Cargando…

Neural Competition for Conscious Representation across Time: An fMRI Study

BACKGROUND: The information processing capacity of the human mind is limited, as is evidenced by the attentional blink (AB) - a deficit in identifying the second of two temporally-close targets (T1 and T2) embedded in a rapid stream of distracters. Theories of the AB generally agree that it results...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slagter, Heleen A., Johnstone, Tom, Beets, Iseult A. M., Davidson, Richard J.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2866664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20479939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010556
_version_ 1782180935998898176
author Slagter, Heleen A.
Johnstone, Tom
Beets, Iseult A. M.
Davidson, Richard J.
author_facet Slagter, Heleen A.
Johnstone, Tom
Beets, Iseult A. M.
Davidson, Richard J.
author_sort Slagter, Heleen A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The information processing capacity of the human mind is limited, as is evidenced by the attentional blink (AB) - a deficit in identifying the second of two temporally-close targets (T1 and T2) embedded in a rapid stream of distracters. Theories of the AB generally agree that it results from competition between stimuli for conscious representation. However, they disagree in the specific mechanisms, in particular about how attentional processing of T1 determines the AB to T2. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The present study used the high spatial resolution of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine the neural mechanisms underlying the AB. Our research approach was to design T1 and T2 stimuli that activate distinguishable brain areas involved in visual categorization and representation. ROI and functional connectivity analyses were then used to examine how attentional processing of T1, as indexed by activity in the T1 representation area, affected T2 processing. Our main finding was that attentional processing of T1 at the level of the visual cortex predicted T2 detection rates Those individuals who activated the T1 encoding area more strongly in blink versus no-blink trials generally detected T2 on a lower percentage of trials. The coupling of activity between T1 and T2 representation areas did not vary as a function of conscious T2 perception. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These data are consistent with the notion that the AB is related to attentional demands of T1 for selection, and indicate that these demands are reflected at the level of visual cortex. They also highlight the importance of individual differences in attentional settings in explaining AB task performance.
format Text
id pubmed-2866664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28666642010-05-17 Neural Competition for Conscious Representation across Time: An fMRI Study Slagter, Heleen A. Johnstone, Tom Beets, Iseult A. M. Davidson, Richard J. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The information processing capacity of the human mind is limited, as is evidenced by the attentional blink (AB) - a deficit in identifying the second of two temporally-close targets (T1 and T2) embedded in a rapid stream of distracters. Theories of the AB generally agree that it results from competition between stimuli for conscious representation. However, they disagree in the specific mechanisms, in particular about how attentional processing of T1 determines the AB to T2. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The present study used the high spatial resolution of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine the neural mechanisms underlying the AB. Our research approach was to design T1 and T2 stimuli that activate distinguishable brain areas involved in visual categorization and representation. ROI and functional connectivity analyses were then used to examine how attentional processing of T1, as indexed by activity in the T1 representation area, affected T2 processing. Our main finding was that attentional processing of T1 at the level of the visual cortex predicted T2 detection rates Those individuals who activated the T1 encoding area more strongly in blink versus no-blink trials generally detected T2 on a lower percentage of trials. The coupling of activity between T1 and T2 representation areas did not vary as a function of conscious T2 perception. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These data are consistent with the notion that the AB is related to attentional demands of T1 for selection, and indicate that these demands are reflected at the level of visual cortex. They also highlight the importance of individual differences in attentional settings in explaining AB task performance. Public Library of Science 2010-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2866664/ /pubmed/20479939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010556 Text en Slagter et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Slagter, Heleen A.
Johnstone, Tom
Beets, Iseult A. M.
Davidson, Richard J.
Neural Competition for Conscious Representation across Time: An fMRI Study
title Neural Competition for Conscious Representation across Time: An fMRI Study
title_full Neural Competition for Conscious Representation across Time: An fMRI Study
title_fullStr Neural Competition for Conscious Representation across Time: An fMRI Study
title_full_unstemmed Neural Competition for Conscious Representation across Time: An fMRI Study
title_short Neural Competition for Conscious Representation across Time: An fMRI Study
title_sort neural competition for conscious representation across time: an fmri study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2866664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20479939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010556
work_keys_str_mv AT slagterheleena neuralcompetitionforconsciousrepresentationacrosstimeanfmristudy
AT johnstonetom neuralcompetitionforconsciousrepresentationacrosstimeanfmristudy
AT beetsiseultam neuralcompetitionforconsciousrepresentationacrosstimeanfmristudy
AT davidsonrichardj neuralcompetitionforconsciousrepresentationacrosstimeanfmristudy