Cargando…

Contributions of lean mass and fat mass to bone mineral density: a study in postmenopausal women

BACKGROUND: The relative contribution of lean and fat to the determination of bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women is a contentious issue. The present study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that lean mass is a better determinant of BMD than fat mass. METHODS: This cross-sectional...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ho-Pham, Lan T, Nguyen, Nguyen D, Lai, Thai Q, Nguyen, Tuan V
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2867833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20346165
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-59
_version_ 1782181005728153600
author Ho-Pham, Lan T
Nguyen, Nguyen D
Lai, Thai Q
Nguyen, Tuan V
author_facet Ho-Pham, Lan T
Nguyen, Nguyen D
Lai, Thai Q
Nguyen, Tuan V
author_sort Ho-Pham, Lan T
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The relative contribution of lean and fat to the determination of bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women is a contentious issue. The present study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that lean mass is a better determinant of BMD than fat mass. METHODS: This cross-sectional study involved 210 postmenopausal women of Vietnamese background, aged between 50 and 85 years, who were randomly sampled from various districts in Ho Chi Minh City (Vietnam). Whole body scans, femoral neck, and lumbar spine BMD were measured by DXA (QDR 4500, Hologic Inc., Waltham, MA). Lean mass (LM) and fat mass (FM) were derived from the whole body scan. Furthermore, lean mass index (LMi) and fat mass index (FMi) were calculated as ratio of LM or FM to body height in metre squared (m(2)). RESULTS: In multiple linear regression analysis, both LM and FM were independent and significant predictors of BMD at the spine and femoral neck. Age, lean mass and fat mass collectively explained 33% variance of lumbar spine and 38% variance of femoral neck BMD. Replacing LM and FM by LMi and LMi did not alter the result. In both analyses, the influence of LM or LMi was greater than FM and FMi. Simulation analysis suggested that a study with 1000 individuals has a 78% chance of finding the significant effects of both LM and FM, and a 22% chance of finding LM alone significant, and zero chance of finding the effect of fat mass alone. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that both lean mass and fat mass are important determinants of BMD. For a given body size -- measured either by lean mass or height --women with greater fat mass have greater BMD.
format Text
id pubmed-2867833
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28678332010-05-12 Contributions of lean mass and fat mass to bone mineral density: a study in postmenopausal women Ho-Pham, Lan T Nguyen, Nguyen D Lai, Thai Q Nguyen, Tuan V BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research article BACKGROUND: The relative contribution of lean and fat to the determination of bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women is a contentious issue. The present study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that lean mass is a better determinant of BMD than fat mass. METHODS: This cross-sectional study involved 210 postmenopausal women of Vietnamese background, aged between 50 and 85 years, who were randomly sampled from various districts in Ho Chi Minh City (Vietnam). Whole body scans, femoral neck, and lumbar spine BMD were measured by DXA (QDR 4500, Hologic Inc., Waltham, MA). Lean mass (LM) and fat mass (FM) were derived from the whole body scan. Furthermore, lean mass index (LMi) and fat mass index (FMi) were calculated as ratio of LM or FM to body height in metre squared (m(2)). RESULTS: In multiple linear regression analysis, both LM and FM were independent and significant predictors of BMD at the spine and femoral neck. Age, lean mass and fat mass collectively explained 33% variance of lumbar spine and 38% variance of femoral neck BMD. Replacing LM and FM by LMi and LMi did not alter the result. In both analyses, the influence of LM or LMi was greater than FM and FMi. Simulation analysis suggested that a study with 1000 individuals has a 78% chance of finding the significant effects of both LM and FM, and a 22% chance of finding LM alone significant, and zero chance of finding the effect of fat mass alone. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that both lean mass and fat mass are important determinants of BMD. For a given body size -- measured either by lean mass or height --women with greater fat mass have greater BMD. BioMed Central 2010-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2867833/ /pubmed/20346165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-59 Text en Copyright ©2010 Ho-Pham et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research article
Ho-Pham, Lan T
Nguyen, Nguyen D
Lai, Thai Q
Nguyen, Tuan V
Contributions of lean mass and fat mass to bone mineral density: a study in postmenopausal women
title Contributions of lean mass and fat mass to bone mineral density: a study in postmenopausal women
title_full Contributions of lean mass and fat mass to bone mineral density: a study in postmenopausal women
title_fullStr Contributions of lean mass and fat mass to bone mineral density: a study in postmenopausal women
title_full_unstemmed Contributions of lean mass and fat mass to bone mineral density: a study in postmenopausal women
title_short Contributions of lean mass and fat mass to bone mineral density: a study in postmenopausal women
title_sort contributions of lean mass and fat mass to bone mineral density: a study in postmenopausal women
topic Research article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2867833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20346165
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-59
work_keys_str_mv AT hophamlant contributionsofleanmassandfatmasstobonemineraldensityastudyinpostmenopausalwomen
AT nguyennguyend contributionsofleanmassandfatmasstobonemineraldensityastudyinpostmenopausalwomen
AT laithaiq contributionsofleanmassandfatmasstobonemineraldensityastudyinpostmenopausalwomen
AT nguyentuanv contributionsofleanmassandfatmasstobonemineraldensityastudyinpostmenopausalwomen