Cargando…

Defining research priorities for pancreatic cancer in Australia: results of a consensus development process

INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic cancer (PC) is the sixth leading cause of cancer death in Australia and the fourth in the United States, yet research in PC is lagging behind that in other cancers associated with a high disease burden. In the absence of agreed processes to reliably identify research areas w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robotin, Monica C., Jones, Sandra C., Biankin, Andrew V., Waters, Louise, Iverson, Don, Gooden, Helen, Barraclough, Bruce, Penman, Andrew G.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2855814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20072807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-010-9501-1
_version_ 1782180213257404416
author Robotin, Monica C.
Jones, Sandra C.
Biankin, Andrew V.
Waters, Louise
Iverson, Don
Gooden, Helen
Barraclough, Bruce
Penman, Andrew G.
author_facet Robotin, Monica C.
Jones, Sandra C.
Biankin, Andrew V.
Waters, Louise
Iverson, Don
Gooden, Helen
Barraclough, Bruce
Penman, Andrew G.
author_sort Robotin, Monica C.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic cancer (PC) is the sixth leading cause of cancer death in Australia and the fourth in the United States, yet research in PC is lagging behind that in other cancers associated with a high disease burden. In the absence of agreed processes to reliably identify research areas which can deliver significant advances in PC research, the Cancer Council NSW established a strategic partnership with the NSW Pancreatic Cancer Network to define critical research issues and opportunities that could accelerate progress in this field in Australia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The process consisted of five distinct stages: a literature review on recent progress in PC research, semi-structured expert interviews, a Delphi process, consumer focus groups, and a nominal group process. Information collected at each step informed the development of subsequent stages. RESULTS: The results from these steps were refined by the nominal group into a set of seven specific pancreatic cancer research goals. The goals were disseminated and led to a new funding scheme for key PC research priorities. DISCUSSION: This prioritisation exercise provided a much needed “road map” for research prioritisation in PC and served as a checklist to researchers applying for PC research grants to confirm how their research can contribute towards accelerating progress in PC research in Australia.
format Text
id pubmed-2855814
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28558142010-04-25 Defining research priorities for pancreatic cancer in Australia: results of a consensus development process Robotin, Monica C. Jones, Sandra C. Biankin, Andrew V. Waters, Louise Iverson, Don Gooden, Helen Barraclough, Bruce Penman, Andrew G. Cancer Causes Control Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic cancer (PC) is the sixth leading cause of cancer death in Australia and the fourth in the United States, yet research in PC is lagging behind that in other cancers associated with a high disease burden. In the absence of agreed processes to reliably identify research areas which can deliver significant advances in PC research, the Cancer Council NSW established a strategic partnership with the NSW Pancreatic Cancer Network to define critical research issues and opportunities that could accelerate progress in this field in Australia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The process consisted of five distinct stages: a literature review on recent progress in PC research, semi-structured expert interviews, a Delphi process, consumer focus groups, and a nominal group process. Information collected at each step informed the development of subsequent stages. RESULTS: The results from these steps were refined by the nominal group into a set of seven specific pancreatic cancer research goals. The goals were disseminated and led to a new funding scheme for key PC research priorities. DISCUSSION: This prioritisation exercise provided a much needed “road map” for research prioritisation in PC and served as a checklist to researchers applying for PC research grants to confirm how their research can contribute towards accelerating progress in PC research in Australia. Springer Netherlands 2010-01-14 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2855814/ /pubmed/20072807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-010-9501-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Robotin, Monica C.
Jones, Sandra C.
Biankin, Andrew V.
Waters, Louise
Iverson, Don
Gooden, Helen
Barraclough, Bruce
Penman, Andrew G.
Defining research priorities for pancreatic cancer in Australia: results of a consensus development process
title Defining research priorities for pancreatic cancer in Australia: results of a consensus development process
title_full Defining research priorities for pancreatic cancer in Australia: results of a consensus development process
title_fullStr Defining research priorities for pancreatic cancer in Australia: results of a consensus development process
title_full_unstemmed Defining research priorities for pancreatic cancer in Australia: results of a consensus development process
title_short Defining research priorities for pancreatic cancer in Australia: results of a consensus development process
title_sort defining research priorities for pancreatic cancer in australia: results of a consensus development process
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2855814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20072807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-010-9501-1
work_keys_str_mv AT robotinmonicac definingresearchprioritiesforpancreaticcancerinaustraliaresultsofaconsensusdevelopmentprocess
AT jonessandrac definingresearchprioritiesforpancreaticcancerinaustraliaresultsofaconsensusdevelopmentprocess
AT biankinandrewv definingresearchprioritiesforpancreaticcancerinaustraliaresultsofaconsensusdevelopmentprocess
AT waterslouise definingresearchprioritiesforpancreaticcancerinaustraliaresultsofaconsensusdevelopmentprocess
AT iversondon definingresearchprioritiesforpancreaticcancerinaustraliaresultsofaconsensusdevelopmentprocess
AT goodenhelen definingresearchprioritiesforpancreaticcancerinaustraliaresultsofaconsensusdevelopmentprocess
AT barracloughbruce definingresearchprioritiesforpancreaticcancerinaustraliaresultsofaconsensusdevelopmentprocess
AT penmanandrewg definingresearchprioritiesforpancreaticcancerinaustraliaresultsofaconsensusdevelopmentprocess