Cargando…

Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced SSFP MR angiography compared with conventional contrast-enhanced MR angiography for the assessment of thoracic aortic diseases

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the image quality and diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) unenhanced steady state free precession (SSFP) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for the evaluation of thoracic aortic diseases. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients with know...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krishnam, Mayil S., Tomasian, Anderanik, Malik, Sachin, Desphande, Vibhas, Laub, Gerhard, Ruehm, Stefan G.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2861759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20013276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1672-3
_version_ 1782180671617236992
author Krishnam, Mayil S.
Tomasian, Anderanik
Malik, Sachin
Desphande, Vibhas
Laub, Gerhard
Ruehm, Stefan G.
author_facet Krishnam, Mayil S.
Tomasian, Anderanik
Malik, Sachin
Desphande, Vibhas
Laub, Gerhard
Ruehm, Stefan G.
author_sort Krishnam, Mayil S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the image quality and diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) unenhanced steady state free precession (SSFP) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for the evaluation of thoracic aortic diseases. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients with known or suspected thoracic aortic disease underwent free-breathing ECG-gated unenhanced SSFP MRA with non-selective radiofrequency excitation and contrast-enhanced (CE) MRA of the thorax at 1.5 T. Two readers independently evaluated the two datasets for image quality in the aortic root, ascending aorta, aortic arch, descending aorta, and origins of supra-aortic arteries, and for abnormal findings. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were determined for both datasets. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced SSFP MRA for the diagnosis of aortic abnormalities were determined. RESULTS: Abnormal aortic findings, including aneurysm (n = 47), coarctation (n = 14), dissection (n = 12), aortic graft (n = 6), intramural hematoma (n = 11), mural thrombus in the aortic arch (n = 1), and penetrating aortic ulcer (n = 9), were confidently detected on both datasets. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of SSFP MRA for the detection of aortic disease were 100% with CE-MRA serving as a reference standard. Image quality of the aortic root was significantly higher on SSFP MRA (P < 0.001) with no significant difference for other aortic segments (P > 0.05). SNR and CNR values were higher for all segments on SSFP MRA (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that free-breathing navigator-gated 3D SSFP MRA with non-selective radiofrequency excitation is a promising technique that provides high image quality and diagnostic accuracy for the assessment of thoracic aortic disease without the need for intravenous contrast material.
format Text
id pubmed-2861759
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28617592010-05-10 Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced SSFP MR angiography compared with conventional contrast-enhanced MR angiography for the assessment of thoracic aortic diseases Krishnam, Mayil S. Tomasian, Anderanik Malik, Sachin Desphande, Vibhas Laub, Gerhard Ruehm, Stefan G. Eur Radiol Chest OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the image quality and diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) unenhanced steady state free precession (SSFP) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for the evaluation of thoracic aortic diseases. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients with known or suspected thoracic aortic disease underwent free-breathing ECG-gated unenhanced SSFP MRA with non-selective radiofrequency excitation and contrast-enhanced (CE) MRA of the thorax at 1.5 T. Two readers independently evaluated the two datasets for image quality in the aortic root, ascending aorta, aortic arch, descending aorta, and origins of supra-aortic arteries, and for abnormal findings. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were determined for both datasets. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced SSFP MRA for the diagnosis of aortic abnormalities were determined. RESULTS: Abnormal aortic findings, including aneurysm (n = 47), coarctation (n = 14), dissection (n = 12), aortic graft (n = 6), intramural hematoma (n = 11), mural thrombus in the aortic arch (n = 1), and penetrating aortic ulcer (n = 9), were confidently detected on both datasets. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of SSFP MRA for the detection of aortic disease were 100% with CE-MRA serving as a reference standard. Image quality of the aortic root was significantly higher on SSFP MRA (P < 0.001) with no significant difference for other aortic segments (P > 0.05). SNR and CNR values were higher for all segments on SSFP MRA (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that free-breathing navigator-gated 3D SSFP MRA with non-selective radiofrequency excitation is a promising technique that provides high image quality and diagnostic accuracy for the assessment of thoracic aortic disease without the need for intravenous contrast material. Springer-Verlag 2009-12-16 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2861759/ /pubmed/20013276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1672-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2009 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Chest
Krishnam, Mayil S.
Tomasian, Anderanik
Malik, Sachin
Desphande, Vibhas
Laub, Gerhard
Ruehm, Stefan G.
Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced SSFP MR angiography compared with conventional contrast-enhanced MR angiography for the assessment of thoracic aortic diseases
title Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced SSFP MR angiography compared with conventional contrast-enhanced MR angiography for the assessment of thoracic aortic diseases
title_full Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced SSFP MR angiography compared with conventional contrast-enhanced MR angiography for the assessment of thoracic aortic diseases
title_fullStr Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced SSFP MR angiography compared with conventional contrast-enhanced MR angiography for the assessment of thoracic aortic diseases
title_full_unstemmed Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced SSFP MR angiography compared with conventional contrast-enhanced MR angiography for the assessment of thoracic aortic diseases
title_short Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced SSFP MR angiography compared with conventional contrast-enhanced MR angiography for the assessment of thoracic aortic diseases
title_sort image quality and diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced ssfp mr angiography compared with conventional contrast-enhanced mr angiography for the assessment of thoracic aortic diseases
topic Chest
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2861759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20013276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1672-3
work_keys_str_mv AT krishnammayils imagequalityanddiagnosticaccuracyofunenhancedssfpmrangiographycomparedwithconventionalcontrastenhancedmrangiographyfortheassessmentofthoracicaorticdiseases
AT tomasiananderanik imagequalityanddiagnosticaccuracyofunenhancedssfpmrangiographycomparedwithconventionalcontrastenhancedmrangiographyfortheassessmentofthoracicaorticdiseases
AT maliksachin imagequalityanddiagnosticaccuracyofunenhancedssfpmrangiographycomparedwithconventionalcontrastenhancedmrangiographyfortheassessmentofthoracicaorticdiseases
AT desphandevibhas imagequalityanddiagnosticaccuracyofunenhancedssfpmrangiographycomparedwithconventionalcontrastenhancedmrangiographyfortheassessmentofthoracicaorticdiseases
AT laubgerhard imagequalityanddiagnosticaccuracyofunenhancedssfpmrangiographycomparedwithconventionalcontrastenhancedmrangiographyfortheassessmentofthoracicaorticdiseases
AT ruehmstefang imagequalityanddiagnosticaccuracyofunenhancedssfpmrangiographycomparedwithconventionalcontrastenhancedmrangiographyfortheassessmentofthoracicaorticdiseases