Cargando…
Defining research priorities for pancreatic cancer in Australia: results of a consensus development process
INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic cancer (PC) is the sixth leading cause of cancer death in Australia and the fourth in the United States, yet research in PC is lagging behind that in other cancers associated with a high disease burden. In the absence of agreed processes to reliably identify research areas w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2855814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20072807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-010-9501-1 |
_version_ | 1782180213257404416 |
---|---|
author | Robotin, Monica C. Jones, Sandra C. Biankin, Andrew V. Waters, Louise Iverson, Don Gooden, Helen Barraclough, Bruce Penman, Andrew G. |
author_facet | Robotin, Monica C. Jones, Sandra C. Biankin, Andrew V. Waters, Louise Iverson, Don Gooden, Helen Barraclough, Bruce Penman, Andrew G. |
author_sort | Robotin, Monica C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic cancer (PC) is the sixth leading cause of cancer death in Australia and the fourth in the United States, yet research in PC is lagging behind that in other cancers associated with a high disease burden. In the absence of agreed processes to reliably identify research areas which can deliver significant advances in PC research, the Cancer Council NSW established a strategic partnership with the NSW Pancreatic Cancer Network to define critical research issues and opportunities that could accelerate progress in this field in Australia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The process consisted of five distinct stages: a literature review on recent progress in PC research, semi-structured expert interviews, a Delphi process, consumer focus groups, and a nominal group process. Information collected at each step informed the development of subsequent stages. RESULTS: The results from these steps were refined by the nominal group into a set of seven specific pancreatic cancer research goals. The goals were disseminated and led to a new funding scheme for key PC research priorities. DISCUSSION: This prioritisation exercise provided a much needed “road map” for research prioritisation in PC and served as a checklist to researchers applying for PC research grants to confirm how their research can contribute towards accelerating progress in PC research in Australia. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2855814 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28558142010-04-25 Defining research priorities for pancreatic cancer in Australia: results of a consensus development process Robotin, Monica C. Jones, Sandra C. Biankin, Andrew V. Waters, Louise Iverson, Don Gooden, Helen Barraclough, Bruce Penman, Andrew G. Cancer Causes Control Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic cancer (PC) is the sixth leading cause of cancer death in Australia and the fourth in the United States, yet research in PC is lagging behind that in other cancers associated with a high disease burden. In the absence of agreed processes to reliably identify research areas which can deliver significant advances in PC research, the Cancer Council NSW established a strategic partnership with the NSW Pancreatic Cancer Network to define critical research issues and opportunities that could accelerate progress in this field in Australia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The process consisted of five distinct stages: a literature review on recent progress in PC research, semi-structured expert interviews, a Delphi process, consumer focus groups, and a nominal group process. Information collected at each step informed the development of subsequent stages. RESULTS: The results from these steps were refined by the nominal group into a set of seven specific pancreatic cancer research goals. The goals were disseminated and led to a new funding scheme for key PC research priorities. DISCUSSION: This prioritisation exercise provided a much needed “road map” for research prioritisation in PC and served as a checklist to researchers applying for PC research grants to confirm how their research can contribute towards accelerating progress in PC research in Australia. Springer Netherlands 2010-01-14 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2855814/ /pubmed/20072807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-010-9501-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Robotin, Monica C. Jones, Sandra C. Biankin, Andrew V. Waters, Louise Iverson, Don Gooden, Helen Barraclough, Bruce Penman, Andrew G. Defining research priorities for pancreatic cancer in Australia: results of a consensus development process |
title | Defining research priorities for pancreatic cancer in Australia: results of a consensus development process |
title_full | Defining research priorities for pancreatic cancer in Australia: results of a consensus development process |
title_fullStr | Defining research priorities for pancreatic cancer in Australia: results of a consensus development process |
title_full_unstemmed | Defining research priorities for pancreatic cancer in Australia: results of a consensus development process |
title_short | Defining research priorities for pancreatic cancer in Australia: results of a consensus development process |
title_sort | defining research priorities for pancreatic cancer in australia: results of a consensus development process |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2855814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20072807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-010-9501-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT robotinmonicac definingresearchprioritiesforpancreaticcancerinaustraliaresultsofaconsensusdevelopmentprocess AT jonessandrac definingresearchprioritiesforpancreaticcancerinaustraliaresultsofaconsensusdevelopmentprocess AT biankinandrewv definingresearchprioritiesforpancreaticcancerinaustraliaresultsofaconsensusdevelopmentprocess AT waterslouise definingresearchprioritiesforpancreaticcancerinaustraliaresultsofaconsensusdevelopmentprocess AT iversondon definingresearchprioritiesforpancreaticcancerinaustraliaresultsofaconsensusdevelopmentprocess AT goodenhelen definingresearchprioritiesforpancreaticcancerinaustraliaresultsofaconsensusdevelopmentprocess AT barracloughbruce definingresearchprioritiesforpancreaticcancerinaustraliaresultsofaconsensusdevelopmentprocess AT penmanandrewg definingresearchprioritiesforpancreaticcancerinaustraliaresultsofaconsensusdevelopmentprocess |