Cargando…

Is monthly retreatment with intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin(®)) necessary in neovascular age-related macular degeneration?

PURPOSE: To report our short-term experience with bevacizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and recommend a new treatment strategy. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of 29 consecutive patients receiving 1.25 mg of intravitreal bevacizumab for AMD and completing 12 weeks of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghazi, Nicola G, Kirk, Tyler Q, Knape, Robert M, Tiedeman, James S, Conway, Brian P
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2861937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20463798
_version_ 1782180683612946432
author Ghazi, Nicola G
Kirk, Tyler Q
Knape, Robert M
Tiedeman, James S
Conway, Brian P
author_facet Ghazi, Nicola G
Kirk, Tyler Q
Knape, Robert M
Tiedeman, James S
Conway, Brian P
author_sort Ghazi, Nicola G
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To report our short-term experience with bevacizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and recommend a new treatment strategy. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of 29 consecutive patients receiving 1.25 mg of intravitreal bevacizumab for AMD and completing 12 weeks of follow up. Outcome measures were best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) central macular thickness. Injections were repeated if no further improvement was observed. RESULTS: Twenty-nine eyes of 29 patients were included. The average BCVA improved from 20/148 at baseline to 20/106 at twelve weeks (P = 0.041). Of the 29 eyes, 25 (86.2%) had stable or improved BCVA. Average mean central macular thickness measured by OCT improved from 351 μm at baseline to 278 μm at 12 weeks (P = 0.003). Stabilization of vision and improved OCT central macular thickness were maintained for at least eight weeks following only a single injection in the majority of eyes. During the three months of follow up, only five eyes (17.2%) required repeat injections, with only three (10.3%) requiring retreatment at eight weeks and none at four weeks. No significant ocular or systemic side effects were observed. CONCLUSION: This short-term data suggests that bevacizumab appears to be a safe and effective treatment for neovascular AMD. Injections as frequent as every month do not appear to be necessary since initial treatment effect appears to be maintained for at least eight weeks in almost all of our patients.
format Text
id pubmed-2861937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28619372010-05-12 Is monthly retreatment with intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin(®)) necessary in neovascular age-related macular degeneration? Ghazi, Nicola G Kirk, Tyler Q Knape, Robert M Tiedeman, James S Conway, Brian P Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To report our short-term experience with bevacizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and recommend a new treatment strategy. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of 29 consecutive patients receiving 1.25 mg of intravitreal bevacizumab for AMD and completing 12 weeks of follow up. Outcome measures were best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) central macular thickness. Injections were repeated if no further improvement was observed. RESULTS: Twenty-nine eyes of 29 patients were included. The average BCVA improved from 20/148 at baseline to 20/106 at twelve weeks (P = 0.041). Of the 29 eyes, 25 (86.2%) had stable or improved BCVA. Average mean central macular thickness measured by OCT improved from 351 μm at baseline to 278 μm at 12 weeks (P = 0.003). Stabilization of vision and improved OCT central macular thickness were maintained for at least eight weeks following only a single injection in the majority of eyes. During the three months of follow up, only five eyes (17.2%) required repeat injections, with only three (10.3%) requiring retreatment at eight weeks and none at four weeks. No significant ocular or systemic side effects were observed. CONCLUSION: This short-term data suggests that bevacizumab appears to be a safe and effective treatment for neovascular AMD. Injections as frequent as every month do not appear to be necessary since initial treatment effect appears to be maintained for at least eight weeks in almost all of our patients. Dove Medical Press 2010 2010-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2861937/ /pubmed/20463798 Text en © 2010 Ghazi et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ghazi, Nicola G
Kirk, Tyler Q
Knape, Robert M
Tiedeman, James S
Conway, Brian P
Is monthly retreatment with intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin(®)) necessary in neovascular age-related macular degeneration?
title Is monthly retreatment with intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin(®)) necessary in neovascular age-related macular degeneration?
title_full Is monthly retreatment with intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin(®)) necessary in neovascular age-related macular degeneration?
title_fullStr Is monthly retreatment with intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin(®)) necessary in neovascular age-related macular degeneration?
title_full_unstemmed Is monthly retreatment with intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin(®)) necessary in neovascular age-related macular degeneration?
title_short Is monthly retreatment with intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin(®)) necessary in neovascular age-related macular degeneration?
title_sort is monthly retreatment with intravitreal bevacizumab (avastin(®)) necessary in neovascular age-related macular degeneration?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2861937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20463798
work_keys_str_mv AT ghazinicolag ismonthlyretreatmentwithintravitrealbevacizumabavastinnecessaryinneovascularagerelatedmaculardegeneration
AT kirktylerq ismonthlyretreatmentwithintravitrealbevacizumabavastinnecessaryinneovascularagerelatedmaculardegeneration
AT knaperobertm ismonthlyretreatmentwithintravitrealbevacizumabavastinnecessaryinneovascularagerelatedmaculardegeneration
AT tiedemanjamess ismonthlyretreatmentwithintravitrealbevacizumabavastinnecessaryinneovascularagerelatedmaculardegeneration
AT conwaybrianp ismonthlyretreatmentwithintravitrealbevacizumabavastinnecessaryinneovascularagerelatedmaculardegeneration