Cargando…

Insensitivity of visual assessment of hippocampal atrophy in familial Alzheimer’s disease

Medial temporal atrophy is a well-established marker for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, due to normal variation in the size of medial temporal structures and variability in how radiologists interpret images, the use of clinical reads in establishing the presence of pathological atrophy is imprec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ringman, John Matthew, Pope, Whitney, Salamon, Noriko
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2864895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20047059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-009-5436-4
_version_ 1782180806969524224
author Ringman, John Matthew
Pope, Whitney
Salamon, Noriko
author_facet Ringman, John Matthew
Pope, Whitney
Salamon, Noriko
author_sort Ringman, John Matthew
collection PubMed
description Medial temporal atrophy is a well-established marker for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, due to normal variation in the size of medial temporal structures and variability in how radiologists interpret images, the use of clinical reads in establishing the presence of pathological atrophy is imprecise. A limitation of studies of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures in AD is diagnostic uncertainty as it can be unknown if pre- or early-symptomatic subjects go on to develop AD and most subjects do not undergo autopsy verification of the diagnosis. In persons with or at-risk for AD due to fully-penetrant autosomal dominant mutations in the PSEN1 and APP genes, the diagnosis or future development of AD can be predicted with essentially 100% accuracy. We used this predictability to assess the ability of radiologists to detect hippocampal atrophy (HA) in persons destined to develop AD. Coronal T1-weighted MRI scans of 39 persons demented from (n = 4) or at-risk for inheriting (n = 35) PSEN1 or APP mutations were independently assessed by two radiologists and the presence or absence of HA determined. Of the 39 subjects, 26 were FAD mutation carriers. Fifteen of 28 asymptomatic at-risk persons were FAD mutation carriers and four of these were rated as having atrophy for a sensitivity of 27% and a specificity of 85%. Among seven mildly affected yet non-demented subjects, atrophy was detected in three and in the four demented subjects HA was identified in two. Our results suggest that radiologists’ ability to detect HA in persons in whom the diagnosis of incipient AD is certain is sub-optimal and quantitative MRI techniques or other biological markers of the disease are needed.
format Text
id pubmed-2864895
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28648952010-05-10 Insensitivity of visual assessment of hippocampal atrophy in familial Alzheimer’s disease Ringman, John Matthew Pope, Whitney Salamon, Noriko J Neurol Original Communication Medial temporal atrophy is a well-established marker for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, due to normal variation in the size of medial temporal structures and variability in how radiologists interpret images, the use of clinical reads in establishing the presence of pathological atrophy is imprecise. A limitation of studies of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures in AD is diagnostic uncertainty as it can be unknown if pre- or early-symptomatic subjects go on to develop AD and most subjects do not undergo autopsy verification of the diagnosis. In persons with or at-risk for AD due to fully-penetrant autosomal dominant mutations in the PSEN1 and APP genes, the diagnosis or future development of AD can be predicted with essentially 100% accuracy. We used this predictability to assess the ability of radiologists to detect hippocampal atrophy (HA) in persons destined to develop AD. Coronal T1-weighted MRI scans of 39 persons demented from (n = 4) or at-risk for inheriting (n = 35) PSEN1 or APP mutations were independently assessed by two radiologists and the presence or absence of HA determined. Of the 39 subjects, 26 were FAD mutation carriers. Fifteen of 28 asymptomatic at-risk persons were FAD mutation carriers and four of these were rated as having atrophy for a sensitivity of 27% and a specificity of 85%. Among seven mildly affected yet non-demented subjects, atrophy was detected in three and in the four demented subjects HA was identified in two. Our results suggest that radiologists’ ability to detect HA in persons in whom the diagnosis of incipient AD is certain is sub-optimal and quantitative MRI techniques or other biological markers of the disease are needed. Springer-Verlag 2010-01-03 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2864895/ /pubmed/20047059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-009-5436-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Communication
Ringman, John Matthew
Pope, Whitney
Salamon, Noriko
Insensitivity of visual assessment of hippocampal atrophy in familial Alzheimer’s disease
title Insensitivity of visual assessment of hippocampal atrophy in familial Alzheimer’s disease
title_full Insensitivity of visual assessment of hippocampal atrophy in familial Alzheimer’s disease
title_fullStr Insensitivity of visual assessment of hippocampal atrophy in familial Alzheimer’s disease
title_full_unstemmed Insensitivity of visual assessment of hippocampal atrophy in familial Alzheimer’s disease
title_short Insensitivity of visual assessment of hippocampal atrophy in familial Alzheimer’s disease
title_sort insensitivity of visual assessment of hippocampal atrophy in familial alzheimer’s disease
topic Original Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2864895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20047059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-009-5436-4
work_keys_str_mv AT ringmanjohnmatthew insensitivityofvisualassessmentofhippocampalatrophyinfamilialalzheimersdisease
AT popewhitney insensitivityofvisualassessmentofhippocampalatrophyinfamilialalzheimersdisease
AT salamonnoriko insensitivityofvisualassessmentofhippocampalatrophyinfamilialalzheimersdisease