Cargando…

Costs and effects of two public sector delivery channels for long-lasting insecticidal nets in Uganda

BACKGROUND: In Uganda, long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLIN) have been predominantly delivered through two public sector channels: targeted campaigns or routine antenatal care (ANC) services. Their combination in a mixed-model strategy is being advocated to quickly increase LLIN coverage and maintai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kolaczinski, Jan H, Kolaczinski, Kate, Kyabayinze, Daniel, Strachan, Daniel, Temperley, Matilda, Wijayanandana, Nayantara, Kilian, Albert
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2868859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20406448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-9-102
_version_ 1782181077211676672
author Kolaczinski, Jan H
Kolaczinski, Kate
Kyabayinze, Daniel
Strachan, Daniel
Temperley, Matilda
Wijayanandana, Nayantara
Kilian, Albert
author_facet Kolaczinski, Jan H
Kolaczinski, Kate
Kyabayinze, Daniel
Strachan, Daniel
Temperley, Matilda
Wijayanandana, Nayantara
Kilian, Albert
author_sort Kolaczinski, Jan H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In Uganda, long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLIN) have been predominantly delivered through two public sector channels: targeted campaigns or routine antenatal care (ANC) services. Their combination in a mixed-model strategy is being advocated to quickly increase LLIN coverage and maintain it over time, but there is little evidence on the efficiency of each system. This study evaluated the two delivery channels regarding LLIN retention and use, and estimated the associated costs, to contribute towards the evidence-base on LLIN delivery channels in Uganda. METHODS: Household surveys were conducted 5-7 months after LLIN distribution, combining questionnaires with visual verification of LLIN presence. Focus groups and interviews were conducted to further investigate determinants of LLIN retention and use. Campaign distribution was evaluated in Jinja and Adjumani while ANC distribution was evaluated only in the latter district. Costs were calculated from the provider perspective through retrospective analysis of expenditure data, and effects were estimated as cost per LLIN delivered and cost per treated-net-year (TNY). These effects were calculated for the total number of LLINs delivered and for those retained and used. RESULTS: After 5-7 months, over 90% of LLINs were still owned by recipients, and between 74% (Jinja) and 99% (ANC Adjumani) were being used. Costing results showed that delivery was cheapest for the campaign in Jinja and highest for the ANC channel, with economic delivery cost per net retained and used of USD 1.10 and USD 2.31, respectively. Financial delivery costs for the two channels were similar in the same location, USD 1.04 for campaign or USD 1.07 for ANC delivery in Adjumani, but differed between locations (USD 0.67 for campaign delivery in Jinja). Economic cost for ANC distribution were considerably higher (USD 2.27) compared to campaign costs (USD 1.23) in Adjumani. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted campaigns and routine ANC services can both achieve high LLIN retention and use among the target population. The comparatively higher economic cost of delivery through ANC facilities was at least partially due to the relatively short time this system had been in existence. Further studies comparing the cost of well-established ANC delivery with LLIN campaigns and other delivery channels are thus encouraged.
format Text
id pubmed-2868859
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28688592010-05-13 Costs and effects of two public sector delivery channels for long-lasting insecticidal nets in Uganda Kolaczinski, Jan H Kolaczinski, Kate Kyabayinze, Daniel Strachan, Daniel Temperley, Matilda Wijayanandana, Nayantara Kilian, Albert Malar J Research BACKGROUND: In Uganda, long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLIN) have been predominantly delivered through two public sector channels: targeted campaigns or routine antenatal care (ANC) services. Their combination in a mixed-model strategy is being advocated to quickly increase LLIN coverage and maintain it over time, but there is little evidence on the efficiency of each system. This study evaluated the two delivery channels regarding LLIN retention and use, and estimated the associated costs, to contribute towards the evidence-base on LLIN delivery channels in Uganda. METHODS: Household surveys were conducted 5-7 months after LLIN distribution, combining questionnaires with visual verification of LLIN presence. Focus groups and interviews were conducted to further investigate determinants of LLIN retention and use. Campaign distribution was evaluated in Jinja and Adjumani while ANC distribution was evaluated only in the latter district. Costs were calculated from the provider perspective through retrospective analysis of expenditure data, and effects were estimated as cost per LLIN delivered and cost per treated-net-year (TNY). These effects were calculated for the total number of LLINs delivered and for those retained and used. RESULTS: After 5-7 months, over 90% of LLINs were still owned by recipients, and between 74% (Jinja) and 99% (ANC Adjumani) were being used. Costing results showed that delivery was cheapest for the campaign in Jinja and highest for the ANC channel, with economic delivery cost per net retained and used of USD 1.10 and USD 2.31, respectively. Financial delivery costs for the two channels were similar in the same location, USD 1.04 for campaign or USD 1.07 for ANC delivery in Adjumani, but differed between locations (USD 0.67 for campaign delivery in Jinja). Economic cost for ANC distribution were considerably higher (USD 2.27) compared to campaign costs (USD 1.23) in Adjumani. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted campaigns and routine ANC services can both achieve high LLIN retention and use among the target population. The comparatively higher economic cost of delivery through ANC facilities was at least partially due to the relatively short time this system had been in existence. Further studies comparing the cost of well-established ANC delivery with LLIN campaigns and other delivery channels are thus encouraged. BioMed Central 2010-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2868859/ /pubmed/20406448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-9-102 Text en Copyright ©2010 Kolaczinski et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Kolaczinski, Jan H
Kolaczinski, Kate
Kyabayinze, Daniel
Strachan, Daniel
Temperley, Matilda
Wijayanandana, Nayantara
Kilian, Albert
Costs and effects of two public sector delivery channels for long-lasting insecticidal nets in Uganda
title Costs and effects of two public sector delivery channels for long-lasting insecticidal nets in Uganda
title_full Costs and effects of two public sector delivery channels for long-lasting insecticidal nets in Uganda
title_fullStr Costs and effects of two public sector delivery channels for long-lasting insecticidal nets in Uganda
title_full_unstemmed Costs and effects of two public sector delivery channels for long-lasting insecticidal nets in Uganda
title_short Costs and effects of two public sector delivery channels for long-lasting insecticidal nets in Uganda
title_sort costs and effects of two public sector delivery channels for long-lasting insecticidal nets in uganda
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2868859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20406448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-9-102
work_keys_str_mv AT kolaczinskijanh costsandeffectsoftwopublicsectordeliverychannelsforlonglastinginsecticidalnetsinuganda
AT kolaczinskikate costsandeffectsoftwopublicsectordeliverychannelsforlonglastinginsecticidalnetsinuganda
AT kyabayinzedaniel costsandeffectsoftwopublicsectordeliverychannelsforlonglastinginsecticidalnetsinuganda
AT strachandaniel costsandeffectsoftwopublicsectordeliverychannelsforlonglastinginsecticidalnetsinuganda
AT temperleymatilda costsandeffectsoftwopublicsectordeliverychannelsforlonglastinginsecticidalnetsinuganda
AT wijayanandananayantara costsandeffectsoftwopublicsectordeliverychannelsforlonglastinginsecticidalnetsinuganda
AT kilianalbert costsandeffectsoftwopublicsectordeliverychannelsforlonglastinginsecticidalnetsinuganda