Cargando…

Single Cell Analysis of Transcriptional Activation Dynamics

BACKGROUND: Gene activation is thought to occur through a series of temporally defined regulatory steps. However, this process has not been completely evaluated in single living mammalian cells. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: To investigate the timing and coordination of gene activation events, we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rafalska-Metcalf, Ilona U., Powers, Sara Lawrence, Joo, Lucy M., LeRoy, Gary, Janicki, Susan M.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2858074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20422051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010272
_version_ 1782180375819190272
author Rafalska-Metcalf, Ilona U.
Powers, Sara Lawrence
Joo, Lucy M.
LeRoy, Gary
Janicki, Susan M.
author_facet Rafalska-Metcalf, Ilona U.
Powers, Sara Lawrence
Joo, Lucy M.
LeRoy, Gary
Janicki, Susan M.
author_sort Rafalska-Metcalf, Ilona U.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gene activation is thought to occur through a series of temporally defined regulatory steps. However, this process has not been completely evaluated in single living mammalian cells. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: To investigate the timing and coordination of gene activation events, we tracked the recruitment of GCN5 (histone acetyltransferase), RNA polymerase II, Brd2 and Brd4 (acetyl-lysine binding proteins), in relation to a VP16-transcriptional activator, to a transcription site that can be visualized in single living cells. All accumulated rapidly with the VP16 activator as did the transcribed RNA. RNA was also detected at significantly more transcription sites in cells expressing the VP16-activator compared to a p53-activator. After α-amanitin pre-treatment, the VP16-activator, GCN5, and Brd2 are still recruited to the transcription site but the chromatin does not decondense. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This study demonstrates that a strong activator can rapidly overcome the condensed chromatin structure of an inactive transcription site and supercede the expected requirement for regulatory events to proceed in a temporally defined order. Additionally, activator strength determines the number of cells in which transcription is induced as well as the extent of chromatin decondensation. As chromatin decondensation is significantly reduced after α-amanitin pre-treatment, despite the recruitment of transcriptional activation factors, this provides further evidence that transcription drives large-scale chromatin decondensation.
format Text
id pubmed-2858074
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28580742010-04-26 Single Cell Analysis of Transcriptional Activation Dynamics Rafalska-Metcalf, Ilona U. Powers, Sara Lawrence Joo, Lucy M. LeRoy, Gary Janicki, Susan M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Gene activation is thought to occur through a series of temporally defined regulatory steps. However, this process has not been completely evaluated in single living mammalian cells. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: To investigate the timing and coordination of gene activation events, we tracked the recruitment of GCN5 (histone acetyltransferase), RNA polymerase II, Brd2 and Brd4 (acetyl-lysine binding proteins), in relation to a VP16-transcriptional activator, to a transcription site that can be visualized in single living cells. All accumulated rapidly with the VP16 activator as did the transcribed RNA. RNA was also detected at significantly more transcription sites in cells expressing the VP16-activator compared to a p53-activator. After α-amanitin pre-treatment, the VP16-activator, GCN5, and Brd2 are still recruited to the transcription site but the chromatin does not decondense. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This study demonstrates that a strong activator can rapidly overcome the condensed chromatin structure of an inactive transcription site and supercede the expected requirement for regulatory events to proceed in a temporally defined order. Additionally, activator strength determines the number of cells in which transcription is induced as well as the extent of chromatin decondensation. As chromatin decondensation is significantly reduced after α-amanitin pre-treatment, despite the recruitment of transcriptional activation factors, this provides further evidence that transcription drives large-scale chromatin decondensation. Public Library of Science 2010-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2858074/ /pubmed/20422051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010272 Text en Rafalska-Metcalf et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rafalska-Metcalf, Ilona U.
Powers, Sara Lawrence
Joo, Lucy M.
LeRoy, Gary
Janicki, Susan M.
Single Cell Analysis of Transcriptional Activation Dynamics
title Single Cell Analysis of Transcriptional Activation Dynamics
title_full Single Cell Analysis of Transcriptional Activation Dynamics
title_fullStr Single Cell Analysis of Transcriptional Activation Dynamics
title_full_unstemmed Single Cell Analysis of Transcriptional Activation Dynamics
title_short Single Cell Analysis of Transcriptional Activation Dynamics
title_sort single cell analysis of transcriptional activation dynamics
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2858074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20422051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010272
work_keys_str_mv AT rafalskametcalfilonau singlecellanalysisoftranscriptionalactivationdynamics
AT powerssaralawrence singlecellanalysisoftranscriptionalactivationdynamics
AT joolucym singlecellanalysisoftranscriptionalactivationdynamics
AT leroygary singlecellanalysisoftranscriptionalactivationdynamics
AT janickisusanm singlecellanalysisoftranscriptionalactivationdynamics