Cargando…

Cues of intraguild predators affect the distribution of intraguild prey

Theory on intraguild (IG) predation predicts that coexistence of IG-predators and IG-prey is only possible for a limited set of parameter values, suggesting that IG-predation would not be common in nature. This is in conflict with the observation that IG-predation occurs in many natural systems. One...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choh, Yasuyuki, van der Hammen, Tessa, Sabelis, Maurice W., Janssen, Arne
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2871106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20354730
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1605-5
_version_ 1782181145857753088
author Choh, Yasuyuki
van der Hammen, Tessa
Sabelis, Maurice W.
Janssen, Arne
author_facet Choh, Yasuyuki
van der Hammen, Tessa
Sabelis, Maurice W.
Janssen, Arne
author_sort Choh, Yasuyuki
collection PubMed
description Theory on intraguild (IG) predation predicts that coexistence of IG-predators and IG-prey is only possible for a limited set of parameter values, suggesting that IG-predation would not be common in nature. This is in conflict with the observation that IG-predation occurs in many natural systems. One possible explanation for this difference might be antipredator behaviour of the IG-prey, resulting in decreased strength of IG-predation. We studied the distribution of an IG-prey, the predatory mite Neoseiulus cucumeris (Acari: Phytoseiidae), in response to cues of its IG-predator, the predatory mite Iphiseius degenerans. Shortly after release, the majority of IG-prey was found on the patch without cues of IG-predators, suggesting that they can rapidly assess predation risk. IG-prey also avoided patches where conspecific juveniles had been killed by IG-predators. Because it is well known that antipredator behaviour in prey is affected by the diet of the predator, we also tested whether IG-prey change their distribution in response to the food of the IG-predators (pollen or conspecific juveniles), but found no evidence for this. The IG-prey laid fewer eggs on patches with cues of IG-predators than on patches without cues. Hence, IG-prey changed their distribution and oviposition in response to cues of IG-predators. This might weaken the strength of IG-predation, possibly providing more opportunities for IG-prey and IG-predators to co-exist.
format Text
id pubmed-2871106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28711062010-05-26 Cues of intraguild predators affect the distribution of intraguild prey Choh, Yasuyuki van der Hammen, Tessa Sabelis, Maurice W. Janssen, Arne Oecologia Behavioral ecology - Original Paper Theory on intraguild (IG) predation predicts that coexistence of IG-predators and IG-prey is only possible for a limited set of parameter values, suggesting that IG-predation would not be common in nature. This is in conflict with the observation that IG-predation occurs in many natural systems. One possible explanation for this difference might be antipredator behaviour of the IG-prey, resulting in decreased strength of IG-predation. We studied the distribution of an IG-prey, the predatory mite Neoseiulus cucumeris (Acari: Phytoseiidae), in response to cues of its IG-predator, the predatory mite Iphiseius degenerans. Shortly after release, the majority of IG-prey was found on the patch without cues of IG-predators, suggesting that they can rapidly assess predation risk. IG-prey also avoided patches where conspecific juveniles had been killed by IG-predators. Because it is well known that antipredator behaviour in prey is affected by the diet of the predator, we also tested whether IG-prey change their distribution in response to the food of the IG-predators (pollen or conspecific juveniles), but found no evidence for this. The IG-prey laid fewer eggs on patches with cues of IG-predators than on patches without cues. Hence, IG-prey changed their distribution and oviposition in response to cues of IG-predators. This might weaken the strength of IG-predation, possibly providing more opportunities for IG-prey and IG-predators to co-exist. Springer-Verlag 2010-03-31 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2871106/ /pubmed/20354730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1605-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Behavioral ecology - Original Paper
Choh, Yasuyuki
van der Hammen, Tessa
Sabelis, Maurice W.
Janssen, Arne
Cues of intraguild predators affect the distribution of intraguild prey
title Cues of intraguild predators affect the distribution of intraguild prey
title_full Cues of intraguild predators affect the distribution of intraguild prey
title_fullStr Cues of intraguild predators affect the distribution of intraguild prey
title_full_unstemmed Cues of intraguild predators affect the distribution of intraguild prey
title_short Cues of intraguild predators affect the distribution of intraguild prey
title_sort cues of intraguild predators affect the distribution of intraguild prey
topic Behavioral ecology - Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2871106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20354730
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1605-5
work_keys_str_mv AT chohyasuyuki cuesofintraguildpredatorsaffectthedistributionofintraguildprey
AT vanderhammentessa cuesofintraguildpredatorsaffectthedistributionofintraguildprey
AT sabelismauricew cuesofintraguildpredatorsaffectthedistributionofintraguildprey
AT janssenarne cuesofintraguildpredatorsaffectthedistributionofintraguildprey