Cargando…

VNS in drug resistant epilepsy: preliminary report on a small group of patients

BACKGROUND: In 1997 Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) received approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of medically intractable partial epilepsy in people aged 12 years and older who are ineligible for resective epilepsy surgery. Although the exa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Franzoni, Emilio, Gentile, Valentina, Colonnelli, Maria Chiara, Brunetto, Daniela, Cecconi, Ilaria, Iero, Luisa, Moscano, Filomena C, Cordelli, Duccio M, Marchiani, Valentina
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2859348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20398284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1824-7288-36-30
_version_ 1782180497196056576
author Franzoni, Emilio
Gentile, Valentina
Colonnelli, Maria Chiara
Brunetto, Daniela
Cecconi, Ilaria
Iero, Luisa
Moscano, Filomena C
Cordelli, Duccio M
Marchiani, Valentina
author_facet Franzoni, Emilio
Gentile, Valentina
Colonnelli, Maria Chiara
Brunetto, Daniela
Cecconi, Ilaria
Iero, Luisa
Moscano, Filomena C
Cordelli, Duccio M
Marchiani, Valentina
author_sort Franzoni, Emilio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 1997 Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) received approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of medically intractable partial epilepsy in people aged 12 years and older who are ineligible for resective epilepsy surgery. Although the exact mechanisms of action are unknown, the use of VNS with children has increased, including those younger than 12 years of age, or those with generalized epilepsy. METHODS: We describe the outcome for the first group of nine patients, aged 8-28 years, who had pharmaco-resistant epilepsy and were treated with VNS. During the follow up, we gradually and slowly increased the parameters of the stimulation in order to assess the efficacy of VNS even at parameters which would usually be considered "non-therapeutic", along with possible side effects and changes in quality of life. RESULTS: At the last follow, up 1 patient was "seizures free", 3 were "very good responders", 3 were "good responders" and 2 were "non responders". We obtained an initial seizure reduction with low stimulation parameters, the highest current reached being 2.00 mA. This observation supports the possibility that, for younger patients, lower stimulation intensities than those commonly used in clinical practice for adults can be therapeutic. We also wanted to underline the reduction in seizure frequency (~91,7%) and the reduction in seizure duration (> 50%) in the patients affected by drug-resistant absence epilepsy. Adverse effects were mild, tolerable and, in most of cases, easily resolved by adjusting the stimulation parameters. Hoarseness of voice was the most frequent side effect. The improvements in the quality of life are relevant and seem to be independent of the VNS effect in controlling seizures. CONCLUSIONS: Our small experience seems to confirm the efficacy and safety of VNS in drug resistant partial and generalized epilepsy in developing age groups.
format Text
id pubmed-2859348
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28593482010-04-27 VNS in drug resistant epilepsy: preliminary report on a small group of patients Franzoni, Emilio Gentile, Valentina Colonnelli, Maria Chiara Brunetto, Daniela Cecconi, Ilaria Iero, Luisa Moscano, Filomena C Cordelli, Duccio M Marchiani, Valentina Ital J Pediatr Research BACKGROUND: In 1997 Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) received approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of medically intractable partial epilepsy in people aged 12 years and older who are ineligible for resective epilepsy surgery. Although the exact mechanisms of action are unknown, the use of VNS with children has increased, including those younger than 12 years of age, or those with generalized epilepsy. METHODS: We describe the outcome for the first group of nine patients, aged 8-28 years, who had pharmaco-resistant epilepsy and were treated with VNS. During the follow up, we gradually and slowly increased the parameters of the stimulation in order to assess the efficacy of VNS even at parameters which would usually be considered "non-therapeutic", along with possible side effects and changes in quality of life. RESULTS: At the last follow, up 1 patient was "seizures free", 3 were "very good responders", 3 were "good responders" and 2 were "non responders". We obtained an initial seizure reduction with low stimulation parameters, the highest current reached being 2.00 mA. This observation supports the possibility that, for younger patients, lower stimulation intensities than those commonly used in clinical practice for adults can be therapeutic. We also wanted to underline the reduction in seizure frequency (~91,7%) and the reduction in seizure duration (> 50%) in the patients affected by drug-resistant absence epilepsy. Adverse effects were mild, tolerable and, in most of cases, easily resolved by adjusting the stimulation parameters. Hoarseness of voice was the most frequent side effect. The improvements in the quality of life are relevant and seem to be independent of the VNS effect in controlling seizures. CONCLUSIONS: Our small experience seems to confirm the efficacy and safety of VNS in drug resistant partial and generalized epilepsy in developing age groups. BioMed Central 2010-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC2859348/ /pubmed/20398284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1824-7288-36-30 Text en Copyright ©2010 Franzoni et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Franzoni, Emilio
Gentile, Valentina
Colonnelli, Maria Chiara
Brunetto, Daniela
Cecconi, Ilaria
Iero, Luisa
Moscano, Filomena C
Cordelli, Duccio M
Marchiani, Valentina
VNS in drug resistant epilepsy: preliminary report on a small group of patients
title VNS in drug resistant epilepsy: preliminary report on a small group of patients
title_full VNS in drug resistant epilepsy: preliminary report on a small group of patients
title_fullStr VNS in drug resistant epilepsy: preliminary report on a small group of patients
title_full_unstemmed VNS in drug resistant epilepsy: preliminary report on a small group of patients
title_short VNS in drug resistant epilepsy: preliminary report on a small group of patients
title_sort vns in drug resistant epilepsy: preliminary report on a small group of patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2859348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20398284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1824-7288-36-30
work_keys_str_mv AT franzoniemilio vnsindrugresistantepilepsypreliminaryreportonasmallgroupofpatients
AT gentilevalentina vnsindrugresistantepilepsypreliminaryreportonasmallgroupofpatients
AT colonnellimariachiara vnsindrugresistantepilepsypreliminaryreportonasmallgroupofpatients
AT brunettodaniela vnsindrugresistantepilepsypreliminaryreportonasmallgroupofpatients
AT cecconiilaria vnsindrugresistantepilepsypreliminaryreportonasmallgroupofpatients
AT ieroluisa vnsindrugresistantepilepsypreliminaryreportonasmallgroupofpatients
AT moscanofilomenac vnsindrugresistantepilepsypreliminaryreportonasmallgroupofpatients
AT cordelliducciom vnsindrugresistantepilepsypreliminaryreportonasmallgroupofpatients
AT marchianivalentina vnsindrugresistantepilepsypreliminaryreportonasmallgroupofpatients