Cargando…
Evaluation of three PCR-based diagnostic assays for detecting mixed Plasmodium infection
BACKGROUND: One of the most commonly used molecular test for malaria diagnosis is the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based amplification of the 18S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) gene. Published diagnostic assays based on the 18S gene include the "gold standard" nested assay, semi-nested multiplex...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2853551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20356398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-3-88 |
_version_ | 1782180043647090688 |
---|---|
author | Mixson-Hayden, Tonya Lucchi, Naomi W Udhayakumar, Venkatachalam |
author_facet | Mixson-Hayden, Tonya Lucchi, Naomi W Udhayakumar, Venkatachalam |
author_sort | Mixson-Hayden, Tonya |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: One of the most commonly used molecular test for malaria diagnosis is the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based amplification of the 18S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) gene. Published diagnostic assays based on the 18S gene include the "gold standard" nested assay, semi-nested multiplex assay, and one tube multiplex assay. To our knowledge, no one has reported whether the two multiplex methods are better at detecting mixed Plasmodium infections compared to the nested assay using known quantities of DNA in experimentally mixed cocktails. FINDINGS: Here we evaluated three PCR assays (nested, semi-nested multiplex, and one-tube multiplex) for the simultaneous detection of human malaria parasites using experimentally mixed cocktails of known quantities of laboratory derived DNA. All three assays detected individual species with high sensitivity and specificity when DNA was from any one single species; however, experimentally mixed DNA cocktails with all four species present were correctly identified most consistently with the nested method. The other two methods failed to consistently identify all four species correctly, especially at lower concentrations of DNA -subclinical levels of malaria (DNA equivalent to or less than 10 parasites per microliter). CONCLUSIONS: The nested PCR method remains the method of choice for the detection of mixed malaria infections and especially of sub-clinical infections. Further optimization and/or new molecular gene targets may improve the success rate of detecting multiple parasite species simultaneously using traditional PCR assays. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2853551 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28535512010-04-13 Evaluation of three PCR-based diagnostic assays for detecting mixed Plasmodium infection Mixson-Hayden, Tonya Lucchi, Naomi W Udhayakumar, Venkatachalam BMC Res Notes Short Report BACKGROUND: One of the most commonly used molecular test for malaria diagnosis is the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based amplification of the 18S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) gene. Published diagnostic assays based on the 18S gene include the "gold standard" nested assay, semi-nested multiplex assay, and one tube multiplex assay. To our knowledge, no one has reported whether the two multiplex methods are better at detecting mixed Plasmodium infections compared to the nested assay using known quantities of DNA in experimentally mixed cocktails. FINDINGS: Here we evaluated three PCR assays (nested, semi-nested multiplex, and one-tube multiplex) for the simultaneous detection of human malaria parasites using experimentally mixed cocktails of known quantities of laboratory derived DNA. All three assays detected individual species with high sensitivity and specificity when DNA was from any one single species; however, experimentally mixed DNA cocktails with all four species present were correctly identified most consistently with the nested method. The other two methods failed to consistently identify all four species correctly, especially at lower concentrations of DNA -subclinical levels of malaria (DNA equivalent to or less than 10 parasites per microliter). CONCLUSIONS: The nested PCR method remains the method of choice for the detection of mixed malaria infections and especially of sub-clinical infections. Further optimization and/or new molecular gene targets may improve the success rate of detecting multiple parasite species simultaneously using traditional PCR assays. BioMed Central 2010-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC2853551/ /pubmed/20356398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-3-88 Text en Copyright ©2010 Udhayakumar et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Short Report Mixson-Hayden, Tonya Lucchi, Naomi W Udhayakumar, Venkatachalam Evaluation of three PCR-based diagnostic assays for detecting mixed Plasmodium infection |
title | Evaluation of three PCR-based diagnostic assays for detecting mixed Plasmodium infection |
title_full | Evaluation of three PCR-based diagnostic assays for detecting mixed Plasmodium infection |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of three PCR-based diagnostic assays for detecting mixed Plasmodium infection |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of three PCR-based diagnostic assays for detecting mixed Plasmodium infection |
title_short | Evaluation of three PCR-based diagnostic assays for detecting mixed Plasmodium infection |
title_sort | evaluation of three pcr-based diagnostic assays for detecting mixed plasmodium infection |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2853551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20356398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-3-88 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mixsonhaydentonya evaluationofthreepcrbaseddiagnosticassaysfordetectingmixedplasmodiuminfection AT lucchinaomiw evaluationofthreepcrbaseddiagnosticassaysfordetectingmixedplasmodiuminfection AT udhayakumarvenkatachalam evaluationofthreepcrbaseddiagnosticassaysfordetectingmixedplasmodiuminfection |