Cargando…

Repeatability of short-duration transient visual evoked potentials in normal subjects

To evaluate the within-session and inter-session repeatability of a new, short-duration transient visual evoked potential (SD-tVEP) device on normal individuals, we tested 30 normal subjects (20/20 visual acuity, normal 24-2 SITA Standard VF) with SD-tVEP. Ten of these subjects had their tests repea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tello, Celso, De Moraes, Carlos Gustavo V., Prata, Tiago S., Derr, Peter, Patel, Jayson, Siegfried, John, Liebmann, Jeffrey M., Ritch, Robert
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2869044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20111979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10633-010-9216-3
_version_ 1782181096504426496
author Tello, Celso
De Moraes, Carlos Gustavo V.
Prata, Tiago S.
Derr, Peter
Patel, Jayson
Siegfried, John
Liebmann, Jeffrey M.
Ritch, Robert
author_facet Tello, Celso
De Moraes, Carlos Gustavo V.
Prata, Tiago S.
Derr, Peter
Patel, Jayson
Siegfried, John
Liebmann, Jeffrey M.
Ritch, Robert
author_sort Tello, Celso
collection PubMed
description To evaluate the within-session and inter-session repeatability of a new, short-duration transient visual evoked potential (SD-tVEP) device on normal individuals, we tested 30 normal subjects (20/20 visual acuity, normal 24-2 SITA Standard VF) with SD-tVEP. Ten of these subjects had their tests repeated within 1–2 months from the initial visit. Synchronized single-channel EEG was recorded using a modified Diopsys Enfant™ System (Diopsys, Inc., Pine Brook, New Jersey, USA). A checkerboard stimulus was modulated at two reversals per second. Two different contrasts of checkerboard reversal patterns were used: 85% Michelson contrast with a mean luminance of 66.25 cd/m(2) and 10% Michelson contrast with a mean luminance of 112 cd/m(2). Each test lasted 20 s. Both eyes, independently and together, were tested 10 times (5 times at each contrast level). The following information was identified from the filtered N75-P100-N135 complex: N75 amplitude, N75 latency, P100 amplitude, P100 latency, and Delta Amplitude (N75-P100). The median values for each eye’s five SD-tVEP parameters were calculated and grouped into two data sets based on contrast level. Mean age was 27.3 ± 5.2 years. For OD only, the median (95% confidence intervals) of Delta Amplitude (N75-P100) amplitudes at 10% and 85% contrast were 4.6 uV (4.1–5.9) and 7.1 uV (5.15–9.31). The median P100 latencies were 115.2 ms (112.0–117.7) and 104.0 ms (99.9–106.0). There was little within-session variability for any of these parameters. Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged between 0.64 and 0.98, and within subject coefficients of variation were 3–5% (P100 latency) and 15–30% (Delta Amplitude (N75-P100) amplitude). Bland–Altman plots showed good agreement between the first and fifth test sessions (85% contrast Delta Amplitude (N75-P100) delta amplitude, mean difference, 0.48 mV, 95% CI, −0.18–1.12; 85% contrast P100 latency delay, −0.82 ms, 95% CI, −3.12–1.46; 10% contrast Delta Amplitude (N75-P100) amplitude, 0.58 mV, 95% CI, −0.27–1.45; 10% contrast P100 latency delay, −2.05 mV, 95% CI, −5.12–1.01). The inter-eye correlation and agreement were significant for both SD-tVEP amplitude and P100 latency measurements. For the subset of eyes in which the inter-session repeatability was tested, the intraclass correlation coefficients ranged between 0.71 and 0.86 with good agreement shown on Bland–Altman plots. Short-duration transient VEP technology showed good within-session, inter-session repeatability, and good inter-eye correlation and agreement.
format Text
id pubmed-2869044
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28690442010-05-24 Repeatability of short-duration transient visual evoked potentials in normal subjects Tello, Celso De Moraes, Carlos Gustavo V. Prata, Tiago S. Derr, Peter Patel, Jayson Siegfried, John Liebmann, Jeffrey M. Ritch, Robert Doc Ophthalmol Original Research Article To evaluate the within-session and inter-session repeatability of a new, short-duration transient visual evoked potential (SD-tVEP) device on normal individuals, we tested 30 normal subjects (20/20 visual acuity, normal 24-2 SITA Standard VF) with SD-tVEP. Ten of these subjects had their tests repeated within 1–2 months from the initial visit. Synchronized single-channel EEG was recorded using a modified Diopsys Enfant™ System (Diopsys, Inc., Pine Brook, New Jersey, USA). A checkerboard stimulus was modulated at two reversals per second. Two different contrasts of checkerboard reversal patterns were used: 85% Michelson contrast with a mean luminance of 66.25 cd/m(2) and 10% Michelson contrast with a mean luminance of 112 cd/m(2). Each test lasted 20 s. Both eyes, independently and together, were tested 10 times (5 times at each contrast level). The following information was identified from the filtered N75-P100-N135 complex: N75 amplitude, N75 latency, P100 amplitude, P100 latency, and Delta Amplitude (N75-P100). The median values for each eye’s five SD-tVEP parameters were calculated and grouped into two data sets based on contrast level. Mean age was 27.3 ± 5.2 years. For OD only, the median (95% confidence intervals) of Delta Amplitude (N75-P100) amplitudes at 10% and 85% contrast were 4.6 uV (4.1–5.9) and 7.1 uV (5.15–9.31). The median P100 latencies were 115.2 ms (112.0–117.7) and 104.0 ms (99.9–106.0). There was little within-session variability for any of these parameters. Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged between 0.64 and 0.98, and within subject coefficients of variation were 3–5% (P100 latency) and 15–30% (Delta Amplitude (N75-P100) amplitude). Bland–Altman plots showed good agreement between the first and fifth test sessions (85% contrast Delta Amplitude (N75-P100) delta amplitude, mean difference, 0.48 mV, 95% CI, −0.18–1.12; 85% contrast P100 latency delay, −0.82 ms, 95% CI, −3.12–1.46; 10% contrast Delta Amplitude (N75-P100) amplitude, 0.58 mV, 95% CI, −0.27–1.45; 10% contrast P100 latency delay, −2.05 mV, 95% CI, −5.12–1.01). The inter-eye correlation and agreement were significant for both SD-tVEP amplitude and P100 latency measurements. For the subset of eyes in which the inter-session repeatability was tested, the intraclass correlation coefficients ranged between 0.71 and 0.86 with good agreement shown on Bland–Altman plots. Short-duration transient VEP technology showed good within-session, inter-session repeatability, and good inter-eye correlation and agreement. Springer-Verlag 2010-01-29 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2869044/ /pubmed/20111979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10633-010-9216-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Tello, Celso
De Moraes, Carlos Gustavo V.
Prata, Tiago S.
Derr, Peter
Patel, Jayson
Siegfried, John
Liebmann, Jeffrey M.
Ritch, Robert
Repeatability of short-duration transient visual evoked potentials in normal subjects
title Repeatability of short-duration transient visual evoked potentials in normal subjects
title_full Repeatability of short-duration transient visual evoked potentials in normal subjects
title_fullStr Repeatability of short-duration transient visual evoked potentials in normal subjects
title_full_unstemmed Repeatability of short-duration transient visual evoked potentials in normal subjects
title_short Repeatability of short-duration transient visual evoked potentials in normal subjects
title_sort repeatability of short-duration transient visual evoked potentials in normal subjects
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2869044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20111979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10633-010-9216-3
work_keys_str_mv AT tellocelso repeatabilityofshortdurationtransientvisualevokedpotentialsinnormalsubjects
AT demoraescarlosgustavov repeatabilityofshortdurationtransientvisualevokedpotentialsinnormalsubjects
AT pratatiagos repeatabilityofshortdurationtransientvisualevokedpotentialsinnormalsubjects
AT derrpeter repeatabilityofshortdurationtransientvisualevokedpotentialsinnormalsubjects
AT pateljayson repeatabilityofshortdurationtransientvisualevokedpotentialsinnormalsubjects
AT siegfriedjohn repeatabilityofshortdurationtransientvisualevokedpotentialsinnormalsubjects
AT liebmannjeffreym repeatabilityofshortdurationtransientvisualevokedpotentialsinnormalsubjects
AT ritchrobert repeatabilityofshortdurationtransientvisualevokedpotentialsinnormalsubjects