Cargando…

Diagnostic Accuracy of a Rapid Influenza Test for Pandemic Influenza A H1N1

BACKGROUND: With the current influenza A H1N1 pandemic (H1N1pdm), it is extremely important that clinicians can quickly and accurately identify influenza cases. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: To investigate the performance of the QuickVue Influenza A+B rapid test, we conducted a prospective study o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gordon, Aubree, Videa, Elsa, Saborío, Saira, López, Roger, Kuan, Guillermina, Balmaseda, Angel, Harris, Eva
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2860985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20442773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010364
_version_ 1782180613997985792
author Gordon, Aubree
Videa, Elsa
Saborío, Saira
López, Roger
Kuan, Guillermina
Balmaseda, Angel
Harris, Eva
author_facet Gordon, Aubree
Videa, Elsa
Saborío, Saira
López, Roger
Kuan, Guillermina
Balmaseda, Angel
Harris, Eva
author_sort Gordon, Aubree
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With the current influenza A H1N1 pandemic (H1N1pdm), it is extremely important that clinicians can quickly and accurately identify influenza cases. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: To investigate the performance of the QuickVue Influenza A+B rapid test, we conducted a prospective study of the diagnostic accuracy of the QuickVue Influenza A+B test compared to real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for influenza A H1N1pdm in Nicaraguan children aged 2 to 14 years. Rapid test sensitivity and specificity compared to real-time RT-PCR were 64.1% (95% CI 53.5, 73.9) and 98.3% (95.0, 99.6), respectively. Agreement between the two tests was 86.4% (95% CI 81.7, 90.3), and kappa was calculated to be 0.67 (95% CI 0.56, 0.76). Performance of the rapid test varied by day of presentation, with a sensitivity of 41.7% (95% CI 22.1, 63.4) for samples from children presenting on the day of symptom onset and a sensitivity of 72.1% (95% CI 59.9, 82.3) for samples from children presenting one or more days post-symptom onset. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We found that the rapid test performed with moderate sensitivity and high specificity. Test performance varied by day of onset, with lower sensitivity on the day of symptom onset.
format Text
id pubmed-2860985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28609852010-05-04 Diagnostic Accuracy of a Rapid Influenza Test for Pandemic Influenza A H1N1 Gordon, Aubree Videa, Elsa Saborío, Saira López, Roger Kuan, Guillermina Balmaseda, Angel Harris, Eva PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: With the current influenza A H1N1 pandemic (H1N1pdm), it is extremely important that clinicians can quickly and accurately identify influenza cases. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: To investigate the performance of the QuickVue Influenza A+B rapid test, we conducted a prospective study of the diagnostic accuracy of the QuickVue Influenza A+B test compared to real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for influenza A H1N1pdm in Nicaraguan children aged 2 to 14 years. Rapid test sensitivity and specificity compared to real-time RT-PCR were 64.1% (95% CI 53.5, 73.9) and 98.3% (95.0, 99.6), respectively. Agreement between the two tests was 86.4% (95% CI 81.7, 90.3), and kappa was calculated to be 0.67 (95% CI 0.56, 0.76). Performance of the rapid test varied by day of presentation, with a sensitivity of 41.7% (95% CI 22.1, 63.4) for samples from children presenting on the day of symptom onset and a sensitivity of 72.1% (95% CI 59.9, 82.3) for samples from children presenting one or more days post-symptom onset. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We found that the rapid test performed with moderate sensitivity and high specificity. Test performance varied by day of onset, with lower sensitivity on the day of symptom onset. Public Library of Science 2010-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC2860985/ /pubmed/20442773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010364 Text en Gordon et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gordon, Aubree
Videa, Elsa
Saborío, Saira
López, Roger
Kuan, Guillermina
Balmaseda, Angel
Harris, Eva
Diagnostic Accuracy of a Rapid Influenza Test for Pandemic Influenza A H1N1
title Diagnostic Accuracy of a Rapid Influenza Test for Pandemic Influenza A H1N1
title_full Diagnostic Accuracy of a Rapid Influenza Test for Pandemic Influenza A H1N1
title_fullStr Diagnostic Accuracy of a Rapid Influenza Test for Pandemic Influenza A H1N1
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Accuracy of a Rapid Influenza Test for Pandemic Influenza A H1N1
title_short Diagnostic Accuracy of a Rapid Influenza Test for Pandemic Influenza A H1N1
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of a rapid influenza test for pandemic influenza a h1n1
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2860985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20442773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010364
work_keys_str_mv AT gordonaubree diagnosticaccuracyofarapidinfluenzatestforpandemicinfluenzaah1n1
AT videaelsa diagnosticaccuracyofarapidinfluenzatestforpandemicinfluenzaah1n1
AT saboriosaira diagnosticaccuracyofarapidinfluenzatestforpandemicinfluenzaah1n1
AT lopezroger diagnosticaccuracyofarapidinfluenzatestforpandemicinfluenzaah1n1
AT kuanguillermina diagnosticaccuracyofarapidinfluenzatestforpandemicinfluenzaah1n1
AT balmasedaangel diagnosticaccuracyofarapidinfluenzatestforpandemicinfluenzaah1n1
AT harriseva diagnosticaccuracyofarapidinfluenzatestforpandemicinfluenzaah1n1