Cargando…
Impact of Posterior Urethral Plate Repair on Continence Following Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the continence rate following reconstruction of the posterior urethral plate in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RLRP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 50 men with clinically localized prostate cancer who underw...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Yonsei University College of Medicine
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2852800/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20376897 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2010.51.3.427 |
_version_ | 1782179988738408448 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Isaac Yi Hwang, Eun A Mmeje, Chinedu Ercolani, Matthew Lee, Dong Hyeon |
author_facet | Kim, Isaac Yi Hwang, Eun A Mmeje, Chinedu Ercolani, Matthew Lee, Dong Hyeon |
author_sort | Kim, Isaac Yi |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the continence rate following reconstruction of the posterior urethral plate in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RLRP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 50 men with clinically localized prostate cancer who underwent RLRP was carried out. Twenty-five patients underwent RLRP using the reconstruction of the posterior aspect of the rhabdosphincter (Rocco repair). Results of 25 consecutive patients who underwent RLRP prior to the implementation of the Rocco repair were used as the control. Continence was assessed at 7, 30, 90, and 180 days following foley catheter removal using the EPIC questionnaire as well as a follow-up interview with the surgeon. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in any of the patient demographics. At 7 days, the Rocco experimental group had a continence rate of 19% vs. 38.1% in the non-Rocco control group (p = 0.306). At 30 days, the continence rate in the Rocco group was 76.2% vs. 71.4% in the non-Rocco group (p = 1). At 90 days, the values were 88% vs. 80% (p = 0.718), respectively. At 180 days, the pad-free rate was 96% in both groups. CONCLUSION: Rocco repair offers no significant advantage in the time to recovery of continence following RLRP when continence is defined as the use of zero pads per day. On the other hand, Rocco repair was associated with increased incidence of urinary retention requiring prolonged foley catheter placement. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2852800 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Yonsei University College of Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28528002010-05-01 Impact of Posterior Urethral Plate Repair on Continence Following Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Kim, Isaac Yi Hwang, Eun A Mmeje, Chinedu Ercolani, Matthew Lee, Dong Hyeon Yonsei Med J Original Article PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the continence rate following reconstruction of the posterior urethral plate in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RLRP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 50 men with clinically localized prostate cancer who underwent RLRP was carried out. Twenty-five patients underwent RLRP using the reconstruction of the posterior aspect of the rhabdosphincter (Rocco repair). Results of 25 consecutive patients who underwent RLRP prior to the implementation of the Rocco repair were used as the control. Continence was assessed at 7, 30, 90, and 180 days following foley catheter removal using the EPIC questionnaire as well as a follow-up interview with the surgeon. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in any of the patient demographics. At 7 days, the Rocco experimental group had a continence rate of 19% vs. 38.1% in the non-Rocco control group (p = 0.306). At 30 days, the continence rate in the Rocco group was 76.2% vs. 71.4% in the non-Rocco group (p = 1). At 90 days, the values were 88% vs. 80% (p = 0.718), respectively. At 180 days, the pad-free rate was 96% in both groups. CONCLUSION: Rocco repair offers no significant advantage in the time to recovery of continence following RLRP when continence is defined as the use of zero pads per day. On the other hand, Rocco repair was associated with increased incidence of urinary retention requiring prolonged foley catheter placement. Yonsei University College of Medicine 2010-05-01 2010-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC2852800/ /pubmed/20376897 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2010.51.3.427 Text en © Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2010 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kim, Isaac Yi Hwang, Eun A Mmeje, Chinedu Ercolani, Matthew Lee, Dong Hyeon Impact of Posterior Urethral Plate Repair on Continence Following Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy |
title | Impact of Posterior Urethral Plate Repair on Continence Following Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy |
title_full | Impact of Posterior Urethral Plate Repair on Continence Following Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy |
title_fullStr | Impact of Posterior Urethral Plate Repair on Continence Following Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Posterior Urethral Plate Repair on Continence Following Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy |
title_short | Impact of Posterior Urethral Plate Repair on Continence Following Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy |
title_sort | impact of posterior urethral plate repair on continence following robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2852800/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20376897 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2010.51.3.427 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimisaacyi impactofposteriorurethralplaterepaironcontinencefollowingrobotassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy AT hwangeuna impactofposteriorurethralplaterepaironcontinencefollowingrobotassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy AT mmejechinedu impactofposteriorurethralplaterepaironcontinencefollowingrobotassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy AT ercolanimatthew impactofposteriorurethralplaterepaironcontinencefollowingrobotassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy AT leedonghyeon impactofposteriorurethralplaterepaironcontinencefollowingrobotassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy |