Cargando…

Time Course of Target Recognition in Visual Search

Visual search is a ubiquitous task of great importance: it allows us to quickly find the objects that we are looking for. During active search for an object (target), eye movements are made to different parts of the scene. Fixation locations are chosen based on a combination of information about the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kotowicz, Andreas, Rutishauser, Ueli, Koch, Christof
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2859879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20428512
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2010.00031
_version_ 1782180546946793472
author Kotowicz, Andreas
Rutishauser, Ueli
Koch, Christof
author_facet Kotowicz, Andreas
Rutishauser, Ueli
Koch, Christof
author_sort Kotowicz, Andreas
collection PubMed
description Visual search is a ubiquitous task of great importance: it allows us to quickly find the objects that we are looking for. During active search for an object (target), eye movements are made to different parts of the scene. Fixation locations are chosen based on a combination of information about the target and the visual input. At the end of a successful search, the eyes typically fixate on the target. But does this imply that target identification occurs while looking at it? The duration of a typical fixation (∼170 ms) and neuronal latencies of both the oculomotor system and the visual stream indicate that there might not be enough time to do so. Previous studies have suggested the following solution to this dilemma: the target is identified extrafoveally and this event will trigger a saccade towards the target location. However this has not been experimentally verified. Here we test the hypothesis that subjects recognize the target before they look at it using a search display of oriented colored bars. Using a gaze-contingent real-time technique, we prematurely stopped search shortly after subjects fixated the target. Afterwards, we asked subjects to identify the target location. We find that subjects can identify the target location even when fixating on the target for less than 10 ms. Longer fixations on the target do not increase detection performance but increase confidence. In contrast, subjects cannot perform this task if they are not allowed to move their eyes. Thus, information about the target during conjunction search for colored oriented bars can, in some circumstances, be acquired at least one fixation ahead of reaching the target. The final fixation serves to increase confidence rather then performance, illustrating a distinct role of the final fixation for the subjective judgment of confidence rather than accuracy.
format Text
id pubmed-2859879
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28598792010-04-27 Time Course of Target Recognition in Visual Search Kotowicz, Andreas Rutishauser, Ueli Koch, Christof Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Visual search is a ubiquitous task of great importance: it allows us to quickly find the objects that we are looking for. During active search for an object (target), eye movements are made to different parts of the scene. Fixation locations are chosen based on a combination of information about the target and the visual input. At the end of a successful search, the eyes typically fixate on the target. But does this imply that target identification occurs while looking at it? The duration of a typical fixation (∼170 ms) and neuronal latencies of both the oculomotor system and the visual stream indicate that there might not be enough time to do so. Previous studies have suggested the following solution to this dilemma: the target is identified extrafoveally and this event will trigger a saccade towards the target location. However this has not been experimentally verified. Here we test the hypothesis that subjects recognize the target before they look at it using a search display of oriented colored bars. Using a gaze-contingent real-time technique, we prematurely stopped search shortly after subjects fixated the target. Afterwards, we asked subjects to identify the target location. We find that subjects can identify the target location even when fixating on the target for less than 10 ms. Longer fixations on the target do not increase detection performance but increase confidence. In contrast, subjects cannot perform this task if they are not allowed to move their eyes. Thus, information about the target during conjunction search for colored oriented bars can, in some circumstances, be acquired at least one fixation ahead of reaching the target. The final fixation serves to increase confidence rather then performance, illustrating a distinct role of the final fixation for the subjective judgment of confidence rather than accuracy. Frontiers Research Foundation 2010-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2859879/ /pubmed/20428512 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2010.00031 Text en Copyright © 2010 Kotowicz, Rutishauser and Koch. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Kotowicz, Andreas
Rutishauser, Ueli
Koch, Christof
Time Course of Target Recognition in Visual Search
title Time Course of Target Recognition in Visual Search
title_full Time Course of Target Recognition in Visual Search
title_fullStr Time Course of Target Recognition in Visual Search
title_full_unstemmed Time Course of Target Recognition in Visual Search
title_short Time Course of Target Recognition in Visual Search
title_sort time course of target recognition in visual search
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2859879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20428512
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2010.00031
work_keys_str_mv AT kotowiczandreas timecourseoftargetrecognitioninvisualsearch
AT rutishauserueli timecourseoftargetrecognitioninvisualsearch
AT kochchristof timecourseoftargetrecognitioninvisualsearch