Cargando…

Frovatriptan versus zolmitriptan for the acute treatment of migraine: a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian study

The objective of this study is to assess patients’ satisfaction with migraine treatment with frovatriptan (F) or zolmitriptan (Z), by preference questionnaire. 133 subjects with a history of migraine with or without aura (IHS criteria) were randomized to F 2.5 mg or Z 2.5 mg. The study had a multice...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tullo, Vincenzo, Allais, Gianni, Ferrari, Michel D., Curone, Marcella, Mea, Eliana, Omboni, Stefano, Benedetto, Chiara, Zava, Dario, Bussone, Gennaro
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2869037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20464583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-010-0273-x
_version_ 1782181096044101632
author Tullo, Vincenzo
Allais, Gianni
Ferrari, Michel D.
Curone, Marcella
Mea, Eliana
Omboni, Stefano
Benedetto, Chiara
Zava, Dario
Bussone, Gennaro
author_facet Tullo, Vincenzo
Allais, Gianni
Ferrari, Michel D.
Curone, Marcella
Mea, Eliana
Omboni, Stefano
Benedetto, Chiara
Zava, Dario
Bussone, Gennaro
author_sort Tullo, Vincenzo
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study is to assess patients’ satisfaction with migraine treatment with frovatriptan (F) or zolmitriptan (Z), by preference questionnaire. 133 subjects with a history of migraine with or without aura (IHS criteria) were randomized to F 2.5 mg or Z 2.5 mg. The study had a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, cross-over design, with each of the two treatment periods lasting no more than 3 months. At the end of the study, patients were asked to assign preference to one of the treatments (primary endpoint). The number of pain-free (PF) and pain-relief (PR) episodes at 2 h, and number of recurrent and sustained pain-free (SPF) episodes within 48 h were the secondary study endpoints. Seventy-seven percent of patients expressed a preference. Average score of preference was 2.9 ± 1.3 (F) versus 3.0 ± 1.3 (Z; p = NS). Rate of PF episodes at 2 h was 26% with F and 31% with Z (p = NS). PR episodes at 2 h were 57% for F and 58% for Z (p = NS). Rate of recurrence was 21 (F) and 24% (Z; p = NS). Time to recurrence within 48 h was better for F especially between 4 and 16 h (p < 0.05). SPF episodes were 18 (F) versus 22% (Z; p = NS). Drug-related adverse events were significantly (p < 0.05) less under F (3 vs. 10). In conclusion, our study suggests that F has a similar efficacy of Z, with some advantage as regards tolerability and recurrence.
format Text
id pubmed-2869037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28690372010-05-24 Frovatriptan versus zolmitriptan for the acute treatment of migraine: a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian study Tullo, Vincenzo Allais, Gianni Ferrari, Michel D. Curone, Marcella Mea, Eliana Omboni, Stefano Benedetto, Chiara Zava, Dario Bussone, Gennaro Neurol Sci Symposium: News in Treatment of Migraine Attack The objective of this study is to assess patients’ satisfaction with migraine treatment with frovatriptan (F) or zolmitriptan (Z), by preference questionnaire. 133 subjects with a history of migraine with or without aura (IHS criteria) were randomized to F 2.5 mg or Z 2.5 mg. The study had a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, cross-over design, with each of the two treatment periods lasting no more than 3 months. At the end of the study, patients were asked to assign preference to one of the treatments (primary endpoint). The number of pain-free (PF) and pain-relief (PR) episodes at 2 h, and number of recurrent and sustained pain-free (SPF) episodes within 48 h were the secondary study endpoints. Seventy-seven percent of patients expressed a preference. Average score of preference was 2.9 ± 1.3 (F) versus 3.0 ± 1.3 (Z; p = NS). Rate of PF episodes at 2 h was 26% with F and 31% with Z (p = NS). PR episodes at 2 h were 57% for F and 58% for Z (p = NS). Rate of recurrence was 21 (F) and 24% (Z; p = NS). Time to recurrence within 48 h was better for F especially between 4 and 16 h (p < 0.05). SPF episodes were 18 (F) versus 22% (Z; p = NS). Drug-related adverse events were significantly (p < 0.05) less under F (3 vs. 10). In conclusion, our study suggests that F has a similar efficacy of Z, with some advantage as regards tolerability and recurrence. Springer Milan 2010-05-13 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2869037/ /pubmed/20464583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-010-0273-x Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Symposium: News in Treatment of Migraine Attack
Tullo, Vincenzo
Allais, Gianni
Ferrari, Michel D.
Curone, Marcella
Mea, Eliana
Omboni, Stefano
Benedetto, Chiara
Zava, Dario
Bussone, Gennaro
Frovatriptan versus zolmitriptan for the acute treatment of migraine: a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian study
title Frovatriptan versus zolmitriptan for the acute treatment of migraine: a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian study
title_full Frovatriptan versus zolmitriptan for the acute treatment of migraine: a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian study
title_fullStr Frovatriptan versus zolmitriptan for the acute treatment of migraine: a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian study
title_full_unstemmed Frovatriptan versus zolmitriptan for the acute treatment of migraine: a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian study
title_short Frovatriptan versus zolmitriptan for the acute treatment of migraine: a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian study
title_sort frovatriptan versus zolmitriptan for the acute treatment of migraine: a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, italian study
topic Symposium: News in Treatment of Migraine Attack
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2869037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20464583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-010-0273-x
work_keys_str_mv AT tullovincenzo frovatriptanversuszolmitriptanfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineadoubleblindrandomizedmulticenteritalianstudy
AT allaisgianni frovatriptanversuszolmitriptanfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineadoubleblindrandomizedmulticenteritalianstudy
AT ferrarimicheld frovatriptanversuszolmitriptanfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineadoubleblindrandomizedmulticenteritalianstudy
AT curonemarcella frovatriptanversuszolmitriptanfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineadoubleblindrandomizedmulticenteritalianstudy
AT meaeliana frovatriptanversuszolmitriptanfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineadoubleblindrandomizedmulticenteritalianstudy
AT ombonistefano frovatriptanversuszolmitriptanfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineadoubleblindrandomizedmulticenteritalianstudy
AT benedettochiara frovatriptanversuszolmitriptanfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineadoubleblindrandomizedmulticenteritalianstudy
AT zavadario frovatriptanversuszolmitriptanfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineadoubleblindrandomizedmulticenteritalianstudy
AT bussonegennaro frovatriptanversuszolmitriptanfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineadoubleblindrandomizedmulticenteritalianstudy