Cargando…
Frovatriptan versus zolmitriptan for the acute treatment of migraine: a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian study
The objective of this study is to assess patients’ satisfaction with migraine treatment with frovatriptan (F) or zolmitriptan (Z), by preference questionnaire. 133 subjects with a history of migraine with or without aura (IHS criteria) were randomized to F 2.5 mg or Z 2.5 mg. The study had a multice...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Milan
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2869037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20464583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-010-0273-x |
_version_ | 1782181096044101632 |
---|---|
author | Tullo, Vincenzo Allais, Gianni Ferrari, Michel D. Curone, Marcella Mea, Eliana Omboni, Stefano Benedetto, Chiara Zava, Dario Bussone, Gennaro |
author_facet | Tullo, Vincenzo Allais, Gianni Ferrari, Michel D. Curone, Marcella Mea, Eliana Omboni, Stefano Benedetto, Chiara Zava, Dario Bussone, Gennaro |
author_sort | Tullo, Vincenzo |
collection | PubMed |
description | The objective of this study is to assess patients’ satisfaction with migraine treatment with frovatriptan (F) or zolmitriptan (Z), by preference questionnaire. 133 subjects with a history of migraine with or without aura (IHS criteria) were randomized to F 2.5 mg or Z 2.5 mg. The study had a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, cross-over design, with each of the two treatment periods lasting no more than 3 months. At the end of the study, patients were asked to assign preference to one of the treatments (primary endpoint). The number of pain-free (PF) and pain-relief (PR) episodes at 2 h, and number of recurrent and sustained pain-free (SPF) episodes within 48 h were the secondary study endpoints. Seventy-seven percent of patients expressed a preference. Average score of preference was 2.9 ± 1.3 (F) versus 3.0 ± 1.3 (Z; p = NS). Rate of PF episodes at 2 h was 26% with F and 31% with Z (p = NS). PR episodes at 2 h were 57% for F and 58% for Z (p = NS). Rate of recurrence was 21 (F) and 24% (Z; p = NS). Time to recurrence within 48 h was better for F especially between 4 and 16 h (p < 0.05). SPF episodes were 18 (F) versus 22% (Z; p = NS). Drug-related adverse events were significantly (p < 0.05) less under F (3 vs. 10). In conclusion, our study suggests that F has a similar efficacy of Z, with some advantage as regards tolerability and recurrence. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2869037 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Springer Milan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28690372010-05-24 Frovatriptan versus zolmitriptan for the acute treatment of migraine: a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian study Tullo, Vincenzo Allais, Gianni Ferrari, Michel D. Curone, Marcella Mea, Eliana Omboni, Stefano Benedetto, Chiara Zava, Dario Bussone, Gennaro Neurol Sci Symposium: News in Treatment of Migraine Attack The objective of this study is to assess patients’ satisfaction with migraine treatment with frovatriptan (F) or zolmitriptan (Z), by preference questionnaire. 133 subjects with a history of migraine with or without aura (IHS criteria) were randomized to F 2.5 mg or Z 2.5 mg. The study had a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, cross-over design, with each of the two treatment periods lasting no more than 3 months. At the end of the study, patients were asked to assign preference to one of the treatments (primary endpoint). The number of pain-free (PF) and pain-relief (PR) episodes at 2 h, and number of recurrent and sustained pain-free (SPF) episodes within 48 h were the secondary study endpoints. Seventy-seven percent of patients expressed a preference. Average score of preference was 2.9 ± 1.3 (F) versus 3.0 ± 1.3 (Z; p = NS). Rate of PF episodes at 2 h was 26% with F and 31% with Z (p = NS). PR episodes at 2 h were 57% for F and 58% for Z (p = NS). Rate of recurrence was 21 (F) and 24% (Z; p = NS). Time to recurrence within 48 h was better for F especially between 4 and 16 h (p < 0.05). SPF episodes were 18 (F) versus 22% (Z; p = NS). Drug-related adverse events were significantly (p < 0.05) less under F (3 vs. 10). In conclusion, our study suggests that F has a similar efficacy of Z, with some advantage as regards tolerability and recurrence. Springer Milan 2010-05-13 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2869037/ /pubmed/20464583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-010-0273-x Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Symposium: News in Treatment of Migraine Attack Tullo, Vincenzo Allais, Gianni Ferrari, Michel D. Curone, Marcella Mea, Eliana Omboni, Stefano Benedetto, Chiara Zava, Dario Bussone, Gennaro Frovatriptan versus zolmitriptan for the acute treatment of migraine: a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian study |
title | Frovatriptan versus zolmitriptan for the acute treatment of migraine: a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian study |
title_full | Frovatriptan versus zolmitriptan for the acute treatment of migraine: a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian study |
title_fullStr | Frovatriptan versus zolmitriptan for the acute treatment of migraine: a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian study |
title_full_unstemmed | Frovatriptan versus zolmitriptan for the acute treatment of migraine: a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian study |
title_short | Frovatriptan versus zolmitriptan for the acute treatment of migraine: a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian study |
title_sort | frovatriptan versus zolmitriptan for the acute treatment of migraine: a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, italian study |
topic | Symposium: News in Treatment of Migraine Attack |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2869037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20464583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-010-0273-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tullovincenzo frovatriptanversuszolmitriptanfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineadoubleblindrandomizedmulticenteritalianstudy AT allaisgianni frovatriptanversuszolmitriptanfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineadoubleblindrandomizedmulticenteritalianstudy AT ferrarimicheld frovatriptanversuszolmitriptanfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineadoubleblindrandomizedmulticenteritalianstudy AT curonemarcella frovatriptanversuszolmitriptanfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineadoubleblindrandomizedmulticenteritalianstudy AT meaeliana frovatriptanversuszolmitriptanfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineadoubleblindrandomizedmulticenteritalianstudy AT ombonistefano frovatriptanversuszolmitriptanfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineadoubleblindrandomizedmulticenteritalianstudy AT benedettochiara frovatriptanversuszolmitriptanfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineadoubleblindrandomizedmulticenteritalianstudy AT zavadario frovatriptanversuszolmitriptanfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineadoubleblindrandomizedmulticenteritalianstudy AT bussonegennaro frovatriptanversuszolmitriptanfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineadoubleblindrandomizedmulticenteritalianstudy |