Cargando…
Current sample size conventions: Flaws, harms, and alternatives
BACKGROUND: The belief remains widespread that medical research studies must have statistical power of at least 80% in order to be scientifically sound, and peer reviewers often question whether power is high enough. DISCUSSION: This requirement and the methods for meeting it have severe flaws. Nota...
Autor principal: | Bacchetti, Peter |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2856520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20307281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-17 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Flaws in advance directives that request withdrawing assisted feeding in late-stage dementia may cause premature or prolonged dying
por: Terman, Stanley A., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
The Flaws and Human Harms of Animal Experimentation
por: AKHTAR, AYSHA
Publicado: (2015) -
New approaches to cope with possible harms of low-dose environmental chemicals
por: Lee, Duk-Hee, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Prioritizing policy interventions to improve diets? Will it work, can it happen, will it do harm?
por: Snowdon, W., et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
First do no harm: uterine natural killer (NK) cells in assisted reproduction
por: Moffett, Ashley, et al.
Publicado: (2015)