfoundscerebellareffectsofposteriorfossastimuli AT bakerstuartn corticospinalactivationconfoundscerebellareffectsofposteriorfossastimuli |