Cargando…
A randomized trial to evaluate e-learning interventions designed to improve learner's performance, satisfaction, and self-efficacy with the AGREE II
BACKGROUND: Practice guidelines (PGs) are systematically developed statements intended to assist in patient, practitioner, and policy decisions. The AGREE II is the revised and updated standard tool for guideline development, reporting and evaluation. It is comprised of 23 items and a user's Ma...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2868048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20403188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-29 |
_version_ | 1782181035140710400 |
---|---|
author | Brouwers, Melissa C Makarski, Julie Levinson, Anthony J |
author_facet | Brouwers, Melissa C Makarski, Julie Levinson, Anthony J |
author_sort | Brouwers, Melissa C |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Practice guidelines (PGs) are systematically developed statements intended to assist in patient, practitioner, and policy decisions. The AGREE II is the revised and updated standard tool for guideline development, reporting and evaluation. It is comprised of 23 items and a user's Manual. The AGREE II is ready for use. OBJECTIVES: To develop, execute, and evaluate the impact of two internet-based educational interventions designed to accelerate the capacity of stakeholders to use the AGREE II: a multimedia didactic tutorial with a virtual coach, and a higher intensity training program including both the didactic tutorial and an interactive practice exercise component. METHODS: Participants (clinicians, developers, and policy makers) will be randomly assigned to one of three conditions. Condition one, didactic tutorial -- participants will go through the on-line AGREE II tutorial supported by a virtual coach and review of the AGREE II prior to appraising the test PG. Condition two, tutorial + practice -- following the multimedia didactic tutorial with a virtual coach, participants will review the on-line AGREE II independently and use it to appraise a practice PG. Upon entering their AGREE II score for the practice PG, participants will be given immediate feedback on how their score compares to expert norms. If their score falls outside a predefined range, the participant will receive a series of hints to guide the appraisal process. Participants will receive an overall summary of their performance appraising the PG compared to expert norms. Condition three, control arm -- participants will receive a PDF copy of the AGREE II for review and to appraise the test PG on-line. All participants will then rate one of ten test PGs with the AGREE II. The outcomes of interest are learners' performance, satisfaction, self-efficacy, mental effort, and time-on-task; comparisons will be made across each of the test groups. DISCUSSION: Our research will test innovative educational interventions of various intensities and instructional design to promote the adoption of AGREE II and to identify those strategies that are most effective for training. The results will facilitate international capacity to apply the AGREE II accurately and with confidence and to enhance the overall guideline enterprise. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2868048 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28680482010-05-12 A randomized trial to evaluate e-learning interventions designed to improve learner's performance, satisfaction, and self-efficacy with the AGREE II Brouwers, Melissa C Makarski, Julie Levinson, Anthony J Implement Sci Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Practice guidelines (PGs) are systematically developed statements intended to assist in patient, practitioner, and policy decisions. The AGREE II is the revised and updated standard tool for guideline development, reporting and evaluation. It is comprised of 23 items and a user's Manual. The AGREE II is ready for use. OBJECTIVES: To develop, execute, and evaluate the impact of two internet-based educational interventions designed to accelerate the capacity of stakeholders to use the AGREE II: a multimedia didactic tutorial with a virtual coach, and a higher intensity training program including both the didactic tutorial and an interactive practice exercise component. METHODS: Participants (clinicians, developers, and policy makers) will be randomly assigned to one of three conditions. Condition one, didactic tutorial -- participants will go through the on-line AGREE II tutorial supported by a virtual coach and review of the AGREE II prior to appraising the test PG. Condition two, tutorial + practice -- following the multimedia didactic tutorial with a virtual coach, participants will review the on-line AGREE II independently and use it to appraise a practice PG. Upon entering their AGREE II score for the practice PG, participants will be given immediate feedback on how their score compares to expert norms. If their score falls outside a predefined range, the participant will receive a series of hints to guide the appraisal process. Participants will receive an overall summary of their performance appraising the PG compared to expert norms. Condition three, control arm -- participants will receive a PDF copy of the AGREE II for review and to appraise the test PG on-line. All participants will then rate one of ten test PGs with the AGREE II. The outcomes of interest are learners' performance, satisfaction, self-efficacy, mental effort, and time-on-task; comparisons will be made across each of the test groups. DISCUSSION: Our research will test innovative educational interventions of various intensities and instructional design to promote the adoption of AGREE II and to identify those strategies that are most effective for training. The results will facilitate international capacity to apply the AGREE II accurately and with confidence and to enhance the overall guideline enterprise. BioMed Central 2010-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC2868048/ /pubmed/20403188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-29 Text en Copyright ©2010 Brouwers et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Brouwers, Melissa C Makarski, Julie Levinson, Anthony J A randomized trial to evaluate e-learning interventions designed to improve learner's performance, satisfaction, and self-efficacy with the AGREE II |
title | A randomized trial to evaluate e-learning interventions designed to improve learner's performance, satisfaction, and self-efficacy with the AGREE II |
title_full | A randomized trial to evaluate e-learning interventions designed to improve learner's performance, satisfaction, and self-efficacy with the AGREE II |
title_fullStr | A randomized trial to evaluate e-learning interventions designed to improve learner's performance, satisfaction, and self-efficacy with the AGREE II |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomized trial to evaluate e-learning interventions designed to improve learner's performance, satisfaction, and self-efficacy with the AGREE II |
title_short | A randomized trial to evaluate e-learning interventions designed to improve learner's performance, satisfaction, and self-efficacy with the AGREE II |
title_sort | randomized trial to evaluate e-learning interventions designed to improve learner's performance, satisfaction, and self-efficacy with the agree ii |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2868048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20403188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-29 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brouwersmelissac arandomizedtrialtoevaluateelearninginterventionsdesignedtoimprovelearnersperformancesatisfactionandselfefficacywiththeagreeii AT makarskijulie arandomizedtrialtoevaluateelearninginterventionsdesignedtoimprovelearnersperformancesatisfactionandselfefficacywiththeagreeii AT levinsonanthonyj arandomizedtrialtoevaluateelearninginterventionsdesignedtoimprovelearnersperformancesatisfactionandselfefficacywiththeagreeii AT brouwersmelissac randomizedtrialtoevaluateelearninginterventionsdesignedtoimprovelearnersperformancesatisfactionandselfefficacywiththeagreeii AT makarskijulie randomizedtrialtoevaluateelearninginterventionsdesignedtoimprovelearnersperformancesatisfactionandselfefficacywiththeagreeii AT levinsonanthonyj randomizedtrialtoevaluateelearninginterventionsdesignedtoimprovelearnersperformancesatisfactionandselfefficacywiththeagreeii |