Cargando…

Comparison of defined culture systems for feeder cell free propagation of human embryonic stem cells

There are many reports of defined culture systems for the propagation of human embryonic stem cells in the absence of feeder cell support, but no previous study has undertaken a multi-laboratory comparison of these diverse methodologies. In this study, five separate laboratories, each with experienc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akopian, Veronika, Andrews, Peter W., Beil, Stephen, Benvenisty, Nissim, Brehm, Jennifer, Christie, Megan, Ford, Angela, Fox, Victoria, Gokhale, Paul J., Healy, Lyn, Holm, Frida, Hovatta, Outi, Knowles, Barbara B., Ludwig, Tenneille E., McKay, Ronald D. G., Miyazaki, Takamichi, Nakatsuji, Norio, Oh, Steve K. W., Pera, Martin F., Rossant, Janet, Stacey, Glyn N., Suemori, Hirofumi
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2855804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20186512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11626-010-9297-z
_version_ 1782180210873991168
author Akopian, Veronika
Andrews, Peter W.
Beil, Stephen
Benvenisty, Nissim
Brehm, Jennifer
Christie, Megan
Ford, Angela
Fox, Victoria
Gokhale, Paul J.
Healy, Lyn
Holm, Frida
Hovatta, Outi
Knowles, Barbara B.
Ludwig, Tenneille E.
McKay, Ronald D. G.
Miyazaki, Takamichi
Nakatsuji, Norio
Oh, Steve K. W.
Pera, Martin F.
Rossant, Janet
Stacey, Glyn N.
Suemori, Hirofumi
author_facet Akopian, Veronika
Andrews, Peter W.
Beil, Stephen
Benvenisty, Nissim
Brehm, Jennifer
Christie, Megan
Ford, Angela
Fox, Victoria
Gokhale, Paul J.
Healy, Lyn
Holm, Frida
Hovatta, Outi
Knowles, Barbara B.
Ludwig, Tenneille E.
McKay, Ronald D. G.
Miyazaki, Takamichi
Nakatsuji, Norio
Oh, Steve K. W.
Pera, Martin F.
Rossant, Janet
Stacey, Glyn N.
Suemori, Hirofumi
collection PubMed
description There are many reports of defined culture systems for the propagation of human embryonic stem cells in the absence of feeder cell support, but no previous study has undertaken a multi-laboratory comparison of these diverse methodologies. In this study, five separate laboratories, each with experience in human embryonic stem cell culture, used a panel of ten embryonic stem cell lines (including WA09 as an index cell line common to all laboratories) to assess eight cell culture methods, with propagation in the presence of Knockout Serum Replacer, FGF-2, and mouse embryonic fibroblast feeder cell layers serving as a positive control. The cultures were assessed for up to ten passages for attachment, death, and differentiated morphology by phase contrast microscopy, for growth by serial cell counts, and for maintenance of stem cell surface marker expression by flow cytometry. Of the eight culture systems, only the control and those based on two commercial media, mTeSR1 and STEMPRO, supported maintenance of most cell lines for ten passages. Cultures grown in the remaining media failed before this point due to lack of attachment, cell death, or overt cell differentiation. Possible explanations for relative success of the commercial formulations in this study, and the lack of success with other formulations from academic groups compared to previously published results, include: the complex combination of growth factors present in the commercial preparations; improved development, manufacture, and quality control in the commercial products; differences in epigenetic adaptation to culture in vitro between different ES cell lines grown in different laboratories.
format Text
id pubmed-2855804
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28558042010-04-25 Comparison of defined culture systems for feeder cell free propagation of human embryonic stem cells Akopian, Veronika Andrews, Peter W. Beil, Stephen Benvenisty, Nissim Brehm, Jennifer Christie, Megan Ford, Angela Fox, Victoria Gokhale, Paul J. Healy, Lyn Holm, Frida Hovatta, Outi Knowles, Barbara B. Ludwig, Tenneille E. McKay, Ronald D. G. Miyazaki, Takamichi Nakatsuji, Norio Oh, Steve K. W. Pera, Martin F. Rossant, Janet Stacey, Glyn N. Suemori, Hirofumi In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim Article There are many reports of defined culture systems for the propagation of human embryonic stem cells in the absence of feeder cell support, but no previous study has undertaken a multi-laboratory comparison of these diverse methodologies. In this study, five separate laboratories, each with experience in human embryonic stem cell culture, used a panel of ten embryonic stem cell lines (including WA09 as an index cell line common to all laboratories) to assess eight cell culture methods, with propagation in the presence of Knockout Serum Replacer, FGF-2, and mouse embryonic fibroblast feeder cell layers serving as a positive control. The cultures were assessed for up to ten passages for attachment, death, and differentiated morphology by phase contrast microscopy, for growth by serial cell counts, and for maintenance of stem cell surface marker expression by flow cytometry. Of the eight culture systems, only the control and those based on two commercial media, mTeSR1 and STEMPRO, supported maintenance of most cell lines for ten passages. Cultures grown in the remaining media failed before this point due to lack of attachment, cell death, or overt cell differentiation. Possible explanations for relative success of the commercial formulations in this study, and the lack of success with other formulations from academic groups compared to previously published results, include: the complex combination of growth factors present in the commercial preparations; improved development, manufacture, and quality control in the commercial products; differences in epigenetic adaptation to culture in vitro between different ES cell lines grown in different laboratories. Springer-Verlag 2010-02-26 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2855804/ /pubmed/20186512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11626-010-9297-z Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Akopian, Veronika
Andrews, Peter W.
Beil, Stephen
Benvenisty, Nissim
Brehm, Jennifer
Christie, Megan
Ford, Angela
Fox, Victoria
Gokhale, Paul J.
Healy, Lyn
Holm, Frida
Hovatta, Outi
Knowles, Barbara B.
Ludwig, Tenneille E.
McKay, Ronald D. G.
Miyazaki, Takamichi
Nakatsuji, Norio
Oh, Steve K. W.
Pera, Martin F.
Rossant, Janet
Stacey, Glyn N.
Suemori, Hirofumi
Comparison of defined culture systems for feeder cell free propagation of human embryonic stem cells
title Comparison of defined culture systems for feeder cell free propagation of human embryonic stem cells
title_full Comparison of defined culture systems for feeder cell free propagation of human embryonic stem cells
title_fullStr Comparison of defined culture systems for feeder cell free propagation of human embryonic stem cells
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of defined culture systems for feeder cell free propagation of human embryonic stem cells
title_short Comparison of defined culture systems for feeder cell free propagation of human embryonic stem cells
title_sort comparison of defined culture systems for feeder cell free propagation of human embryonic stem cells
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2855804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20186512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11626-010-9297-z
work_keys_str_mv AT comparisonofdefinedculturesystemsforfeedercellfreepropagationofhumanembryonicstemcells
AT akopianveronika comparisonofdefinedculturesystemsforfeedercellfreepropagationofhumanembryonicstemcells
AT andrewspeterw comparisonofdefinedculturesystemsforfeedercellfreepropagationofhumanembryonicstemcells
AT beilstephen comparisonofdefinedculturesystemsforfeedercellfreepropagationofhumanembryonicstemcells
AT benvenistynissim comparisonofdefinedculturesystemsforfeedercellfreepropagationofhumanembryonicstemcells
AT brehmjennifer comparisonofdefinedculturesystemsforfeedercellfreepropagationofhumanembryonicstemcells
AT christiemegan comparisonofdefinedculturesystemsforfeedercellfreepropagationofhumanembryonicstemcells
AT fordangela comparisonofdefinedculturesystemsforfeedercellfreepropagationofhumanembryonicstemcells
AT foxvictoria comparisonofdefinedculturesystemsforfeedercellfreepropagationofhumanembryonicstemcells
AT gokhalepaulj comparisonofdefinedculturesystemsforfeedercellfreepropagationofhumanembryonicstemcells
AT healylyn comparisonofdefinedculturesystemsforfeedercellfreepropagationofhumanembryonicstemcells
AT holmfrida comparisonofdefinedculturesystemsforfeedercellfreepropagationofhumanembryonicstemcells
AT hovattaouti comparisonofdefinedculturesystemsforfeedercellfreepropagationofhumanembryonicstemcells
AT knowlesbarbarab comparisonofdefinedculturesystemsforfeedercellfreepropagationofhumanembryonicstemcells
AT ludwigtenneillee comparisonofdefinedculturesystemsforfeedercellfreepropagationofhumanembryonicstemcells
AT mckayronalddg comparisonofdefinedculturesystemsforfeedercellfreepropagationofhumanembryonicstemcells
AT miyazakitakamichi comparisonofdefinedculturesystemsforfeedercellfreepropagationofhumanembryonicstemcells
AT nakatsujinorio comparisonofdefinedculturesystemsforfeedercellfreepropagationofhumanembryonicstemcells
AT ohstevekw comparisonofdefinedculturesystemsforfeedercellfreepropagationofhumanembryonicstemcells
AT peramartinf comparisonofdefinedculturesystemsforfeedercellfreepropagationofhumanembryonicstemcells
AT rossantjanet comparisonofdefinedculturesystemsforfeedercellfreepropagationofhumanembryonicstemcells
AT staceyglynn comparisonofdefinedculturesystemsforfeedercellfreepropagationofhumanembryonicstemcells
AT suemorihirofumi comparisonofdefinedculturesystemsforfeedercellfreepropagationofhumanembryonicstemcells