Cargando…

Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography for the detection of in-stent restenosis: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: We sought to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) compared with invasive coronary angiography for in-stent restenosis (ISR) detection. METHODS: MEDLINE, Cochrane library, and BioMed Central database searches were performed until April...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carrabba, Nazario, Schuijf, Joanne D., de Graaf, Fleur R., Parodi, Guido, Maffei, Erica, Valenti, Renato, Palumbo, Alessandro, Weustink, Annick C., Mollet, Nico R., Accetta, Gabriele, Cademartiri, Filippo, Antoniucci, David, Bax, Jeroen J.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2866963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20379863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-010-9218-2
_version_ 1782180951030235136
author Carrabba, Nazario
Schuijf, Joanne D.
de Graaf, Fleur R.
Parodi, Guido
Maffei, Erica
Valenti, Renato
Palumbo, Alessandro
Weustink, Annick C.
Mollet, Nico R.
Accetta, Gabriele
Cademartiri, Filippo
Antoniucci, David
Bax, Jeroen J.
author_facet Carrabba, Nazario
Schuijf, Joanne D.
de Graaf, Fleur R.
Parodi, Guido
Maffei, Erica
Valenti, Renato
Palumbo, Alessandro
Weustink, Annick C.
Mollet, Nico R.
Accetta, Gabriele
Cademartiri, Filippo
Antoniucci, David
Bax, Jeroen J.
author_sort Carrabba, Nazario
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We sought to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) compared with invasive coronary angiography for in-stent restenosis (ISR) detection. METHODS: MEDLINE, Cochrane library, and BioMed Central database searches were performed until April 2009 for original articles. Inclusion criteria were (1) 64-MDCT was used as a diagnostic test for ISR, with >50% diameter stenosis selected as the cut-off criterion for significant ISR, using invasive coronary angiography and quantitative coronary angiography as the standard of reference; (2) absolute numbers of true positive, false positive, true negative, and false negative results could be derived. Standard meta-analytic methods were applied. RESULTS: Nine studies with a total of 598 patients with 978 stents included were considered eligible. On average, 9% of stents were unassessable (range 0-42%). Accuracy tests with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing 64-MDCT vs invasive coronary angiography showed that pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio (random effect model) values were: 86% (95% CI 80-91%), 93% (95% CI 91-95%), 12.32 (95% CI 7.26-20.92), 0.18 (95% CI 0.12-0.28) for binary ISR detection. The symmetric area under the curve value was 0.94, indicating good agreement between 64-MDCT and invasive coronary angiography. CONCLUSIONS: 64-MDCT has a good diagnostic accuracy for ISR detection with a particularly high negative predictive value. However, still a relatively large proportion of stents remains uninterpretable. Accordingly, only in selected patients, 64-MDCT may serve as a potential alternative noninvasive method to rule out ISR.
format Text
id pubmed-2866963
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28669632010-05-24 Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography for the detection of in-stent restenosis: A meta-analysis Carrabba, Nazario Schuijf, Joanne D. de Graaf, Fleur R. Parodi, Guido Maffei, Erica Valenti, Renato Palumbo, Alessandro Weustink, Annick C. Mollet, Nico R. Accetta, Gabriele Cademartiri, Filippo Antoniucci, David Bax, Jeroen J. J Nucl Cardiol Original Article BACKGROUND: We sought to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) compared with invasive coronary angiography for in-stent restenosis (ISR) detection. METHODS: MEDLINE, Cochrane library, and BioMed Central database searches were performed until April 2009 for original articles. Inclusion criteria were (1) 64-MDCT was used as a diagnostic test for ISR, with >50% diameter stenosis selected as the cut-off criterion for significant ISR, using invasive coronary angiography and quantitative coronary angiography as the standard of reference; (2) absolute numbers of true positive, false positive, true negative, and false negative results could be derived. Standard meta-analytic methods were applied. RESULTS: Nine studies with a total of 598 patients with 978 stents included were considered eligible. On average, 9% of stents were unassessable (range 0-42%). Accuracy tests with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing 64-MDCT vs invasive coronary angiography showed that pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio (random effect model) values were: 86% (95% CI 80-91%), 93% (95% CI 91-95%), 12.32 (95% CI 7.26-20.92), 0.18 (95% CI 0.12-0.28) for binary ISR detection. The symmetric area under the curve value was 0.94, indicating good agreement between 64-MDCT and invasive coronary angiography. CONCLUSIONS: 64-MDCT has a good diagnostic accuracy for ISR detection with a particularly high negative predictive value. However, still a relatively large proportion of stents remains uninterpretable. Accordingly, only in selected patients, 64-MDCT may serve as a potential alternative noninvasive method to rule out ISR. Springer-Verlag 2010-04-09 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2866963/ /pubmed/20379863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-010-9218-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Carrabba, Nazario
Schuijf, Joanne D.
de Graaf, Fleur R.
Parodi, Guido
Maffei, Erica
Valenti, Renato
Palumbo, Alessandro
Weustink, Annick C.
Mollet, Nico R.
Accetta, Gabriele
Cademartiri, Filippo
Antoniucci, David
Bax, Jeroen J.
Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography for the detection of in-stent restenosis: A meta-analysis
title Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography for the detection of in-stent restenosis: A meta-analysis
title_full Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography for the detection of in-stent restenosis: A meta-analysis
title_fullStr Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography for the detection of in-stent restenosis: A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography for the detection of in-stent restenosis: A meta-analysis
title_short Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography for the detection of in-stent restenosis: A meta-analysis
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography for the detection of in-stent restenosis: a meta-analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2866963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20379863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-010-9218-2
work_keys_str_mv AT carrabbanazario diagnosticaccuracyof64slicecomputedtomographycoronaryangiographyforthedetectionofinstentrestenosisametaanalysis
AT schuijfjoanned diagnosticaccuracyof64slicecomputedtomographycoronaryangiographyforthedetectionofinstentrestenosisametaanalysis
AT degraaffleurr diagnosticaccuracyof64slicecomputedtomographycoronaryangiographyforthedetectionofinstentrestenosisametaanalysis
AT parodiguido diagnosticaccuracyof64slicecomputedtomographycoronaryangiographyforthedetectionofinstentrestenosisametaanalysis
AT maffeierica diagnosticaccuracyof64slicecomputedtomographycoronaryangiographyforthedetectionofinstentrestenosisametaanalysis
AT valentirenato diagnosticaccuracyof64slicecomputedtomographycoronaryangiographyforthedetectionofinstentrestenosisametaanalysis
AT palumboalessandro diagnosticaccuracyof64slicecomputedtomographycoronaryangiographyforthedetectionofinstentrestenosisametaanalysis
AT weustinkannickc diagnosticaccuracyof64slicecomputedtomographycoronaryangiographyforthedetectionofinstentrestenosisametaanalysis
AT molletnicor diagnosticaccuracyof64slicecomputedtomographycoronaryangiographyforthedetectionofinstentrestenosisametaanalysis
AT accettagabriele diagnosticaccuracyof64slicecomputedtomographycoronaryangiographyforthedetectionofinstentrestenosisametaanalysis
AT cademartirifilippo diagnosticaccuracyof64slicecomputedtomographycoronaryangiographyforthedetectionofinstentrestenosisametaanalysis
AT antoniuccidavid diagnosticaccuracyof64slicecomputedtomographycoronaryangiographyforthedetectionofinstentrestenosisametaanalysis
AT baxjeroenj diagnosticaccuracyof64slicecomputedtomographycoronaryangiographyforthedetectionofinstentrestenosisametaanalysis