Cargando…
Cues of intraguild predators affect the distribution of intraguild prey
Theory on intraguild (IG) predation predicts that coexistence of IG-predators and IG-prey is only possible for a limited set of parameter values, suggesting that IG-predation would not be common in nature. This is in conflict with the observation that IG-predation occurs in many natural systems. One...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2871106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20354730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1605-5 |
_version_ | 1782181145857753088 |
---|---|
author | Choh, Yasuyuki van der Hammen, Tessa Sabelis, Maurice W. Janssen, Arne |
author_facet | Choh, Yasuyuki van der Hammen, Tessa Sabelis, Maurice W. Janssen, Arne |
author_sort | Choh, Yasuyuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | Theory on intraguild (IG) predation predicts that coexistence of IG-predators and IG-prey is only possible for a limited set of parameter values, suggesting that IG-predation would not be common in nature. This is in conflict with the observation that IG-predation occurs in many natural systems. One possible explanation for this difference might be antipredator behaviour of the IG-prey, resulting in decreased strength of IG-predation. We studied the distribution of an IG-prey, the predatory mite Neoseiulus cucumeris (Acari: Phytoseiidae), in response to cues of its IG-predator, the predatory mite Iphiseius degenerans. Shortly after release, the majority of IG-prey was found on the patch without cues of IG-predators, suggesting that they can rapidly assess predation risk. IG-prey also avoided patches where conspecific juveniles had been killed by IG-predators. Because it is well known that antipredator behaviour in prey is affected by the diet of the predator, we also tested whether IG-prey change their distribution in response to the food of the IG-predators (pollen or conspecific juveniles), but found no evidence for this. The IG-prey laid fewer eggs on patches with cues of IG-predators than on patches without cues. Hence, IG-prey changed their distribution and oviposition in response to cues of IG-predators. This might weaken the strength of IG-predation, possibly providing more opportunities for IG-prey and IG-predators to co-exist. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2871106 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28711062010-05-26 Cues of intraguild predators affect the distribution of intraguild prey Choh, Yasuyuki van der Hammen, Tessa Sabelis, Maurice W. Janssen, Arne Oecologia Behavioral ecology - Original Paper Theory on intraguild (IG) predation predicts that coexistence of IG-predators and IG-prey is only possible for a limited set of parameter values, suggesting that IG-predation would not be common in nature. This is in conflict with the observation that IG-predation occurs in many natural systems. One possible explanation for this difference might be antipredator behaviour of the IG-prey, resulting in decreased strength of IG-predation. We studied the distribution of an IG-prey, the predatory mite Neoseiulus cucumeris (Acari: Phytoseiidae), in response to cues of its IG-predator, the predatory mite Iphiseius degenerans. Shortly after release, the majority of IG-prey was found on the patch without cues of IG-predators, suggesting that they can rapidly assess predation risk. IG-prey also avoided patches where conspecific juveniles had been killed by IG-predators. Because it is well known that antipredator behaviour in prey is affected by the diet of the predator, we also tested whether IG-prey change their distribution in response to the food of the IG-predators (pollen or conspecific juveniles), but found no evidence for this. The IG-prey laid fewer eggs on patches with cues of IG-predators than on patches without cues. Hence, IG-prey changed their distribution and oviposition in response to cues of IG-predators. This might weaken the strength of IG-predation, possibly providing more opportunities for IG-prey and IG-predators to co-exist. Springer-Verlag 2010-03-31 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2871106/ /pubmed/20354730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1605-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Behavioral ecology - Original Paper Choh, Yasuyuki van der Hammen, Tessa Sabelis, Maurice W. Janssen, Arne Cues of intraguild predators affect the distribution of intraguild prey |
title | Cues of intraguild predators affect the distribution of intraguild prey |
title_full | Cues of intraguild predators affect the distribution of intraguild prey |
title_fullStr | Cues of intraguild predators affect the distribution of intraguild prey |
title_full_unstemmed | Cues of intraguild predators affect the distribution of intraguild prey |
title_short | Cues of intraguild predators affect the distribution of intraguild prey |
title_sort | cues of intraguild predators affect the distribution of intraguild prey |
topic | Behavioral ecology - Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2871106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20354730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1605-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chohyasuyuki cuesofintraguildpredatorsaffectthedistributionofintraguildprey AT vanderhammentessa cuesofintraguildpredatorsaffectthedistributionofintraguildprey AT sabelismauricew cuesofintraguildpredatorsaffectthedistributionofintraguildprey AT janssenarne cuesofintraguildpredatorsaffectthedistributionofintraguildprey |