Cargando…

The psychometric properties of three self-report screening instruments for identifying frail older people in the community

BACKGROUND: Frailty is highly prevalent in older people. Its serious adverse consequences, such as disability, are considered to be a public health problem. Therefore, disability prevention in community-dwelling frail older people is considered to be a priority for research and clinical practice in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Metzelthin, Silke F, Daniëls, Ramon, van Rossum, Erik, de Witte, Luc, van den Heuvel, Wim JA, Kempen, Gertrudis IJM
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2868816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20353611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-176
_version_ 1782181068163514368
author Metzelthin, Silke F
Daniëls, Ramon
van Rossum, Erik
de Witte, Luc
van den Heuvel, Wim JA
Kempen, Gertrudis IJM
author_facet Metzelthin, Silke F
Daniëls, Ramon
van Rossum, Erik
de Witte, Luc
van den Heuvel, Wim JA
Kempen, Gertrudis IJM
author_sort Metzelthin, Silke F
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Frailty is highly prevalent in older people. Its serious adverse consequences, such as disability, are considered to be a public health problem. Therefore, disability prevention in community-dwelling frail older people is considered to be a priority for research and clinical practice in geriatric care. With regard to disability prevention, valid screening instruments are needed to identify frail older people in time. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the psychometric properties of three screening instruments: the Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI), the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) and the Sherbrooke Postal Questionnaire (SPQ). For validation purposes the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale (GARS) was added. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 687 community-dwelling older people (≥ 70 years). Agreement between instruments, internal consistency, and construct validity of instruments were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: The response rate was 77%. Prevalence estimates of frailty ranged from 40% to 59%. The highest agreement was found between the GFI and the TFI (Cohen's kappa = 0.74). Cronbach's alpha for the GFI, the TFI and the SPQ was 0.73, 0.79 and 0.26, respectively. Scores on the three instruments correlated significantly with each other (GFI - TFI, r = 0.87; GFI - SPQ, r = 0.47; TFI - SPQ, r = 0.42) and with the GARS (GFI - GARS, r = 0.57; TFI - GARS, r = 0.61; SPQ - GARS, r = 0.46). The GFI and the TFI scores were, as expected, significantly related to age, sex, education and income. CONCLUSIONS: The GFI and the TFI showed high internal consistency and construct validity in contrast to the SPQ. Based on these findings it is not yet possible to conclude whether the GFI or the TFI should be preferred; data on the predictive values of both instruments are needed. The SPQ seems less appropriate for postal screening of frailty among community-dwelling older people.
format Text
id pubmed-2868816
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28688162010-05-13 The psychometric properties of three self-report screening instruments for identifying frail older people in the community Metzelthin, Silke F Daniëls, Ramon van Rossum, Erik de Witte, Luc van den Heuvel, Wim JA Kempen, Gertrudis IJM BMC Public Health Research article BACKGROUND: Frailty is highly prevalent in older people. Its serious adverse consequences, such as disability, are considered to be a public health problem. Therefore, disability prevention in community-dwelling frail older people is considered to be a priority for research and clinical practice in geriatric care. With regard to disability prevention, valid screening instruments are needed to identify frail older people in time. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the psychometric properties of three screening instruments: the Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI), the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) and the Sherbrooke Postal Questionnaire (SPQ). For validation purposes the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale (GARS) was added. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 687 community-dwelling older people (≥ 70 years). Agreement between instruments, internal consistency, and construct validity of instruments were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: The response rate was 77%. Prevalence estimates of frailty ranged from 40% to 59%. The highest agreement was found between the GFI and the TFI (Cohen's kappa = 0.74). Cronbach's alpha for the GFI, the TFI and the SPQ was 0.73, 0.79 and 0.26, respectively. Scores on the three instruments correlated significantly with each other (GFI - TFI, r = 0.87; GFI - SPQ, r = 0.47; TFI - SPQ, r = 0.42) and with the GARS (GFI - GARS, r = 0.57; TFI - GARS, r = 0.61; SPQ - GARS, r = 0.46). The GFI and the TFI scores were, as expected, significantly related to age, sex, education and income. CONCLUSIONS: The GFI and the TFI showed high internal consistency and construct validity in contrast to the SPQ. Based on these findings it is not yet possible to conclude whether the GFI or the TFI should be preferred; data on the predictive values of both instruments are needed. The SPQ seems less appropriate for postal screening of frailty among community-dwelling older people. BioMed Central 2010-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC2868816/ /pubmed/20353611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-176 Text en Copyright ©2010 Metzelthin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research article
Metzelthin, Silke F
Daniëls, Ramon
van Rossum, Erik
de Witte, Luc
van den Heuvel, Wim JA
Kempen, Gertrudis IJM
The psychometric properties of three self-report screening instruments for identifying frail older people in the community
title The psychometric properties of three self-report screening instruments for identifying frail older people in the community
title_full The psychometric properties of three self-report screening instruments for identifying frail older people in the community
title_fullStr The psychometric properties of three self-report screening instruments for identifying frail older people in the community
title_full_unstemmed The psychometric properties of three self-report screening instruments for identifying frail older people in the community
title_short The psychometric properties of three self-report screening instruments for identifying frail older people in the community
title_sort psychometric properties of three self-report screening instruments for identifying frail older people in the community
topic Research article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2868816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20353611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-176
work_keys_str_mv AT metzelthinsilkef thepsychometricpropertiesofthreeselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforidentifyingfrailolderpeopleinthecommunity
AT danielsramon thepsychometricpropertiesofthreeselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforidentifyingfrailolderpeopleinthecommunity
AT vanrossumerik thepsychometricpropertiesofthreeselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforidentifyingfrailolderpeopleinthecommunity
AT dewitteluc thepsychometricpropertiesofthreeselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforidentifyingfrailolderpeopleinthecommunity
AT vandenheuvelwimja thepsychometricpropertiesofthreeselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforidentifyingfrailolderpeopleinthecommunity
AT kempengertrudisijm thepsychometricpropertiesofthreeselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforidentifyingfrailolderpeopleinthecommunity
AT metzelthinsilkef psychometricpropertiesofthreeselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforidentifyingfrailolderpeopleinthecommunity
AT danielsramon psychometricpropertiesofthreeselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforidentifyingfrailolderpeopleinthecommunity
AT vanrossumerik psychometricpropertiesofthreeselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforidentifyingfrailolderpeopleinthecommunity
AT dewitteluc psychometricpropertiesofthreeselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforidentifyingfrailolderpeopleinthecommunity
AT vandenheuvelwimja psychometricpropertiesofthreeselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforidentifyingfrailolderpeopleinthecommunity
AT kempengertrudisijm psychometricpropertiesofthreeselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforidentifyingfrailolderpeopleinthecommunity