Cargando…
Do coder characteristics influence validity of ICD-10 hospital discharge data?
BACKGROUND: Administrative data are widely used to study health systems and make important health policy decisions. Yet little is known about the influence of coder characteristics on administrative data validity in these studies. Our goal was to describe the relationship between several measures of...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2868845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20409320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-99 |
_version_ | 1782181073732501504 |
---|---|
author | Hennessy, Deirdre A Quan, Hude Faris, Peter D Beck, Cynthia A |
author_facet | Hennessy, Deirdre A Quan, Hude Faris, Peter D Beck, Cynthia A |
author_sort | Hennessy, Deirdre A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Administrative data are widely used to study health systems and make important health policy decisions. Yet little is known about the influence of coder characteristics on administrative data validity in these studies. Our goal was to describe the relationship between several measures of validity in coded hospital discharge data and 1) coders' volume of coding (≥13,000 vs. <13,000 records), 2) coders' employment status (full- vs. part-time), and 3) hospital type. METHODS: This descriptive study examined 6 indicators of face validity in ICD-10 coded discharge records from 4 hospitals in Calgary, Canada between April 2002 and March 2007. Specifically, mean number of coded diagnoses, procedures, complications, Z-codes, and codes ending in 8 or 9 were compared by coding volume and employment status, as well as hospital type. The mean number of diagnoses was also compared across coder characteristics for 6 major conditions of varying complexity. Next, kappa statistics were computed to assess agreement between discharge data and linked chart data reabstracted by nursing chart reviewers. Kappas were compared across coder characteristics. RESULTS: 422,618 discharge records were coded by 59 coders during the study period. The mean number of diagnoses per record decreased from 5.2 in 2002/2003 to 3.9 in 2006/2007, while the number of records coded annually increased from 69,613 to 102,842. Coders at the tertiary hospital coded the most diagnoses (5.0 compared with 3.9 and 3.8 at other sites). There was no variation by coder or site characteristics for any other face validity indicator. The mean number of diagnoses increased from 1.5 to 7.9 with increasing complexity of the major diagnosis, but did not vary with coder characteristics. Agreement (kappa) between coded data and chart review did not show any consistent pattern with respect to coder characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: This large study suggests that coder characteristics do not influence the validity of hospital discharge data. Other jurisdictions might benefit from implementing similar employment programs to ours, e.g.: a requirement for a 2-year college training program, a single management structure across sites, and rotation of coders between sites. Limitations include few coder characteristics available for study due to privacy concerns. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2868845 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28688452010-05-13 Do coder characteristics influence validity of ICD-10 hospital discharge data? Hennessy, Deirdre A Quan, Hude Faris, Peter D Beck, Cynthia A BMC Health Serv Res Research article BACKGROUND: Administrative data are widely used to study health systems and make important health policy decisions. Yet little is known about the influence of coder characteristics on administrative data validity in these studies. Our goal was to describe the relationship between several measures of validity in coded hospital discharge data and 1) coders' volume of coding (≥13,000 vs. <13,000 records), 2) coders' employment status (full- vs. part-time), and 3) hospital type. METHODS: This descriptive study examined 6 indicators of face validity in ICD-10 coded discharge records from 4 hospitals in Calgary, Canada between April 2002 and March 2007. Specifically, mean number of coded diagnoses, procedures, complications, Z-codes, and codes ending in 8 or 9 were compared by coding volume and employment status, as well as hospital type. The mean number of diagnoses was also compared across coder characteristics for 6 major conditions of varying complexity. Next, kappa statistics were computed to assess agreement between discharge data and linked chart data reabstracted by nursing chart reviewers. Kappas were compared across coder characteristics. RESULTS: 422,618 discharge records were coded by 59 coders during the study period. The mean number of diagnoses per record decreased from 5.2 in 2002/2003 to 3.9 in 2006/2007, while the number of records coded annually increased from 69,613 to 102,842. Coders at the tertiary hospital coded the most diagnoses (5.0 compared with 3.9 and 3.8 at other sites). There was no variation by coder or site characteristics for any other face validity indicator. The mean number of diagnoses increased from 1.5 to 7.9 with increasing complexity of the major diagnosis, but did not vary with coder characteristics. Agreement (kappa) between coded data and chart review did not show any consistent pattern with respect to coder characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: This large study suggests that coder characteristics do not influence the validity of hospital discharge data. Other jurisdictions might benefit from implementing similar employment programs to ours, e.g.: a requirement for a 2-year college training program, a single management structure across sites, and rotation of coders between sites. Limitations include few coder characteristics available for study due to privacy concerns. BioMed Central 2010-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2868845/ /pubmed/20409320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-99 Text en Copyright ©2010 Hennessy et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research article Hennessy, Deirdre A Quan, Hude Faris, Peter D Beck, Cynthia A Do coder characteristics influence validity of ICD-10 hospital discharge data? |
title | Do coder characteristics influence validity of ICD-10 hospital discharge data? |
title_full | Do coder characteristics influence validity of ICD-10 hospital discharge data? |
title_fullStr | Do coder characteristics influence validity of ICD-10 hospital discharge data? |
title_full_unstemmed | Do coder characteristics influence validity of ICD-10 hospital discharge data? |
title_short | Do coder characteristics influence validity of ICD-10 hospital discharge data? |
title_sort | do coder characteristics influence validity of icd-10 hospital discharge data? |
topic | Research article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2868845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20409320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-99 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hennessydeirdrea docodercharacteristicsinfluencevalidityoficd10hospitaldischargedata AT quanhude docodercharacteristicsinfluencevalidityoficd10hospitaldischargedata AT farispeterd docodercharacteristicsinfluencevalidityoficd10hospitaldischargedata AT beckcynthiaa docodercharacteristicsinfluencevalidityoficd10hospitaldischargedata |