Cargando…
Lack of neo-sensitization to Pen a 1 in patients treated with mite sublingual immunotherapy
BACKGROUND: Some studies reported the possible induction of food allergy, caused by neo-sensitization to cross-reacting allergens, during immunotherapy with aeroallergens, while other studies ruled out such possibility. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the development of neo-sensiti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2859740/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20230633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7961-8-4 |
_version_ | 1782180529958813696 |
---|---|
author | Rossi, Renato E Monasterolo, Giorgio Incorvaia, Cristoforo Moingeon, Philippe Frati, Franco Passalacqua, Giovanni Rossi, Lucilla Canonica, Giorgio W |
author_facet | Rossi, Renato E Monasterolo, Giorgio Incorvaia, Cristoforo Moingeon, Philippe Frati, Franco Passalacqua, Giovanni Rossi, Lucilla Canonica, Giorgio W |
author_sort | Rossi, Renato E |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Some studies reported the possible induction of food allergy, caused by neo-sensitization to cross-reacting allergens, during immunotherapy with aeroallergens, while other studies ruled out such possibility. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the development of neo-sensitization to Pen a 1 (tropomyosin) as well as the appearance of reactions after ingestion of foods containing tropomyosin as a consequence of sublingual mite immunization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Specific IgE to Tropomyosin (rPen a 1) before and after mite sublingual immunotherapy in 134 subjects were measured. IgE-specific antibodies for mite extract and recombinant allergen Pen a 1 were evaluated using the immunoenzymatic CAP system (Phadia Diagnostics, Milan, Italy). RESULTS: All patients had rPen a 1 IgE negative results before and after mite SLIT and did not show positive shrimp extract skin reactivity and serological rPen a 1 IgE conversion after treatment. More important, no patient showed systemic reactions to crustacean ingestion. CONCLUSIONS: Patients did not show neo-sensitization to tropomyosin, a component of the extract (namely mite group 10) administered. An assessment of a patient's possible pre-existing sensitisation to tropomyosin by skin test and/or specific IgE prior to start mite extract immunotherapy is recommended. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered in EudraCT, with the ID number of 2010-02035531. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2859740 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28597402010-04-27 Lack of neo-sensitization to Pen a 1 in patients treated with mite sublingual immunotherapy Rossi, Renato E Monasterolo, Giorgio Incorvaia, Cristoforo Moingeon, Philippe Frati, Franco Passalacqua, Giovanni Rossi, Lucilla Canonica, Giorgio W Clin Mol Allergy Research BACKGROUND: Some studies reported the possible induction of food allergy, caused by neo-sensitization to cross-reacting allergens, during immunotherapy with aeroallergens, while other studies ruled out such possibility. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the development of neo-sensitization to Pen a 1 (tropomyosin) as well as the appearance of reactions after ingestion of foods containing tropomyosin as a consequence of sublingual mite immunization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Specific IgE to Tropomyosin (rPen a 1) before and after mite sublingual immunotherapy in 134 subjects were measured. IgE-specific antibodies for mite extract and recombinant allergen Pen a 1 were evaluated using the immunoenzymatic CAP system (Phadia Diagnostics, Milan, Italy). RESULTS: All patients had rPen a 1 IgE negative results before and after mite SLIT and did not show positive shrimp extract skin reactivity and serological rPen a 1 IgE conversion after treatment. More important, no patient showed systemic reactions to crustacean ingestion. CONCLUSIONS: Patients did not show neo-sensitization to tropomyosin, a component of the extract (namely mite group 10) administered. An assessment of a patient's possible pre-existing sensitisation to tropomyosin by skin test and/or specific IgE prior to start mite extract immunotherapy is recommended. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered in EudraCT, with the ID number of 2010-02035531. BioMed Central 2010-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2859740/ /pubmed/20230633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7961-8-4 Text en Copyright ©2010 Rossi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Rossi, Renato E Monasterolo, Giorgio Incorvaia, Cristoforo Moingeon, Philippe Frati, Franco Passalacqua, Giovanni Rossi, Lucilla Canonica, Giorgio W Lack of neo-sensitization to Pen a 1 in patients treated with mite sublingual immunotherapy |
title | Lack of neo-sensitization to Pen a 1 in patients treated with mite sublingual immunotherapy |
title_full | Lack of neo-sensitization to Pen a 1 in patients treated with mite sublingual immunotherapy |
title_fullStr | Lack of neo-sensitization to Pen a 1 in patients treated with mite sublingual immunotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Lack of neo-sensitization to Pen a 1 in patients treated with mite sublingual immunotherapy |
title_short | Lack of neo-sensitization to Pen a 1 in patients treated with mite sublingual immunotherapy |
title_sort | lack of neo-sensitization to pen a 1 in patients treated with mite sublingual immunotherapy |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2859740/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20230633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7961-8-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rossirenatoe lackofneosensitizationtopena1inpatientstreatedwithmitesublingualimmunotherapy AT monasterologiorgio lackofneosensitizationtopena1inpatientstreatedwithmitesublingualimmunotherapy AT incorvaiacristoforo lackofneosensitizationtopena1inpatientstreatedwithmitesublingualimmunotherapy AT moingeonphilippe lackofneosensitizationtopena1inpatientstreatedwithmitesublingualimmunotherapy AT fratifranco lackofneosensitizationtopena1inpatientstreatedwithmitesublingualimmunotherapy AT passalacquagiovanni lackofneosensitizationtopena1inpatientstreatedwithmitesublingualimmunotherapy AT rossilucilla lackofneosensitizationtopena1inpatientstreatedwithmitesublingualimmunotherapy AT canonicagiorgiow lackofneosensitizationtopena1inpatientstreatedwithmitesublingualimmunotherapy |