Cargando…

Tolerability and Patient/Physician Satisfaction with Subcutaneously Administered Methotrexate Provided in Two Formulations of Different Drug Concentrations in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

OBJECTIVES: To determine preference, satisfaction, usability and local tolerability by patients, physicians and study nurses of two subcutaneously administered methotrexate (MTX) formulations of different concentrations. METHODS: This was an open-label, comparative, within-patient controlled, multic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Müller-Ladner, Ulf, Rockwitz, Karin, Brandt-Jürgens, Jan, Haux, Roland, Kästner, Peter, Braun, Jürgen, Demary, Winfried, Guimbal-Schmolck, Cécile, Pichlmeier, Uwe, Brandt, Andreas
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2866241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20461222
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874312901004010015
_version_ 1782180884799029248
author Müller-Ladner, Ulf
Rockwitz, Karin
Brandt-Jürgens, Jan
Haux, Roland
Kästner, Peter
Braun, Jürgen
Demary, Winfried
Guimbal-Schmolck, Cécile
Pichlmeier, Uwe
Brandt, Andreas
author_facet Müller-Ladner, Ulf
Rockwitz, Karin
Brandt-Jürgens, Jan
Haux, Roland
Kästner, Peter
Braun, Jürgen
Demary, Winfried
Guimbal-Schmolck, Cécile
Pichlmeier, Uwe
Brandt, Andreas
author_sort Müller-Ladner, Ulf
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To determine preference, satisfaction, usability and local tolerability by patients, physicians and study nurses of two subcutaneously administered methotrexate (MTX) formulations of different concentrations. METHODS: This was an open-label, comparative, within-patient controlled, multicentre study of 132 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). MTX treatment consisted of 20 mg/week administered as a medium-concentration formulation (MC) (2.0 ml of 10 mg/ml solution in prefilled syringe; separate needle) compared to a novel high-concentration formulation (HC) (0.4 ml of 50 mg/ml in prefilled syringe; pre-attached needle). Each treatment was given for three weeks. Questionnaires and visual analogue scales were used to measure outcomes. RESULTS: At the end of the study, 93% of the patients preferred HC over MC as further treatment. Overall assessment of HC was “good” or “very good” in 90.6% vs 34.4% in MC-treated patients. Physician’s and patients global assessment of syringe usability showed highly statistically significant differences (P < 0.0001) in favour of HC. Overall assessment by study nurses’ and investigators’ was “good” (18.8%) or “very good” (81.2%) for HC and “good” in 31.3% or “very good” in 12.5% for MC, and no preference in 50%. Local tolerability improved slightly also with HC. CONCLUSIONS: The total smaller volume of administered drug and the improved usability of a pre-attached needle in combination with a smaller prefilled syringe resulted in preference of the patients of HC over MC. The slightly improved local tolerability may also have added to this preference. This assessment was confirmed by similar assessments made by healthcare professionals. Eudra-CT number: 2007-003591-19.
format Text
id pubmed-2866241
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Bentham Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28662412010-05-11 Tolerability and Patient/Physician Satisfaction with Subcutaneously Administered Methotrexate Provided in Two Formulations of Different Drug Concentrations in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Müller-Ladner, Ulf Rockwitz, Karin Brandt-Jürgens, Jan Haux, Roland Kästner, Peter Braun, Jürgen Demary, Winfried Guimbal-Schmolck, Cécile Pichlmeier, Uwe Brandt, Andreas Open Rheumatol J Article OBJECTIVES: To determine preference, satisfaction, usability and local tolerability by patients, physicians and study nurses of two subcutaneously administered methotrexate (MTX) formulations of different concentrations. METHODS: This was an open-label, comparative, within-patient controlled, multicentre study of 132 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). MTX treatment consisted of 20 mg/week administered as a medium-concentration formulation (MC) (2.0 ml of 10 mg/ml solution in prefilled syringe; separate needle) compared to a novel high-concentration formulation (HC) (0.4 ml of 50 mg/ml in prefilled syringe; pre-attached needle). Each treatment was given for three weeks. Questionnaires and visual analogue scales were used to measure outcomes. RESULTS: At the end of the study, 93% of the patients preferred HC over MC as further treatment. Overall assessment of HC was “good” or “very good” in 90.6% vs 34.4% in MC-treated patients. Physician’s and patients global assessment of syringe usability showed highly statistically significant differences (P < 0.0001) in favour of HC. Overall assessment by study nurses’ and investigators’ was “good” (18.8%) or “very good” (81.2%) for HC and “good” in 31.3% or “very good” in 12.5% for MC, and no preference in 50%. Local tolerability improved slightly also with HC. CONCLUSIONS: The total smaller volume of administered drug and the improved usability of a pre-attached needle in combination with a smaller prefilled syringe resulted in preference of the patients of HC over MC. The slightly improved local tolerability may also have added to this preference. This assessment was confirmed by similar assessments made by healthcare professionals. Eudra-CT number: 2007-003591-19. Bentham Open 2010-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2866241/ /pubmed/20461222 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874312901004010015 Text en © Müller-Ladner et al.; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Müller-Ladner, Ulf
Rockwitz, Karin
Brandt-Jürgens, Jan
Haux, Roland
Kästner, Peter
Braun, Jürgen
Demary, Winfried
Guimbal-Schmolck, Cécile
Pichlmeier, Uwe
Brandt, Andreas
Tolerability and Patient/Physician Satisfaction with Subcutaneously Administered Methotrexate Provided in Two Formulations of Different Drug Concentrations in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
title Tolerability and Patient/Physician Satisfaction with Subcutaneously Administered Methotrexate Provided in Two Formulations of Different Drug Concentrations in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_full Tolerability and Patient/Physician Satisfaction with Subcutaneously Administered Methotrexate Provided in Two Formulations of Different Drug Concentrations in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_fullStr Tolerability and Patient/Physician Satisfaction with Subcutaneously Administered Methotrexate Provided in Two Formulations of Different Drug Concentrations in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_full_unstemmed Tolerability and Patient/Physician Satisfaction with Subcutaneously Administered Methotrexate Provided in Two Formulations of Different Drug Concentrations in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_short Tolerability and Patient/Physician Satisfaction with Subcutaneously Administered Methotrexate Provided in Two Formulations of Different Drug Concentrations in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_sort tolerability and patient/physician satisfaction with subcutaneously administered methotrexate provided in two formulations of different drug concentrations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2866241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20461222
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874312901004010015
work_keys_str_mv AT mullerladnerulf tolerabilityandpatientphysiciansatisfactionwithsubcutaneouslyadministeredmethotrexateprovidedintwoformulationsofdifferentdrugconcentrationsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT rockwitzkarin tolerabilityandpatientphysiciansatisfactionwithsubcutaneouslyadministeredmethotrexateprovidedintwoformulationsofdifferentdrugconcentrationsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT brandtjurgensjan tolerabilityandpatientphysiciansatisfactionwithsubcutaneouslyadministeredmethotrexateprovidedintwoformulationsofdifferentdrugconcentrationsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT hauxroland tolerabilityandpatientphysiciansatisfactionwithsubcutaneouslyadministeredmethotrexateprovidedintwoformulationsofdifferentdrugconcentrationsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT kastnerpeter tolerabilityandpatientphysiciansatisfactionwithsubcutaneouslyadministeredmethotrexateprovidedintwoformulationsofdifferentdrugconcentrationsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT braunjurgen tolerabilityandpatientphysiciansatisfactionwithsubcutaneouslyadministeredmethotrexateprovidedintwoformulationsofdifferentdrugconcentrationsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT demarywinfried tolerabilityandpatientphysiciansatisfactionwithsubcutaneouslyadministeredmethotrexateprovidedintwoformulationsofdifferentdrugconcentrationsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT guimbalschmolckcecile tolerabilityandpatientphysiciansatisfactionwithsubcutaneouslyadministeredmethotrexateprovidedintwoformulationsofdifferentdrugconcentrationsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT pichlmeieruwe tolerabilityandpatientphysiciansatisfactionwithsubcutaneouslyadministeredmethotrexateprovidedintwoformulationsofdifferentdrugconcentrationsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT brandtandreas tolerabilityandpatientphysiciansatisfactionwithsubcutaneouslyadministeredmethotrexateprovidedintwoformulationsofdifferentdrugconcentrationsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT tolerabilityandpatientphysiciansatisfactionwithsubcutaneouslyadministeredmethotrexateprovidedintwoformulationsofdifferentdrugconcentrationsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis