Cargando…

Multicenter Validation Study of a Transplantation-Specific Cytogenetics Grouping Scheme for Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Cytogenetics are an important prognostic factor for patients with MDS. However, existing cytogenetics grouping schemes are based on patients treated with supportive care, and may not be optimal for patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). We previously proposed an SCT-specific...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Armand, Philippe, Deeg, H. Joachim, Kim, Haesook T., Lee, Hun, Armistead, Paul, de Lima, Marcos, Gupta, Vikas, Soiffer, Robert J.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2868955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19784076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2009.253
_version_ 1782181090870427648
author Armand, Philippe
Deeg, H. Joachim
Kim, Haesook T.
Lee, Hun
Armistead, Paul
de Lima, Marcos
Gupta, Vikas
Soiffer, Robert J.
author_facet Armand, Philippe
Deeg, H. Joachim
Kim, Haesook T.
Lee, Hun
Armistead, Paul
de Lima, Marcos
Gupta, Vikas
Soiffer, Robert J.
author_sort Armand, Philippe
collection PubMed
description Cytogenetics are an important prognostic factor for patients with MDS. However, existing cytogenetics grouping schemes are based on patients treated with supportive care, and may not be optimal for patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). We previously proposed an SCT-specific cytogenetics grouping scheme for patients with MDS and AML arising from MDS, based on an analysis of patients transplanted at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Under this scheme, abnormalities of chromosome 7 and complex karyotype are considered adverse-risk, while all others are considered standard-risk. In the present retrospective study, we validated this scheme on an independent multicenter cohort of 546 patients. Adverse cytogenetics was the strongest prognostic factor for outcome in this cohort. Four-year relapse-free and overall survival were 42% and 46%, respectively, in the standard risk group, versus 21% and 23% in the adverse group (p<0.0001 for both comparisons). This grouping scheme retained its prognostic significance irrespective of patient age, disease type, prior leukemogenic therapy, and conditioning intensity. Therapy-related disease was not associated with increased mortality in this cohort, after taking cytogenetics into account. We propose that this SCT-specific cytogenetics grouping scheme be used for patients with MDS or AML arising from MDS who are considering or undergoing SCT.
format Text
id pubmed-2868955
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28689552010-11-01 Multicenter Validation Study of a Transplantation-Specific Cytogenetics Grouping Scheme for Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes Armand, Philippe Deeg, H. Joachim Kim, Haesook T. Lee, Hun Armistead, Paul de Lima, Marcos Gupta, Vikas Soiffer, Robert J. Bone Marrow Transplant Article Cytogenetics are an important prognostic factor for patients with MDS. However, existing cytogenetics grouping schemes are based on patients treated with supportive care, and may not be optimal for patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). We previously proposed an SCT-specific cytogenetics grouping scheme for patients with MDS and AML arising from MDS, based on an analysis of patients transplanted at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Under this scheme, abnormalities of chromosome 7 and complex karyotype are considered adverse-risk, while all others are considered standard-risk. In the present retrospective study, we validated this scheme on an independent multicenter cohort of 546 patients. Adverse cytogenetics was the strongest prognostic factor for outcome in this cohort. Four-year relapse-free and overall survival were 42% and 46%, respectively, in the standard risk group, versus 21% and 23% in the adverse group (p<0.0001 for both comparisons). This grouping scheme retained its prognostic significance irrespective of patient age, disease type, prior leukemogenic therapy, and conditioning intensity. Therapy-related disease was not associated with increased mortality in this cohort, after taking cytogenetics into account. We propose that this SCT-specific cytogenetics grouping scheme be used for patients with MDS or AML arising from MDS who are considering or undergoing SCT. 2009-09-28 2010-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2868955/ /pubmed/19784076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2009.253 Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Armand, Philippe
Deeg, H. Joachim
Kim, Haesook T.
Lee, Hun
Armistead, Paul
de Lima, Marcos
Gupta, Vikas
Soiffer, Robert J.
Multicenter Validation Study of a Transplantation-Specific Cytogenetics Grouping Scheme for Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes
title Multicenter Validation Study of a Transplantation-Specific Cytogenetics Grouping Scheme for Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes
title_full Multicenter Validation Study of a Transplantation-Specific Cytogenetics Grouping Scheme for Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes
title_fullStr Multicenter Validation Study of a Transplantation-Specific Cytogenetics Grouping Scheme for Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes
title_full_unstemmed Multicenter Validation Study of a Transplantation-Specific Cytogenetics Grouping Scheme for Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes
title_short Multicenter Validation Study of a Transplantation-Specific Cytogenetics Grouping Scheme for Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes
title_sort multicenter validation study of a transplantation-specific cytogenetics grouping scheme for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2868955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19784076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2009.253
work_keys_str_mv AT armandphilippe multicentervalidationstudyofatransplantationspecificcytogeneticsgroupingschemeforpatientswithmyelodysplasticsyndromes
AT deeghjoachim multicentervalidationstudyofatransplantationspecificcytogeneticsgroupingschemeforpatientswithmyelodysplasticsyndromes
AT kimhaesookt multicentervalidationstudyofatransplantationspecificcytogeneticsgroupingschemeforpatientswithmyelodysplasticsyndromes
AT leehun multicentervalidationstudyofatransplantationspecificcytogeneticsgroupingschemeforpatientswithmyelodysplasticsyndromes
AT armisteadpaul multicentervalidationstudyofatransplantationspecificcytogeneticsgroupingschemeforpatientswithmyelodysplasticsyndromes
AT delimamarcos multicentervalidationstudyofatransplantationspecificcytogeneticsgroupingschemeforpatientswithmyelodysplasticsyndromes
AT guptavikas multicentervalidationstudyofatransplantationspecificcytogeneticsgroupingschemeforpatientswithmyelodysplasticsyndromes
AT soifferrobertj multicentervalidationstudyofatransplantationspecificcytogeneticsgroupingschemeforpatientswithmyelodysplasticsyndromes