Cargando…

Subsequent abdominal surgery after laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh: a single institution experience with 72 reoperations

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair (LVIHR) carries a risk of adhesion formation and can influence subsequent abdominal operations (SAOs). We performed a retrospective study of findings during reoperations of patients who had previously had an LVIHR by using an expanded polyte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wassenaar, E. B., Schoenmaeckers, E. J. P., Raymakers, J. T. F. J., Rakic, S.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2856851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19806422
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-009-0568-0
_version_ 1782180280790941696
author Wassenaar, E. B.
Schoenmaeckers, E. J. P.
Raymakers, J. T. F. J.
Rakic, S.
author_facet Wassenaar, E. B.
Schoenmaeckers, E. J. P.
Raymakers, J. T. F. J.
Rakic, S.
author_sort Wassenaar, E. B.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair (LVIHR) carries a risk of adhesion formation and can influence subsequent abdominal operations (SAOs). We performed a retrospective study of findings during reoperations of patients who had previously had an LVIHR by using an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh (DualMesh(®); WL Gore, Flagstaff, AZ, USA). METHODS: The medical records of all 695 patients who had LVIHR at our hospital were reviewed. Patients who underwent SAO for various indications were identified (n = 72) and analyzed. RESULTS: Seven LVIHR patients (1%) had early SAO (within a few days). In six patients (86%), removal of the mesh was required. Intra-operatively, in all six of these patients with peritonitis, there were no adhesions against the implant identified. Late SAOs (after more than 1 month) were performed in 65 patients (9.4%). Only one patient required acute surgical intervention due to an LVIHR-related adhesion (0.15%). Laparoscopy was performed in 83% and laparotomy in 17% of patients. Adhesions against the implant were present in 83% of patients; in 65%, the adhesions involved omentum only, and in 18%, they involved the bowel. Adhesiolysis was always easy and caused no inadvertent enterotomies. SAOs were devoid of postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: In this largest series of reoperations after LVIHR, the majority of patients had mild or moderate adhesions against the implant. The specific observations that: (1) no relaparoscopies had to be converted, (2) no inadvertent enterotomies were made during adhesiolysis, and (3) SAOs have practically been devoid of peri- and postoperative complications indicate that SAOs can be safely performed after previous LVIHR with DualMesh.
format Text
id pubmed-2856851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28568512010-04-27 Subsequent abdominal surgery after laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh: a single institution experience with 72 reoperations Wassenaar, E. B. Schoenmaeckers, E. J. P. Raymakers, J. T. F. J. Rakic, S. Hernia Original Article PURPOSE: Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair (LVIHR) carries a risk of adhesion formation and can influence subsequent abdominal operations (SAOs). We performed a retrospective study of findings during reoperations of patients who had previously had an LVIHR by using an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh (DualMesh(®); WL Gore, Flagstaff, AZ, USA). METHODS: The medical records of all 695 patients who had LVIHR at our hospital were reviewed. Patients who underwent SAO for various indications were identified (n = 72) and analyzed. RESULTS: Seven LVIHR patients (1%) had early SAO (within a few days). In six patients (86%), removal of the mesh was required. Intra-operatively, in all six of these patients with peritonitis, there were no adhesions against the implant identified. Late SAOs (after more than 1 month) were performed in 65 patients (9.4%). Only one patient required acute surgical intervention due to an LVIHR-related adhesion (0.15%). Laparoscopy was performed in 83% and laparotomy in 17% of patients. Adhesions against the implant were present in 83% of patients; in 65%, the adhesions involved omentum only, and in 18%, they involved the bowel. Adhesiolysis was always easy and caused no inadvertent enterotomies. SAOs were devoid of postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: In this largest series of reoperations after LVIHR, the majority of patients had mild or moderate adhesions against the implant. The specific observations that: (1) no relaparoscopies had to be converted, (2) no inadvertent enterotomies were made during adhesiolysis, and (3) SAOs have practically been devoid of peri- and postoperative complications indicate that SAOs can be safely performed after previous LVIHR with DualMesh. Springer-Verlag 2009-10-06 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2856851/ /pubmed/19806422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-009-0568-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2009 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Wassenaar, E. B.
Schoenmaeckers, E. J. P.
Raymakers, J. T. F. J.
Rakic, S.
Subsequent abdominal surgery after laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh: a single institution experience with 72 reoperations
title Subsequent abdominal surgery after laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh: a single institution experience with 72 reoperations
title_full Subsequent abdominal surgery after laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh: a single institution experience with 72 reoperations
title_fullStr Subsequent abdominal surgery after laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh: a single institution experience with 72 reoperations
title_full_unstemmed Subsequent abdominal surgery after laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh: a single institution experience with 72 reoperations
title_short Subsequent abdominal surgery after laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh: a single institution experience with 72 reoperations
title_sort subsequent abdominal surgery after laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh: a single institution experience with 72 reoperations
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2856851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19806422
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-009-0568-0
work_keys_str_mv AT wassenaareb subsequentabdominalsurgeryafterlaparoscopicventralandincisionalherniarepairwithanexpandedpolytetrafluoroethylenemeshasingleinstitutionexperiencewith72reoperations
AT schoenmaeckersejp subsequentabdominalsurgeryafterlaparoscopicventralandincisionalherniarepairwithanexpandedpolytetrafluoroethylenemeshasingleinstitutionexperiencewith72reoperations
AT raymakersjtfj subsequentabdominalsurgeryafterlaparoscopicventralandincisionalherniarepairwithanexpandedpolytetrafluoroethylenemeshasingleinstitutionexperiencewith72reoperations
AT rakics subsequentabdominalsurgeryafterlaparoscopicventralandincisionalherniarepairwithanexpandedpolytetrafluoroethylenemeshasingleinstitutionexperiencewith72reoperations