Cargando…

Effect of Prior Intensive Insulin Treatment During the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) on Peripheral Neuropathy in Type 1 Diabetes During the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) Study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of former intensive versus conventional insulin treatment on neuropathy in Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) intensive and conventional treatment subjects with type 1 diabetes 13–14 years after DCCT closeout, during which time the two groups had achiev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Albers, James W., Herman, William H., Pop-Busui, Rodica, Feldman, Eva L., Martin, Catherine L., Cleary, Patricia A., Waberski, Barbara H., Lachin, John M.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2858182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20150297
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1941
_version_ 1782180402029395968
author Albers, James W.
Herman, William H.
Pop-Busui, Rodica
Feldman, Eva L.
Martin, Catherine L.
Cleary, Patricia A.
Waberski, Barbara H.
Lachin, John M.
author_facet Albers, James W.
Herman, William H.
Pop-Busui, Rodica
Feldman, Eva L.
Martin, Catherine L.
Cleary, Patricia A.
Waberski, Barbara H.
Lachin, John M.
author_sort Albers, James W.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of former intensive versus conventional insulin treatment on neuropathy in Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) intensive and conventional treatment subjects with type 1 diabetes 13–14 years after DCCT closeout, during which time the two groups had achieved similar A1C levels. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Clinical and nerve conduction studies (NCSs) performed during the DCCT were repeated during the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study by examiners masked to treatment status on 603 former intensive and 583 former conventional treatment subjects. Clinical neuropathy was defined by symptoms, sensory signs, or reflex changes consistent with distal polyneuropathy and confirmed with NCS abnormalities involving two or more nerves among the median, peroneal, and sural nerves. RESULTS: The prevalence of neuropathy increased 13–14 years after DCCT closeout from 9 to 25% in former intensive and from 17 to 35% in former conventional treatment groups, but the difference between groups remained significant (P < 0.001), and the incidence of neuropathy remained lower among former intensive (22%) than former conventional (28%) treatment subjects (P = 0.0125). Analytic models of incident neuropathy that adjusted for differences in NCS results at DCCT closeout showed no significant risk reduction associated with former intensive treatment during follow-up (odds ratio 1.17 [95% CI 0.84–1.63]). However, a significant persistent treatment group effect was observed for several NCS measures. Longitudinal analyses of overall glycemic control showed a significant association between mean A1C and measures of incident and prevalent neuropathy. CONCLUSIONS: The benefits of former intensive insulin treatment persisted for 13–14 years after DCCT closeout and provide evidence of a durable effect of prior intensive treatment on neuropathy.
format Text
id pubmed-2858182
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher American Diabetes Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28581822011-05-01 Effect of Prior Intensive Insulin Treatment During the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) on Peripheral Neuropathy in Type 1 Diabetes During the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) Study Albers, James W. Herman, William H. Pop-Busui, Rodica Feldman, Eva L. Martin, Catherine L. Cleary, Patricia A. Waberski, Barbara H. Lachin, John M. Diabetes Care Original Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of former intensive versus conventional insulin treatment on neuropathy in Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) intensive and conventional treatment subjects with type 1 diabetes 13–14 years after DCCT closeout, during which time the two groups had achieved similar A1C levels. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Clinical and nerve conduction studies (NCSs) performed during the DCCT were repeated during the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study by examiners masked to treatment status on 603 former intensive and 583 former conventional treatment subjects. Clinical neuropathy was defined by symptoms, sensory signs, or reflex changes consistent with distal polyneuropathy and confirmed with NCS abnormalities involving two or more nerves among the median, peroneal, and sural nerves. RESULTS: The prevalence of neuropathy increased 13–14 years after DCCT closeout from 9 to 25% in former intensive and from 17 to 35% in former conventional treatment groups, but the difference between groups remained significant (P < 0.001), and the incidence of neuropathy remained lower among former intensive (22%) than former conventional (28%) treatment subjects (P = 0.0125). Analytic models of incident neuropathy that adjusted for differences in NCS results at DCCT closeout showed no significant risk reduction associated with former intensive treatment during follow-up (odds ratio 1.17 [95% CI 0.84–1.63]). However, a significant persistent treatment group effect was observed for several NCS measures. Longitudinal analyses of overall glycemic control showed a significant association between mean A1C and measures of incident and prevalent neuropathy. CONCLUSIONS: The benefits of former intensive insulin treatment persisted for 13–14 years after DCCT closeout and provide evidence of a durable effect of prior intensive treatment on neuropathy. American Diabetes Association 2010-05 2010-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2858182/ /pubmed/20150297 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1941 Text en © 2010 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.
spellingShingle Original Research
Albers, James W.
Herman, William H.
Pop-Busui, Rodica
Feldman, Eva L.
Martin, Catherine L.
Cleary, Patricia A.
Waberski, Barbara H.
Lachin, John M.
Effect of Prior Intensive Insulin Treatment During the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) on Peripheral Neuropathy in Type 1 Diabetes During the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) Study
title Effect of Prior Intensive Insulin Treatment During the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) on Peripheral Neuropathy in Type 1 Diabetes During the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) Study
title_full Effect of Prior Intensive Insulin Treatment During the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) on Peripheral Neuropathy in Type 1 Diabetes During the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) Study
title_fullStr Effect of Prior Intensive Insulin Treatment During the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) on Peripheral Neuropathy in Type 1 Diabetes During the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) Study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Prior Intensive Insulin Treatment During the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) on Peripheral Neuropathy in Type 1 Diabetes During the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) Study
title_short Effect of Prior Intensive Insulin Treatment During the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) on Peripheral Neuropathy in Type 1 Diabetes During the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) Study
title_sort effect of prior intensive insulin treatment during the diabetes control and complications trial (dcct) on peripheral neuropathy in type 1 diabetes during the epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications (edic) study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2858182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20150297
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1941
work_keys_str_mv AT albersjamesw effectofpriorintensiveinsulintreatmentduringthediabetescontrolandcomplicationstrialdcctonperipheralneuropathyintype1diabetesduringtheepidemiologyofdiabetesinterventionsandcomplicationsedicstudy
AT hermanwilliamh effectofpriorintensiveinsulintreatmentduringthediabetescontrolandcomplicationstrialdcctonperipheralneuropathyintype1diabetesduringtheepidemiologyofdiabetesinterventionsandcomplicationsedicstudy
AT popbusuirodica effectofpriorintensiveinsulintreatmentduringthediabetescontrolandcomplicationstrialdcctonperipheralneuropathyintype1diabetesduringtheepidemiologyofdiabetesinterventionsandcomplicationsedicstudy
AT feldmaneval effectofpriorintensiveinsulintreatmentduringthediabetescontrolandcomplicationstrialdcctonperipheralneuropathyintype1diabetesduringtheepidemiologyofdiabetesinterventionsandcomplicationsedicstudy
AT martincatherinel effectofpriorintensiveinsulintreatmentduringthediabetescontrolandcomplicationstrialdcctonperipheralneuropathyintype1diabetesduringtheepidemiologyofdiabetesinterventionsandcomplicationsedicstudy
AT clearypatriciaa effectofpriorintensiveinsulintreatmentduringthediabetescontrolandcomplicationstrialdcctonperipheralneuropathyintype1diabetesduringtheepidemiologyofdiabetesinterventionsandcomplicationsedicstudy
AT waberskibarbarah effectofpriorintensiveinsulintreatmentduringthediabetescontrolandcomplicationstrialdcctonperipheralneuropathyintype1diabetesduringtheepidemiologyofdiabetesinterventionsandcomplicationsedicstudy
AT lachinjohnm effectofpriorintensiveinsulintreatmentduringthediabetescontrolandcomplicationstrialdcctonperipheralneuropathyintype1diabetesduringtheepidemiologyofdiabetesinterventionsandcomplicationsedicstudy
AT effectofpriorintensiveinsulintreatmentduringthediabetescontrolandcomplicationstrialdcctonperipheralneuropathyintype1diabetesduringtheepidemiologyofdiabetesinterventionsandcomplicationsedicstudy