Cargando…
Tolerability and Patient/Physician Satisfaction with Subcutaneously Administered Methotrexate Provided in Two Formulations of Different Drug Concentrations in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
OBJECTIVES: To determine preference, satisfaction, usability and local tolerability by patients, physicians and study nurses of two subcutaneously administered methotrexate (MTX) formulations of different concentrations. METHODS: This was an open-label, comparative, within-patient controlled, multic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bentham Open
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2866241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20461222 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874312901004010015 |
_version_ | 1782180884799029248 |
---|---|
author | Müller-Ladner, Ulf Rockwitz, Karin Brandt-Jürgens, Jan Haux, Roland Kästner, Peter Braun, Jürgen Demary, Winfried Guimbal-Schmolck, Cécile Pichlmeier, Uwe Brandt, Andreas |
author_facet | Müller-Ladner, Ulf Rockwitz, Karin Brandt-Jürgens, Jan Haux, Roland Kästner, Peter Braun, Jürgen Demary, Winfried Guimbal-Schmolck, Cécile Pichlmeier, Uwe Brandt, Andreas |
author_sort | Müller-Ladner, Ulf |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To determine preference, satisfaction, usability and local tolerability by patients, physicians and study nurses of two subcutaneously administered methotrexate (MTX) formulations of different concentrations. METHODS: This was an open-label, comparative, within-patient controlled, multicentre study of 132 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). MTX treatment consisted of 20 mg/week administered as a medium-concentration formulation (MC) (2.0 ml of 10 mg/ml solution in prefilled syringe; separate needle) compared to a novel high-concentration formulation (HC) (0.4 ml of 50 mg/ml in prefilled syringe; pre-attached needle). Each treatment was given for three weeks. Questionnaires and visual analogue scales were used to measure outcomes. RESULTS: At the end of the study, 93% of the patients preferred HC over MC as further treatment. Overall assessment of HC was “good” or “very good” in 90.6% vs 34.4% in MC-treated patients. Physician’s and patients global assessment of syringe usability showed highly statistically significant differences (P < 0.0001) in favour of HC. Overall assessment by study nurses’ and investigators’ was “good” (18.8%) or “very good” (81.2%) for HC and “good” in 31.3% or “very good” in 12.5% for MC, and no preference in 50%. Local tolerability improved slightly also with HC. CONCLUSIONS: The total smaller volume of administered drug and the improved usability of a pre-attached needle in combination with a smaller prefilled syringe resulted in preference of the patients of HC over MC. The slightly improved local tolerability may also have added to this preference. This assessment was confirmed by similar assessments made by healthcare professionals. Eudra-CT number: 2007-003591-19. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2866241 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Bentham Open |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28662412010-05-11 Tolerability and Patient/Physician Satisfaction with Subcutaneously Administered Methotrexate Provided in Two Formulations of Different Drug Concentrations in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Müller-Ladner, Ulf Rockwitz, Karin Brandt-Jürgens, Jan Haux, Roland Kästner, Peter Braun, Jürgen Demary, Winfried Guimbal-Schmolck, Cécile Pichlmeier, Uwe Brandt, Andreas Open Rheumatol J Article OBJECTIVES: To determine preference, satisfaction, usability and local tolerability by patients, physicians and study nurses of two subcutaneously administered methotrexate (MTX) formulations of different concentrations. METHODS: This was an open-label, comparative, within-patient controlled, multicentre study of 132 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). MTX treatment consisted of 20 mg/week administered as a medium-concentration formulation (MC) (2.0 ml of 10 mg/ml solution in prefilled syringe; separate needle) compared to a novel high-concentration formulation (HC) (0.4 ml of 50 mg/ml in prefilled syringe; pre-attached needle). Each treatment was given for three weeks. Questionnaires and visual analogue scales were used to measure outcomes. RESULTS: At the end of the study, 93% of the patients preferred HC over MC as further treatment. Overall assessment of HC was “good” or “very good” in 90.6% vs 34.4% in MC-treated patients. Physician’s and patients global assessment of syringe usability showed highly statistically significant differences (P < 0.0001) in favour of HC. Overall assessment by study nurses’ and investigators’ was “good” (18.8%) or “very good” (81.2%) for HC and “good” in 31.3% or “very good” in 12.5% for MC, and no preference in 50%. Local tolerability improved slightly also with HC. CONCLUSIONS: The total smaller volume of administered drug and the improved usability of a pre-attached needle in combination with a smaller prefilled syringe resulted in preference of the patients of HC over MC. The slightly improved local tolerability may also have added to this preference. This assessment was confirmed by similar assessments made by healthcare professionals. Eudra-CT number: 2007-003591-19. Bentham Open 2010-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2866241/ /pubmed/20461222 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874312901004010015 Text en © Müller-Ladner et al.; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Müller-Ladner, Ulf Rockwitz, Karin Brandt-Jürgens, Jan Haux, Roland Kästner, Peter Braun, Jürgen Demary, Winfried Guimbal-Schmolck, Cécile Pichlmeier, Uwe Brandt, Andreas Tolerability and Patient/Physician Satisfaction with Subcutaneously Administered Methotrexate Provided in Two Formulations of Different Drug Concentrations in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis |
title | Tolerability and Patient/Physician Satisfaction with Subcutaneously Administered Methotrexate Provided in Two Formulations of Different Drug Concentrations in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis |
title_full | Tolerability and Patient/Physician Satisfaction with Subcutaneously Administered Methotrexate Provided in Two Formulations of Different Drug Concentrations in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis |
title_fullStr | Tolerability and Patient/Physician Satisfaction with Subcutaneously Administered Methotrexate Provided in Two Formulations of Different Drug Concentrations in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis |
title_full_unstemmed | Tolerability and Patient/Physician Satisfaction with Subcutaneously Administered Methotrexate Provided in Two Formulations of Different Drug Concentrations in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis |
title_short | Tolerability and Patient/Physician Satisfaction with Subcutaneously Administered Methotrexate Provided in Two Formulations of Different Drug Concentrations in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis |
title_sort | tolerability and patient/physician satisfaction with subcutaneously administered methotrexate provided in two formulations of different drug concentrations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2866241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20461222 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874312901004010015 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mullerladnerulf tolerabilityandpatientphysiciansatisfactionwithsubcutaneouslyadministeredmethotrexateprovidedintwoformulationsofdifferentdrugconcentrationsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT rockwitzkarin tolerabilityandpatientphysiciansatisfactionwithsubcutaneouslyadministeredmethotrexateprovidedintwoformulationsofdifferentdrugconcentrationsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT brandtjurgensjan tolerabilityandpatientphysiciansatisfactionwithsubcutaneouslyadministeredmethotrexateprovidedintwoformulationsofdifferentdrugconcentrationsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT hauxroland tolerabilityandpatientphysiciansatisfactionwithsubcutaneouslyadministeredmethotrexateprovidedintwoformulationsofdifferentdrugconcentrationsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT kastnerpeter tolerabilityandpatientphysiciansatisfactionwithsubcutaneouslyadministeredmethotrexateprovidedintwoformulationsofdifferentdrugconcentrationsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT braunjurgen tolerabilityandpatientphysiciansatisfactionwithsubcutaneouslyadministeredmethotrexateprovidedintwoformulationsofdifferentdrugconcentrationsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT demarywinfried tolerabilityandpatientphysiciansatisfactionwithsubcutaneouslyadministeredmethotrexateprovidedintwoformulationsofdifferentdrugconcentrationsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT guimbalschmolckcecile tolerabilityandpatientphysiciansatisfactionwithsubcutaneouslyadministeredmethotrexateprovidedintwoformulationsofdifferentdrugconcentrationsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT pichlmeieruwe tolerabilityandpatientphysiciansatisfactionwithsubcutaneouslyadministeredmethotrexateprovidedintwoformulationsofdifferentdrugconcentrationsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT brandtandreas tolerabilityandpatientphysiciansatisfactionwithsubcutaneouslyadministeredmethotrexateprovidedintwoformulationsofdifferentdrugconcentrationsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT tolerabilityandpatientphysiciansatisfactionwithsubcutaneouslyadministeredmethotrexateprovidedintwoformulationsofdifferentdrugconcentrationsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis |