Cargando…

A Single-Institution Review of Portosystemic Shunts in Children: An Ongoing Discussion

Purpose. Review the safety and long-term success with portosystemic shunts in children at a single institution. Methods. An IRB-approved, retrospective chart review of all children ages 19 and undergoing surgical portosystemic shunt from January 1990–September 2008. Results. Ten patients were identi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lillegard, J. B., Hanna, A. M., McKenzie, T. J., Moir, C. R., Ishitani, M. B., Nagorney, D. M.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2866242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20467465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/964597
_version_ 1782180885039153152
author Lillegard, J. B.
Hanna, A. M.
McKenzie, T. J.
Moir, C. R.
Ishitani, M. B.
Nagorney, D. M.
author_facet Lillegard, J. B.
Hanna, A. M.
McKenzie, T. J.
Moir, C. R.
Ishitani, M. B.
Nagorney, D. M.
author_sort Lillegard, J. B.
collection PubMed
description Purpose. Review the safety and long-term success with portosystemic shunts in children at a single institution. Methods. An IRB-approved, retrospective chart review of all children ages 19 and undergoing surgical portosystemic shunt from January 1990–September 2008. Results. Ten patients were identified, 8 females and 2 males, with a mean age of 15 years (range 5–19 years). Primary diagnoses were congenital hepatic fibrosis (5), hepatic vein thrombosis (2), portal vein thrombosis (2), and cystic fibrosis (1). Primary indications were repeated variceal bleeding (6), symptomatic hypersplenism (2), and significant liver dysfunction (2). Procedures performed were distal splenorenal bypass (4), side-to-side portocaval shunt (3), proximal splenorenal shunt (2), and an interposition H-graft portocaval shunt (1). There was no perioperative mortality and only minor morbidity. Seventy percent of patients had improvement of their symptoms. Eighty percent of shunts remained patent. Two were occluded at a median follow-up of 50 months (range 0.5–13.16 years). Two patients underwent subsequent liver transplantation. Two patients died at 0.5 and 12.8 years postoperatively, one from multisystem failure with cystic fibrosis and one from post-operative transplant complications. Conclusions. The need for portosystemic shunts in children is rare. However, in the era of liver transplantation, portosystemic shunts in selected patients with well-preserved liver function remains important. We conclude that portosystemic shunts are safe and efficacious in the control of variceal hemorrhage and symptoms related to hypersplenism.
format Text
id pubmed-2866242
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28662422010-05-13 A Single-Institution Review of Portosystemic Shunts in Children: An Ongoing Discussion Lillegard, J. B. Hanna, A. M. McKenzie, T. J. Moir, C. R. Ishitani, M. B. Nagorney, D. M. HPB Surg Clinical Study Purpose. Review the safety and long-term success with portosystemic shunts in children at a single institution. Methods. An IRB-approved, retrospective chart review of all children ages 19 and undergoing surgical portosystemic shunt from January 1990–September 2008. Results. Ten patients were identified, 8 females and 2 males, with a mean age of 15 years (range 5–19 years). Primary diagnoses were congenital hepatic fibrosis (5), hepatic vein thrombosis (2), portal vein thrombosis (2), and cystic fibrosis (1). Primary indications were repeated variceal bleeding (6), symptomatic hypersplenism (2), and significant liver dysfunction (2). Procedures performed were distal splenorenal bypass (4), side-to-side portocaval shunt (3), proximal splenorenal shunt (2), and an interposition H-graft portocaval shunt (1). There was no perioperative mortality and only minor morbidity. Seventy percent of patients had improvement of their symptoms. Eighty percent of shunts remained patent. Two were occluded at a median follow-up of 50 months (range 0.5–13.16 years). Two patients underwent subsequent liver transplantation. Two patients died at 0.5 and 12.8 years postoperatively, one from multisystem failure with cystic fibrosis and one from post-operative transplant complications. Conclusions. The need for portosystemic shunts in children is rare. However, in the era of liver transplantation, portosystemic shunts in selected patients with well-preserved liver function remains important. We conclude that portosystemic shunts are safe and efficacious in the control of variceal hemorrhage and symptoms related to hypersplenism. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2010 2010-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2866242/ /pubmed/20467465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/964597 Text en Copyright © 2010 J. B. Lillegard et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Lillegard, J. B.
Hanna, A. M.
McKenzie, T. J.
Moir, C. R.
Ishitani, M. B.
Nagorney, D. M.
A Single-Institution Review of Portosystemic Shunts in Children: An Ongoing Discussion
title A Single-Institution Review of Portosystemic Shunts in Children: An Ongoing Discussion
title_full A Single-Institution Review of Portosystemic Shunts in Children: An Ongoing Discussion
title_fullStr A Single-Institution Review of Portosystemic Shunts in Children: An Ongoing Discussion
title_full_unstemmed A Single-Institution Review of Portosystemic Shunts in Children: An Ongoing Discussion
title_short A Single-Institution Review of Portosystemic Shunts in Children: An Ongoing Discussion
title_sort single-institution review of portosystemic shunts in children: an ongoing discussion
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2866242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20467465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/964597
work_keys_str_mv AT lillegardjb asingleinstitutionreviewofportosystemicshuntsinchildrenanongoingdiscussion
AT hannaam asingleinstitutionreviewofportosystemicshuntsinchildrenanongoingdiscussion
AT mckenzietj asingleinstitutionreviewofportosystemicshuntsinchildrenanongoingdiscussion
AT moircr asingleinstitutionreviewofportosystemicshuntsinchildrenanongoingdiscussion
AT ishitanimb asingleinstitutionreviewofportosystemicshuntsinchildrenanongoingdiscussion
AT nagorneydm asingleinstitutionreviewofportosystemicshuntsinchildrenanongoingdiscussion
AT lillegardjb singleinstitutionreviewofportosystemicshuntsinchildrenanongoingdiscussion
AT hannaam singleinstitutionreviewofportosystemicshuntsinchildrenanongoingdiscussion
AT mckenzietj singleinstitutionreviewofportosystemicshuntsinchildrenanongoingdiscussion
AT moircr singleinstitutionreviewofportosystemicshuntsinchildrenanongoingdiscussion
AT ishitanimb singleinstitutionreviewofportosystemicshuntsinchildrenanongoingdiscussion
AT nagorneydm singleinstitutionreviewofportosystemicshuntsinchildrenanongoingdiscussion