Cargando…

Management of Low-Grade Glioma

The optimal management of patients with low-grade glioma (LGG) is controversial. The controversy largely stems from the lack of well-designed clinical trials with adequate follow-up to account for the relatively long progression-free survival and overall survival of patients with LGG. Nonetheless, t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pouratian, Nader, Schiff, David
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Current Science Inc. 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2857752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20425038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11910-010-0105-7
_version_ 1782180340903706624
author Pouratian, Nader
Schiff, David
author_facet Pouratian, Nader
Schiff, David
author_sort Pouratian, Nader
collection PubMed
description The optimal management of patients with low-grade glioma (LGG) is controversial. The controversy largely stems from the lack of well-designed clinical trials with adequate follow-up to account for the relatively long progression-free survival and overall survival of patients with LGG. Nonetheless, the literature increasingly suggests that expectant management is no longer optimal. Rather, there is mounting evidence supporting active management including consideration of surgical resection, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, molecular and histopathologic characterization, and use of modern imaging techniques for monitoring and prognostication. In particular, there is growing evidence favoring extensive surgical resection and increasing interest in the role of chemotherapy (especially temozolomide) in the management of these tumors. In this review, we critically analyze emerging trends in the literature with respect to management of LGG, with particular emphasis on reports published during the past year.
format Text
id pubmed-2857752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Current Science Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28577522010-04-27 Management of Low-Grade Glioma Pouratian, Nader Schiff, David Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep Article The optimal management of patients with low-grade glioma (LGG) is controversial. The controversy largely stems from the lack of well-designed clinical trials with adequate follow-up to account for the relatively long progression-free survival and overall survival of patients with LGG. Nonetheless, the literature increasingly suggests that expectant management is no longer optimal. Rather, there is mounting evidence supporting active management including consideration of surgical resection, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, molecular and histopathologic characterization, and use of modern imaging techniques for monitoring and prognostication. In particular, there is growing evidence favoring extensive surgical resection and increasing interest in the role of chemotherapy (especially temozolomide) in the management of these tumors. In this review, we critically analyze emerging trends in the literature with respect to management of LGG, with particular emphasis on reports published during the past year. Current Science Inc. 2010-03-18 2010-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2857752/ /pubmed/20425038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11910-010-0105-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2010
spellingShingle Article
Pouratian, Nader
Schiff, David
Management of Low-Grade Glioma
title Management of Low-Grade Glioma
title_full Management of Low-Grade Glioma
title_fullStr Management of Low-Grade Glioma
title_full_unstemmed Management of Low-Grade Glioma
title_short Management of Low-Grade Glioma
title_sort management of low-grade glioma
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2857752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20425038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11910-010-0105-7
work_keys_str_mv AT pouratiannader managementoflowgradeglioma
AT schiffdavid managementoflowgradeglioma