Cargando…

Evaluation of three PCR-based diagnostic assays for detecting mixed Plasmodium infection

BACKGROUND: One of the most commonly used molecular test for malaria diagnosis is the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based amplification of the 18S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) gene. Published diagnostic assays based on the 18S gene include the "gold standard" nested assay, semi-nested multiplex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mixson-Hayden, Tonya, Lucchi, Naomi W, Udhayakumar, Venkatachalam
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2853551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20356398
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-3-88
_version_ 1782180043647090688
author Mixson-Hayden, Tonya
Lucchi, Naomi W
Udhayakumar, Venkatachalam
author_facet Mixson-Hayden, Tonya
Lucchi, Naomi W
Udhayakumar, Venkatachalam
author_sort Mixson-Hayden, Tonya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: One of the most commonly used molecular test for malaria diagnosis is the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based amplification of the 18S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) gene. Published diagnostic assays based on the 18S gene include the "gold standard" nested assay, semi-nested multiplex assay, and one tube multiplex assay. To our knowledge, no one has reported whether the two multiplex methods are better at detecting mixed Plasmodium infections compared to the nested assay using known quantities of DNA in experimentally mixed cocktails. FINDINGS: Here we evaluated three PCR assays (nested, semi-nested multiplex, and one-tube multiplex) for the simultaneous detection of human malaria parasites using experimentally mixed cocktails of known quantities of laboratory derived DNA. All three assays detected individual species with high sensitivity and specificity when DNA was from any one single species; however, experimentally mixed DNA cocktails with all four species present were correctly identified most consistently with the nested method. The other two methods failed to consistently identify all four species correctly, especially at lower concentrations of DNA -subclinical levels of malaria (DNA equivalent to or less than 10 parasites per microliter). CONCLUSIONS: The nested PCR method remains the method of choice for the detection of mixed malaria infections and especially of sub-clinical infections. Further optimization and/or new molecular gene targets may improve the success rate of detecting multiple parasite species simultaneously using traditional PCR assays.
format Text
id pubmed-2853551
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28535512010-04-13 Evaluation of three PCR-based diagnostic assays for detecting mixed Plasmodium infection Mixson-Hayden, Tonya Lucchi, Naomi W Udhayakumar, Venkatachalam BMC Res Notes Short Report BACKGROUND: One of the most commonly used molecular test for malaria diagnosis is the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based amplification of the 18S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) gene. Published diagnostic assays based on the 18S gene include the "gold standard" nested assay, semi-nested multiplex assay, and one tube multiplex assay. To our knowledge, no one has reported whether the two multiplex methods are better at detecting mixed Plasmodium infections compared to the nested assay using known quantities of DNA in experimentally mixed cocktails. FINDINGS: Here we evaluated three PCR assays (nested, semi-nested multiplex, and one-tube multiplex) for the simultaneous detection of human malaria parasites using experimentally mixed cocktails of known quantities of laboratory derived DNA. All three assays detected individual species with high sensitivity and specificity when DNA was from any one single species; however, experimentally mixed DNA cocktails with all four species present were correctly identified most consistently with the nested method. The other two methods failed to consistently identify all four species correctly, especially at lower concentrations of DNA -subclinical levels of malaria (DNA equivalent to or less than 10 parasites per microliter). CONCLUSIONS: The nested PCR method remains the method of choice for the detection of mixed malaria infections and especially of sub-clinical infections. Further optimization and/or new molecular gene targets may improve the success rate of detecting multiple parasite species simultaneously using traditional PCR assays. BioMed Central 2010-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC2853551/ /pubmed/20356398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-3-88 Text en Copyright ©2010 Udhayakumar et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Report
Mixson-Hayden, Tonya
Lucchi, Naomi W
Udhayakumar, Venkatachalam
Evaluation of three PCR-based diagnostic assays for detecting mixed Plasmodium infection
title Evaluation of three PCR-based diagnostic assays for detecting mixed Plasmodium infection
title_full Evaluation of three PCR-based diagnostic assays for detecting mixed Plasmodium infection
title_fullStr Evaluation of three PCR-based diagnostic assays for detecting mixed Plasmodium infection
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of three PCR-based diagnostic assays for detecting mixed Plasmodium infection
title_short Evaluation of three PCR-based diagnostic assays for detecting mixed Plasmodium infection
title_sort evaluation of three pcr-based diagnostic assays for detecting mixed plasmodium infection
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2853551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20356398
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-3-88
work_keys_str_mv AT mixsonhaydentonya evaluationofthreepcrbaseddiagnosticassaysfordetectingmixedplasmodiuminfection
AT lucchinaomiw evaluationofthreepcrbaseddiagnosticassaysfordetectingmixedplasmodiuminfection
AT udhayakumarvenkatachalam evaluationofthreepcrbaseddiagnosticassaysfordetectingmixedplasmodiuminfection