Cargando…
The psychometric properties of three self-report screening instruments for identifying frail older people in the community
BACKGROUND: Frailty is highly prevalent in older people. Its serious adverse consequences, such as disability, are considered to be a public health problem. Therefore, disability prevention in community-dwelling frail older people is considered to be a priority for research and clinical practice in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2868816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20353611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-176 |
_version_ | 1782181068163514368 |
---|---|
author | Metzelthin, Silke F Daniëls, Ramon van Rossum, Erik de Witte, Luc van den Heuvel, Wim JA Kempen, Gertrudis IJM |
author_facet | Metzelthin, Silke F Daniëls, Ramon van Rossum, Erik de Witte, Luc van den Heuvel, Wim JA Kempen, Gertrudis IJM |
author_sort | Metzelthin, Silke F |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Frailty is highly prevalent in older people. Its serious adverse consequences, such as disability, are considered to be a public health problem. Therefore, disability prevention in community-dwelling frail older people is considered to be a priority for research and clinical practice in geriatric care. With regard to disability prevention, valid screening instruments are needed to identify frail older people in time. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the psychometric properties of three screening instruments: the Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI), the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) and the Sherbrooke Postal Questionnaire (SPQ). For validation purposes the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale (GARS) was added. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 687 community-dwelling older people (≥ 70 years). Agreement between instruments, internal consistency, and construct validity of instruments were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: The response rate was 77%. Prevalence estimates of frailty ranged from 40% to 59%. The highest agreement was found between the GFI and the TFI (Cohen's kappa = 0.74). Cronbach's alpha for the GFI, the TFI and the SPQ was 0.73, 0.79 and 0.26, respectively. Scores on the three instruments correlated significantly with each other (GFI - TFI, r = 0.87; GFI - SPQ, r = 0.47; TFI - SPQ, r = 0.42) and with the GARS (GFI - GARS, r = 0.57; TFI - GARS, r = 0.61; SPQ - GARS, r = 0.46). The GFI and the TFI scores were, as expected, significantly related to age, sex, education and income. CONCLUSIONS: The GFI and the TFI showed high internal consistency and construct validity in contrast to the SPQ. Based on these findings it is not yet possible to conclude whether the GFI or the TFI should be preferred; data on the predictive values of both instruments are needed. The SPQ seems less appropriate for postal screening of frailty among community-dwelling older people. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2868816 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28688162010-05-13 The psychometric properties of three self-report screening instruments for identifying frail older people in the community Metzelthin, Silke F Daniëls, Ramon van Rossum, Erik de Witte, Luc van den Heuvel, Wim JA Kempen, Gertrudis IJM BMC Public Health Research article BACKGROUND: Frailty is highly prevalent in older people. Its serious adverse consequences, such as disability, are considered to be a public health problem. Therefore, disability prevention in community-dwelling frail older people is considered to be a priority for research and clinical practice in geriatric care. With regard to disability prevention, valid screening instruments are needed to identify frail older people in time. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the psychometric properties of three screening instruments: the Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI), the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) and the Sherbrooke Postal Questionnaire (SPQ). For validation purposes the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale (GARS) was added. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 687 community-dwelling older people (≥ 70 years). Agreement between instruments, internal consistency, and construct validity of instruments were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: The response rate was 77%. Prevalence estimates of frailty ranged from 40% to 59%. The highest agreement was found between the GFI and the TFI (Cohen's kappa = 0.74). Cronbach's alpha for the GFI, the TFI and the SPQ was 0.73, 0.79 and 0.26, respectively. Scores on the three instruments correlated significantly with each other (GFI - TFI, r = 0.87; GFI - SPQ, r = 0.47; TFI - SPQ, r = 0.42) and with the GARS (GFI - GARS, r = 0.57; TFI - GARS, r = 0.61; SPQ - GARS, r = 0.46). The GFI and the TFI scores were, as expected, significantly related to age, sex, education and income. CONCLUSIONS: The GFI and the TFI showed high internal consistency and construct validity in contrast to the SPQ. Based on these findings it is not yet possible to conclude whether the GFI or the TFI should be preferred; data on the predictive values of both instruments are needed. The SPQ seems less appropriate for postal screening of frailty among community-dwelling older people. BioMed Central 2010-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC2868816/ /pubmed/20353611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-176 Text en Copyright ©2010 Metzelthin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research article Metzelthin, Silke F Daniëls, Ramon van Rossum, Erik de Witte, Luc van den Heuvel, Wim JA Kempen, Gertrudis IJM The psychometric properties of three self-report screening instruments for identifying frail older people in the community |
title | The psychometric properties of three self-report screening instruments for identifying frail older people in the community |
title_full | The psychometric properties of three self-report screening instruments for identifying frail older people in the community |
title_fullStr | The psychometric properties of three self-report screening instruments for identifying frail older people in the community |
title_full_unstemmed | The psychometric properties of three self-report screening instruments for identifying frail older people in the community |
title_short | The psychometric properties of three self-report screening instruments for identifying frail older people in the community |
title_sort | psychometric properties of three self-report screening instruments for identifying frail older people in the community |
topic | Research article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2868816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20353611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-176 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT metzelthinsilkef thepsychometricpropertiesofthreeselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforidentifyingfrailolderpeopleinthecommunity AT danielsramon thepsychometricpropertiesofthreeselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforidentifyingfrailolderpeopleinthecommunity AT vanrossumerik thepsychometricpropertiesofthreeselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforidentifyingfrailolderpeopleinthecommunity AT dewitteluc thepsychometricpropertiesofthreeselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforidentifyingfrailolderpeopleinthecommunity AT vandenheuvelwimja thepsychometricpropertiesofthreeselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforidentifyingfrailolderpeopleinthecommunity AT kempengertrudisijm thepsychometricpropertiesofthreeselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforidentifyingfrailolderpeopleinthecommunity AT metzelthinsilkef psychometricpropertiesofthreeselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforidentifyingfrailolderpeopleinthecommunity AT danielsramon psychometricpropertiesofthreeselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforidentifyingfrailolderpeopleinthecommunity AT vanrossumerik psychometricpropertiesofthreeselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforidentifyingfrailolderpeopleinthecommunity AT dewitteluc psychometricpropertiesofthreeselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforidentifyingfrailolderpeopleinthecommunity AT vandenheuvelwimja psychometricpropertiesofthreeselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforidentifyingfrailolderpeopleinthecommunity AT kempengertrudisijm psychometricpropertiesofthreeselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforidentifyingfrailolderpeopleinthecommunity |