Cargando…

The use of muscle strength assessed with handheld dynamometers as a non-invasive biological marker in myotonic dystrophy type 1 patients: a multicenter study

BACKGROUND: Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is a multisystem disorder that demonstrates variable symptoms and rates of progression. Muscle weakness is considered one of the main problems with a clinical picture that is characterized by distal weakness of the limbs progressing to proximal weakness. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hébert, Luc J, Remec, Jean-François, Saulnier, Joanne, Vial, Christophe, Puymirat, Jack
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2868792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20398425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-72
_version_ 1782181062422560768
author Hébert, Luc J
Remec, Jean-François
Saulnier, Joanne
Vial, Christophe
Puymirat, Jack
author_facet Hébert, Luc J
Remec, Jean-François
Saulnier, Joanne
Vial, Christophe
Puymirat, Jack
author_sort Hébert, Luc J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is a multisystem disorder that demonstrates variable symptoms and rates of progression. Muscle weakness is considered one of the main problems with a clinical picture that is characterized by distal weakness of the limbs progressing to proximal weakness. The main objective of this study was to characterize the maximal strength of ankle eversion and dorsiflexion in DM1 patients. Manual and handheld dynamometer (HHD) muscle testing were also compared. METHODS: The maximal strength of 22 patients from Quebec (mean age = 41,1 ± 13,8) and 24 from Lyon (mean age = 41,6 ± 10,2) were compared to 16 matched controls. RESULTS: With the use of HHD, an excellent reproducibility of the torque measurements was obtained for both centers in eversion (R(2 )= 0,94/Quebec; 0,89/Lyon) and dorsiflexion (R(2 )= 0,96/Quebec; 0,90/Lyon). The differences between 3 groups of DM1 (mild, moderate, severe) and between them and controls were all statistically significant (p < 0,001). No statistical differences between sites were observed (p > 0.05). The degree of muscle strength decline in dorsiflexion (eversion) were 60% (47%), 77% (71%), and 87% (83%) for DM1 with mild, moderate, and severe impairments, respectively. The smallest mean difference between all DM1 patients taking together was 2.3 Nm, a difference about twice than the standard error of measurement. There was a strong relationship between eversion and dorsiflexion strength profiles (R(2 )= 0,87;Quebec/0,80;Lyon). Using a 10-point scale, manual muscle testing could not discriminate between the 3 groups of DM1 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The HHD protocol showed discriminative properties suitable for multicentre therapeutic trial. The present results confirmed the capacity of quantitative muscle testing to discriminate between healthy and DM1 patients with different levels of impairments. This study is a preliminary step for the implementation of a valid, reliable and responsive clinical outcome for the measurement of muscle impairments with this population.
format Text
id pubmed-2868792
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28687922010-05-13 The use of muscle strength assessed with handheld dynamometers as a non-invasive biological marker in myotonic dystrophy type 1 patients: a multicenter study Hébert, Luc J Remec, Jean-François Saulnier, Joanne Vial, Christophe Puymirat, Jack BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research article BACKGROUND: Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is a multisystem disorder that demonstrates variable symptoms and rates of progression. Muscle weakness is considered one of the main problems with a clinical picture that is characterized by distal weakness of the limbs progressing to proximal weakness. The main objective of this study was to characterize the maximal strength of ankle eversion and dorsiflexion in DM1 patients. Manual and handheld dynamometer (HHD) muscle testing were also compared. METHODS: The maximal strength of 22 patients from Quebec (mean age = 41,1 ± 13,8) and 24 from Lyon (mean age = 41,6 ± 10,2) were compared to 16 matched controls. RESULTS: With the use of HHD, an excellent reproducibility of the torque measurements was obtained for both centers in eversion (R(2 )= 0,94/Quebec; 0,89/Lyon) and dorsiflexion (R(2 )= 0,96/Quebec; 0,90/Lyon). The differences between 3 groups of DM1 (mild, moderate, severe) and between them and controls were all statistically significant (p < 0,001). No statistical differences between sites were observed (p > 0.05). The degree of muscle strength decline in dorsiflexion (eversion) were 60% (47%), 77% (71%), and 87% (83%) for DM1 with mild, moderate, and severe impairments, respectively. The smallest mean difference between all DM1 patients taking together was 2.3 Nm, a difference about twice than the standard error of measurement. There was a strong relationship between eversion and dorsiflexion strength profiles (R(2 )= 0,87;Quebec/0,80;Lyon). Using a 10-point scale, manual muscle testing could not discriminate between the 3 groups of DM1 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The HHD protocol showed discriminative properties suitable for multicentre therapeutic trial. The present results confirmed the capacity of quantitative muscle testing to discriminate between healthy and DM1 patients with different levels of impairments. This study is a preliminary step for the implementation of a valid, reliable and responsive clinical outcome for the measurement of muscle impairments with this population. BioMed Central 2010-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2868792/ /pubmed/20398425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-72 Text en Copyright ©2010 Hébert et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research article
Hébert, Luc J
Remec, Jean-François
Saulnier, Joanne
Vial, Christophe
Puymirat, Jack
The use of muscle strength assessed with handheld dynamometers as a non-invasive biological marker in myotonic dystrophy type 1 patients: a multicenter study
title The use of muscle strength assessed with handheld dynamometers as a non-invasive biological marker in myotonic dystrophy type 1 patients: a multicenter study
title_full The use of muscle strength assessed with handheld dynamometers as a non-invasive biological marker in myotonic dystrophy type 1 patients: a multicenter study
title_fullStr The use of muscle strength assessed with handheld dynamometers as a non-invasive biological marker in myotonic dystrophy type 1 patients: a multicenter study
title_full_unstemmed The use of muscle strength assessed with handheld dynamometers as a non-invasive biological marker in myotonic dystrophy type 1 patients: a multicenter study
title_short The use of muscle strength assessed with handheld dynamometers as a non-invasive biological marker in myotonic dystrophy type 1 patients: a multicenter study
title_sort use of muscle strength assessed with handheld dynamometers as a non-invasive biological marker in myotonic dystrophy type 1 patients: a multicenter study
topic Research article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2868792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20398425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-72
work_keys_str_mv AT hebertlucj theuseofmusclestrengthassessedwithhandhelddynamometersasanoninvasivebiologicalmarkerinmyotonicdystrophytype1patientsamulticenterstudy
AT remecjeanfrancois theuseofmusclestrengthassessedwithhandhelddynamometersasanoninvasivebiologicalmarkerinmyotonicdystrophytype1patientsamulticenterstudy
AT saulnierjoanne theuseofmusclestrengthassessedwithhandhelddynamometersasanoninvasivebiologicalmarkerinmyotonicdystrophytype1patientsamulticenterstudy
AT vialchristophe theuseofmusclestrengthassessedwithhandhelddynamometersasanoninvasivebiologicalmarkerinmyotonicdystrophytype1patientsamulticenterstudy
AT puymiratjack theuseofmusclestrengthassessedwithhandhelddynamometersasanoninvasivebiologicalmarkerinmyotonicdystrophytype1patientsamulticenterstudy
AT hebertlucj useofmusclestrengthassessedwithhandhelddynamometersasanoninvasivebiologicalmarkerinmyotonicdystrophytype1patientsamulticenterstudy
AT remecjeanfrancois useofmusclestrengthassessedwithhandhelddynamometersasanoninvasivebiologicalmarkerinmyotonicdystrophytype1patientsamulticenterstudy
AT saulnierjoanne useofmusclestrengthassessedwithhandhelddynamometersasanoninvasivebiologicalmarkerinmyotonicdystrophytype1patientsamulticenterstudy
AT vialchristophe useofmusclestrengthassessedwithhandhelddynamometersasanoninvasivebiologicalmarkerinmyotonicdystrophytype1patientsamulticenterstudy
AT puymiratjack useofmusclestrengthassessedwithhandhelddynamometersasanoninvasivebiologicalmarkerinmyotonicdystrophytype1patientsamulticenterstudy