Cargando…
Assisting informed decision making for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for labour analgesia versus a pamphlet
BACKGROUND: Most women use some method of pain relief during labour. There is extensive research evidence available of pharmacological pain relief during labour; however this evidence is not readily available to pregnant women. Decision aids are tools that present evidence based information and allo...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2868791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20377844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-10-15 |
_version_ | 1782181062175096832 |
---|---|
author | Raynes-Greenow, Camille H Nassar, Natasha Torvaldsen, Siranda Trevena, Lyndal Roberts, Christine L |
author_facet | Raynes-Greenow, Camille H Nassar, Natasha Torvaldsen, Siranda Trevena, Lyndal Roberts, Christine L |
author_sort | Raynes-Greenow, Camille H |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Most women use some method of pain relief during labour. There is extensive research evidence available of pharmacological pain relief during labour; however this evidence is not readily available to pregnant women. Decision aids are tools that present evidence based information and allow preference elicitation. METHODS: We developed a labour analgesia decision aid. Using a RCT design women either received a decision aid or a pamphlet. Eligible women were primiparous, ≥ 37 weeks, planning a vaginal birth of a single infant and had sufficient English to complete the trial materials. We used a combination of affective (anxiety, satisfaction and participation in decision-making) and behavioural outcomes (intention and analgesia use) to assess the impact of the decision aid, which were assessed before labour. RESULTS: 596 women were randomised (395 decision aid group, 201 pamphlet group). There were significant differences in knowledge scores between the decision aid group and the pamphlet group (mean difference 8.6, 95% CI 3.70, 13.40). There were no differences between decisional conflict scores (mean difference -0.99 (95% CI -3.07, 1.07), or anxiety (mean difference 0.3, 95% CI -2.15, 1.50). The decision aid group were significantly more likely to consider their care providers opinion (RR 1.28 95%CI 0.64, 0.95). There were no differences in analgesia use and poor follow through between antenatal analgesia intentions and use. CONCLUSIONS: This decision aid improves women's labour analgesia knowledge without increasing anxiety. Significantly, the decision aid group were more informed of labour analgesia options, and considered the opinion of their care providers more often when making their analgesia decisions, thus improving informed decision making. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration no: ISRCTN52287533 |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2868791 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28687912010-05-13 Assisting informed decision making for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for labour analgesia versus a pamphlet Raynes-Greenow, Camille H Nassar, Natasha Torvaldsen, Siranda Trevena, Lyndal Roberts, Christine L BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research article BACKGROUND: Most women use some method of pain relief during labour. There is extensive research evidence available of pharmacological pain relief during labour; however this evidence is not readily available to pregnant women. Decision aids are tools that present evidence based information and allow preference elicitation. METHODS: We developed a labour analgesia decision aid. Using a RCT design women either received a decision aid or a pamphlet. Eligible women were primiparous, ≥ 37 weeks, planning a vaginal birth of a single infant and had sufficient English to complete the trial materials. We used a combination of affective (anxiety, satisfaction and participation in decision-making) and behavioural outcomes (intention and analgesia use) to assess the impact of the decision aid, which were assessed before labour. RESULTS: 596 women were randomised (395 decision aid group, 201 pamphlet group). There were significant differences in knowledge scores between the decision aid group and the pamphlet group (mean difference 8.6, 95% CI 3.70, 13.40). There were no differences between decisional conflict scores (mean difference -0.99 (95% CI -3.07, 1.07), or anxiety (mean difference 0.3, 95% CI -2.15, 1.50). The decision aid group were significantly more likely to consider their care providers opinion (RR 1.28 95%CI 0.64, 0.95). There were no differences in analgesia use and poor follow through between antenatal analgesia intentions and use. CONCLUSIONS: This decision aid improves women's labour analgesia knowledge without increasing anxiety. Significantly, the decision aid group were more informed of labour analgesia options, and considered the opinion of their care providers more often when making their analgesia decisions, thus improving informed decision making. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration no: ISRCTN52287533 BioMed Central 2010-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC2868791/ /pubmed/20377844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-10-15 Text en Copyright ©2010 Raynes-Greenow et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research article Raynes-Greenow, Camille H Nassar, Natasha Torvaldsen, Siranda Trevena, Lyndal Roberts, Christine L Assisting informed decision making for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for labour analgesia versus a pamphlet |
title | Assisting informed decision making for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for labour analgesia versus a pamphlet |
title_full | Assisting informed decision making for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for labour analgesia versus a pamphlet |
title_fullStr | Assisting informed decision making for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for labour analgesia versus a pamphlet |
title_full_unstemmed | Assisting informed decision making for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for labour analgesia versus a pamphlet |
title_short | Assisting informed decision making for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for labour analgesia versus a pamphlet |
title_sort | assisting informed decision making for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for labour analgesia versus a pamphlet |
topic | Research article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2868791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20377844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-10-15 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raynesgreenowcamilleh assistinginformeddecisionmakingforlabouranalgesiaarandomisedcontrolledtrialofadecisionaidforlabouranalgesiaversusapamphlet AT nassarnatasha assistinginformeddecisionmakingforlabouranalgesiaarandomisedcontrolledtrialofadecisionaidforlabouranalgesiaversusapamphlet AT torvaldsensiranda assistinginformeddecisionmakingforlabouranalgesiaarandomisedcontrolledtrialofadecisionaidforlabouranalgesiaversusapamphlet AT trevenalyndal assistinginformeddecisionmakingforlabouranalgesiaarandomisedcontrolledtrialofadecisionaidforlabouranalgesiaversusapamphlet AT robertschristinel assistinginformeddecisionmakingforlabouranalgesiaarandomisedcontrolledtrialofadecisionaidforlabouranalgesiaversusapamphlet |