Cargando…

Assisting informed decision making for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for labour analgesia versus a pamphlet

BACKGROUND: Most women use some method of pain relief during labour. There is extensive research evidence available of pharmacological pain relief during labour; however this evidence is not readily available to pregnant women. Decision aids are tools that present evidence based information and allo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raynes-Greenow, Camille H, Nassar, Natasha, Torvaldsen, Siranda, Trevena, Lyndal, Roberts, Christine L
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2868791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20377844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-10-15
_version_ 1782181062175096832
author Raynes-Greenow, Camille H
Nassar, Natasha
Torvaldsen, Siranda
Trevena, Lyndal
Roberts, Christine L
author_facet Raynes-Greenow, Camille H
Nassar, Natasha
Torvaldsen, Siranda
Trevena, Lyndal
Roberts, Christine L
author_sort Raynes-Greenow, Camille H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most women use some method of pain relief during labour. There is extensive research evidence available of pharmacological pain relief during labour; however this evidence is not readily available to pregnant women. Decision aids are tools that present evidence based information and allow preference elicitation. METHODS: We developed a labour analgesia decision aid. Using a RCT design women either received a decision aid or a pamphlet. Eligible women were primiparous, ≥ 37 weeks, planning a vaginal birth of a single infant and had sufficient English to complete the trial materials. We used a combination of affective (anxiety, satisfaction and participation in decision-making) and behavioural outcomes (intention and analgesia use) to assess the impact of the decision aid, which were assessed before labour. RESULTS: 596 women were randomised (395 decision aid group, 201 pamphlet group). There were significant differences in knowledge scores between the decision aid group and the pamphlet group (mean difference 8.6, 95% CI 3.70, 13.40). There were no differences between decisional conflict scores (mean difference -0.99 (95% CI -3.07, 1.07), or anxiety (mean difference 0.3, 95% CI -2.15, 1.50). The decision aid group were significantly more likely to consider their care providers opinion (RR 1.28 95%CI 0.64, 0.95). There were no differences in analgesia use and poor follow through between antenatal analgesia intentions and use. CONCLUSIONS: This decision aid improves women's labour analgesia knowledge without increasing anxiety. Significantly, the decision aid group were more informed of labour analgesia options, and considered the opinion of their care providers more often when making their analgesia decisions, thus improving informed decision making. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration no: ISRCTN52287533
format Text
id pubmed-2868791
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28687912010-05-13 Assisting informed decision making for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for labour analgesia versus a pamphlet Raynes-Greenow, Camille H Nassar, Natasha Torvaldsen, Siranda Trevena, Lyndal Roberts, Christine L BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research article BACKGROUND: Most women use some method of pain relief during labour. There is extensive research evidence available of pharmacological pain relief during labour; however this evidence is not readily available to pregnant women. Decision aids are tools that present evidence based information and allow preference elicitation. METHODS: We developed a labour analgesia decision aid. Using a RCT design women either received a decision aid or a pamphlet. Eligible women were primiparous, ≥ 37 weeks, planning a vaginal birth of a single infant and had sufficient English to complete the trial materials. We used a combination of affective (anxiety, satisfaction and participation in decision-making) and behavioural outcomes (intention and analgesia use) to assess the impact of the decision aid, which were assessed before labour. RESULTS: 596 women were randomised (395 decision aid group, 201 pamphlet group). There were significant differences in knowledge scores between the decision aid group and the pamphlet group (mean difference 8.6, 95% CI 3.70, 13.40). There were no differences between decisional conflict scores (mean difference -0.99 (95% CI -3.07, 1.07), or anxiety (mean difference 0.3, 95% CI -2.15, 1.50). The decision aid group were significantly more likely to consider their care providers opinion (RR 1.28 95%CI 0.64, 0.95). There were no differences in analgesia use and poor follow through between antenatal analgesia intentions and use. CONCLUSIONS: This decision aid improves women's labour analgesia knowledge without increasing anxiety. Significantly, the decision aid group were more informed of labour analgesia options, and considered the opinion of their care providers more often when making their analgesia decisions, thus improving informed decision making. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration no: ISRCTN52287533 BioMed Central 2010-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC2868791/ /pubmed/20377844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-10-15 Text en Copyright ©2010 Raynes-Greenow et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research article
Raynes-Greenow, Camille H
Nassar, Natasha
Torvaldsen, Siranda
Trevena, Lyndal
Roberts, Christine L
Assisting informed decision making for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for labour analgesia versus a pamphlet
title Assisting informed decision making for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for labour analgesia versus a pamphlet
title_full Assisting informed decision making for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for labour analgesia versus a pamphlet
title_fullStr Assisting informed decision making for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for labour analgesia versus a pamphlet
title_full_unstemmed Assisting informed decision making for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for labour analgesia versus a pamphlet
title_short Assisting informed decision making for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for labour analgesia versus a pamphlet
title_sort assisting informed decision making for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for labour analgesia versus a pamphlet
topic Research article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2868791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20377844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-10-15
work_keys_str_mv AT raynesgreenowcamilleh assistinginformeddecisionmakingforlabouranalgesiaarandomisedcontrolledtrialofadecisionaidforlabouranalgesiaversusapamphlet
AT nassarnatasha assistinginformeddecisionmakingforlabouranalgesiaarandomisedcontrolledtrialofadecisionaidforlabouranalgesiaversusapamphlet
AT torvaldsensiranda assistinginformeddecisionmakingforlabouranalgesiaarandomisedcontrolledtrialofadecisionaidforlabouranalgesiaversusapamphlet
AT trevenalyndal assistinginformeddecisionmakingforlabouranalgesiaarandomisedcontrolledtrialofadecisionaidforlabouranalgesiaversusapamphlet
AT robertschristinel assistinginformeddecisionmakingforlabouranalgesiaarandomisedcontrolledtrialofadecisionaidforlabouranalgesiaversusapamphlet