Cargando…
The need for intra aortic balloon pump support following open heart surgery: risk analysis and outcome
BACKGROUND: The early and intermediate outcome of patients requiring intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) was studied in a cohort of 2697 adult cardiac surgical patients. METHODS: 136 patients requiring IABP (5.04%) support analysed over a 4 year period. Prospective data collection, obtained. RESULTS: Th...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2855563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20367880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-5-20 |
_version_ | 1782180198023692288 |
---|---|
author | Parissis, Haralabos Leotsinidis, Michael Akbar, Mohammad Tauqeer Apostolakis, Efstratios Dougenis, Dimitrios |
author_facet | Parissis, Haralabos Leotsinidis, Michael Akbar, Mohammad Tauqeer Apostolakis, Efstratios Dougenis, Dimitrios |
author_sort | Parissis, Haralabos |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The early and intermediate outcome of patients requiring intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) was studied in a cohort of 2697 adult cardiac surgical patients. METHODS: 136 patients requiring IABP (5.04%) support analysed over a 4 year period. Prospective data collection, obtained. RESULTS: The overall operative mortality was 35.3%. The "operation specific" mortality was higher on the Valve population. The mortality (%) as per time of balloon insertion was: Preoperative 18.2, Intraopeartive 33.3, postoperative 58.3 (p < 0.05). The incremental risk factors for death were: Female gender (Odds Ratio (OR) = 3.87 with Confidence Intervals (CI) = 1.3-11.6), Smoking (OR = 4.88, CI = 1.23- 19.37), Preoperative Creatinine>120 (OR = 3.3, CI = 1.14-9.7), Cross Clamp time>80 min (OR = 4.16, CI = 1.73-9.98) and IABP insertion postoperatively (OR = 19.19, CI = 3.16-116.47). The incremental risk factors for the development of complications were: Poor EF (OR = 3.16, CI = 0.87-11.52), Euroscore >7 (OR = 2.99, CI = 1.14-7.88), history of PVD (OR = 4.99, CI = 1.32-18.86). The 5 years survival was 79.2% for the CABG population and 71.5% for the valve group. (Hazard ratio = 1.78, CI = 0.92-3.46). CONCLUSIONS: IABP represents a safe option of supporting the failing heart. The need for IABP especially in a high risk Valve population is associated with early unfavourable outcome, however the positive mid term results further justify its use. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2855563 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28555632010-04-17 The need for intra aortic balloon pump support following open heart surgery: risk analysis and outcome Parissis, Haralabos Leotsinidis, Michael Akbar, Mohammad Tauqeer Apostolakis, Efstratios Dougenis, Dimitrios J Cardiothorac Surg Research article BACKGROUND: The early and intermediate outcome of patients requiring intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) was studied in a cohort of 2697 adult cardiac surgical patients. METHODS: 136 patients requiring IABP (5.04%) support analysed over a 4 year period. Prospective data collection, obtained. RESULTS: The overall operative mortality was 35.3%. The "operation specific" mortality was higher on the Valve population. The mortality (%) as per time of balloon insertion was: Preoperative 18.2, Intraopeartive 33.3, postoperative 58.3 (p < 0.05). The incremental risk factors for death were: Female gender (Odds Ratio (OR) = 3.87 with Confidence Intervals (CI) = 1.3-11.6), Smoking (OR = 4.88, CI = 1.23- 19.37), Preoperative Creatinine>120 (OR = 3.3, CI = 1.14-9.7), Cross Clamp time>80 min (OR = 4.16, CI = 1.73-9.98) and IABP insertion postoperatively (OR = 19.19, CI = 3.16-116.47). The incremental risk factors for the development of complications were: Poor EF (OR = 3.16, CI = 0.87-11.52), Euroscore >7 (OR = 2.99, CI = 1.14-7.88), history of PVD (OR = 4.99, CI = 1.32-18.86). The 5 years survival was 79.2% for the CABG population and 71.5% for the valve group. (Hazard ratio = 1.78, CI = 0.92-3.46). CONCLUSIONS: IABP represents a safe option of supporting the failing heart. The need for IABP especially in a high risk Valve population is associated with early unfavourable outcome, however the positive mid term results further justify its use. BioMed Central 2010-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2855563/ /pubmed/20367880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-5-20 Text en Copyright ©2010 Parissis et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research article Parissis, Haralabos Leotsinidis, Michael Akbar, Mohammad Tauqeer Apostolakis, Efstratios Dougenis, Dimitrios The need for intra aortic balloon pump support following open heart surgery: risk analysis and outcome |
title | The need for intra aortic balloon pump support following open heart surgery: risk analysis and outcome |
title_full | The need for intra aortic balloon pump support following open heart surgery: risk analysis and outcome |
title_fullStr | The need for intra aortic balloon pump support following open heart surgery: risk analysis and outcome |
title_full_unstemmed | The need for intra aortic balloon pump support following open heart surgery: risk analysis and outcome |
title_short | The need for intra aortic balloon pump support following open heart surgery: risk analysis and outcome |
title_sort | need for intra aortic balloon pump support following open heart surgery: risk analysis and outcome |
topic | Research article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2855563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20367880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-5-20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parissisharalabos theneedforintraaorticballoonpumpsupportfollowingopenheartsurgeryriskanalysisandoutcome AT leotsinidismichael theneedforintraaorticballoonpumpsupportfollowingopenheartsurgeryriskanalysisandoutcome AT akbarmohammadtauqeer theneedforintraaorticballoonpumpsupportfollowingopenheartsurgeryriskanalysisandoutcome AT apostolakisefstratios theneedforintraaorticballoonpumpsupportfollowingopenheartsurgeryriskanalysisandoutcome AT dougenisdimitrios theneedforintraaorticballoonpumpsupportfollowingopenheartsurgeryriskanalysisandoutcome AT parissisharalabos needforintraaorticballoonpumpsupportfollowingopenheartsurgeryriskanalysisandoutcome AT leotsinidismichael needforintraaorticballoonpumpsupportfollowingopenheartsurgeryriskanalysisandoutcome AT akbarmohammadtauqeer needforintraaorticballoonpumpsupportfollowingopenheartsurgeryriskanalysisandoutcome AT apostolakisefstratios needforintraaorticballoonpumpsupportfollowingopenheartsurgeryriskanalysisandoutcome AT dougenisdimitrios needforintraaorticballoonpumpsupportfollowingopenheartsurgeryriskanalysisandoutcome |