Cargando…

Detection and identification of mycobacteria in sputum from suspected tuberculosis patients

BACKGROUND: Detection of Tuberculosis agent like nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) species by culture and microscopic methods remains difficult and time consuming. A fast and reliable diagnosis of tuberculosis would greatly improve the control of the disease. The purpose of this study is to compare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hatta, Mochammad, Sultan, Andi Rofian, Tandirogang, Nataniel
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2853547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20233391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-3-72
_version_ 1782180042668769280
author Hatta, Mochammad
Sultan, Andi Rofian
Tandirogang, Nataniel
author_facet Hatta, Mochammad
Sultan, Andi Rofian
Tandirogang, Nataniel
author_sort Hatta, Mochammad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Detection of Tuberculosis agent like nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) species by culture and microscopic methods remains difficult and time consuming. A fast and reliable diagnosis of tuberculosis would greatly improve the control of the disease. The purpose of this study is to compare the conventional multiplex PCR and multiplex PCR reverse cross blot hybridization assay to culture method in terms of mycobacteria species detection. FINDINGS: Among the 117 positively cultured samples, nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) species were found in 9 samples of multiplex PCR reverse cross blot hybridization assay; compared to only 3 NTM species found in our conventional multiplex PCR, and 13 NTM species were successfully identified among 162 negatively cultured samples compared to only 5 NTM species identification in conventional multiplex PCR results. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of the multiplex PCR reverse cross blot hybridization assay comparing to culture method was 86.03%, the specificity is 35.46%, the positive predictive value was 41.94% and the negative predictive value was 82.41%. For conventional multiplex PCR these values are 81.62%, 38.65%, 41.89%, 79.51%, respectively. Furthermore, in terms of mycobacteria species detection, the conventional multiplex PCR was relatively equal compared to the multiplex PCR reverse cross blot hybridization assay, and to be particularly having no significant discrepant results on the identification of Mycobacteria tuberculosis in both methods.
format Text
id pubmed-2853547
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28535472010-04-13 Detection and identification of mycobacteria in sputum from suspected tuberculosis patients Hatta, Mochammad Sultan, Andi Rofian Tandirogang, Nataniel BMC Res Notes Technical Note BACKGROUND: Detection of Tuberculosis agent like nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) species by culture and microscopic methods remains difficult and time consuming. A fast and reliable diagnosis of tuberculosis would greatly improve the control of the disease. The purpose of this study is to compare the conventional multiplex PCR and multiplex PCR reverse cross blot hybridization assay to culture method in terms of mycobacteria species detection. FINDINGS: Among the 117 positively cultured samples, nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) species were found in 9 samples of multiplex PCR reverse cross blot hybridization assay; compared to only 3 NTM species found in our conventional multiplex PCR, and 13 NTM species were successfully identified among 162 negatively cultured samples compared to only 5 NTM species identification in conventional multiplex PCR results. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of the multiplex PCR reverse cross blot hybridization assay comparing to culture method was 86.03%, the specificity is 35.46%, the positive predictive value was 41.94% and the negative predictive value was 82.41%. For conventional multiplex PCR these values are 81.62%, 38.65%, 41.89%, 79.51%, respectively. Furthermore, in terms of mycobacteria species detection, the conventional multiplex PCR was relatively equal compared to the multiplex PCR reverse cross blot hybridization assay, and to be particularly having no significant discrepant results on the identification of Mycobacteria tuberculosis in both methods. BioMed Central 2010-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC2853547/ /pubmed/20233391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-3-72 Text en Copyright ©2010 Hatta et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Note
Hatta, Mochammad
Sultan, Andi Rofian
Tandirogang, Nataniel
Detection and identification of mycobacteria in sputum from suspected tuberculosis patients
title Detection and identification of mycobacteria in sputum from suspected tuberculosis patients
title_full Detection and identification of mycobacteria in sputum from suspected tuberculosis patients
title_fullStr Detection and identification of mycobacteria in sputum from suspected tuberculosis patients
title_full_unstemmed Detection and identification of mycobacteria in sputum from suspected tuberculosis patients
title_short Detection and identification of mycobacteria in sputum from suspected tuberculosis patients
title_sort detection and identification of mycobacteria in sputum from suspected tuberculosis patients
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2853547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20233391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-3-72
work_keys_str_mv AT hattamochammad detectionandidentificationofmycobacteriainsputumfromsuspectedtuberculosispatients
AT sultanandirofian detectionandidentificationofmycobacteriainsputumfromsuspectedtuberculosispatients
AT tandirogangnataniel detectionandidentificationofmycobacteriainsputumfromsuspectedtuberculosispatients
AT detectionandidentificationofmycobacteriainsputumfromsuspectedtuberculosispatients
AT detectionandidentificationofmycobacteriainsputumfromsuspectedtuberculosispatients